14 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-05 0615 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-05 0615 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTpmErtkKwc&lc=z13dg5jyrwaoipveu223vbi5su2gsjev4
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/29K3BsS4J8B
https://pastebin.com/MBhJqMPF
__

+Brian Hill __ It is not about whether the story is true or false *and there may not ever be a way to present a story like this with "sufficient proof"* - for only the cat itself can know with certainty if it indeed had been trapped for as long as we've been told! _It isn't about that_.







Rather - think of it like doing a Sudoku puzzle. *Each time you do a Sudoku you get a little better at doing Sudoku puzzles*. Each news item which lacks sufficient proof is like being given a Sudoku puzzle. *The audience - _unwittingly_ - is getting better and better at solving _a special kind of Sudoku puzzle_*.







In this case - the audience is getting better at *using its imagination to "fill in the blanks"*. Each time this is done the audience gets a little better and a little more comfortable doing so. It gets easier. By the time a person is an adult he or she is an *expert* at filling in the blanks.







And each time *you* do this - you have *convinced yourself* of the story (whether "true or false") because *you* invented the story and *you* filled in (supplied) the *missing pieces*. It is *you* who constructs a "narrative" that conforms to your belief bias. The news media and the "charming scumbags" simply give you "possibilities" to latch onto to help you create your own narrative. It's like writing your own "choose your own adventure" for each lie system event and claim.







Any objections that are raised - *you simply invent "plausible explanations" for them* that conform to your pre-existing belief bias and you get better at "suppressing the doubt" ("doubt suppression training").







It is very difficult - _and for many outright impossible_ - *to argue against yourself*! And that's a *consequence* of routinely and systematically presenting events and claims without sufficient proof.







The audience simply *convinces itself* - and the lie system (our "farmers") remain "invisible" *throughout this process*. There's no one demanding you believe X or Y because you are free to embrace or reject whatever the "charming scumbags" present. All that matters - as far as the lie system is concerned - is that *you form a belief* from what *should not* lead to belief! (Each belief formed is an "unjustified belief" that the audience mistakes as being a "justified belief" - but really we should be forming *no belief whatsoever* from what we're presented with *when it lacks sufficient proof*.)







This formation of belief happens because it's *all you* who is doing the convincing. You are "picking and choosing" whatever you want to reinforce your personal belief-bias. *You are being trained to accept lies that are presented to you as truth _by being exposed to truth that is being presented in the same form a lie would need to take_. This is simple stuff.







Each person who is unaware of this process going on is being further trained to believe *whatever they want to believe* - within the bounds of what that person can accept is "possible" and imagine "true". Each person - whether they call events hoaxes or not - does so in a way that conforms to their concept of "reality" (each belief is "reality based"). For example - "Deep Inside the Bullsh!t Hole" ("DITRH") would have you believe the Earth is definitely flat and that there could once have been giant 60-mile high trees but he won't tell you that there are reptilians running the show. That's just crazy talk. That isn't "based in reality" - so flat Earth and giant trees are fine - _but reptilian overloads is just silly_.







As usual I am getting carried away so I'll wrap this up.







Until *you* become aware of the simple *perceptual magic trick* being performed in front of the audience every day (in ten thousand different ways) *you* will end up stuck in a *planned dichotomy* of "event scepticism"/"event skeptics" (where "events *are not* as reported" - i.e., "hoaxtards") and "event realism"/"event realists" (where "events *are* as reported" - i.e., "realtards").







No meaningful progress can be made on either side and each side becomes more deeply entrenched though with some occasionally (or eventually) converting to the other - _such as with "reformed hoaxtards" who go on to become devoted "event realists". (I.e., nothing makes for a stronger Atheist than a Christian who has lost faith and nothing makes for a stronger Christian than an Atheist who has found God.)







You need to *rise above* the *planned dichotomy* and focus on *how* the lie system voodoo works (otherwise you will remain more vulnerable to it). Then you can become a genuine skeptic who _can appreciate *the great big magic show* taking place below_.





__





This comment paste has been filed under Lesta's Lie System Posts. A link to the original thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTpmErtkKwc&lc=z13dg5jyrwaoipveu223vbi5su2gsjev4

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.