Liberalism

Always demand a liberal solution and critique it

My position is that liberalism presupposes a certain level of societal discourse and cohesion, as such when that breaks down, liberal solutions go out the window. And that personal freedom as the highest good has been bad, your definition aside. And Progs owned the shit out of it, "free society" aside. Have to own that

1. In the US we have liberalism on paper, not practice, most individualistic nation

2. seems like every failure of liberalism is because some variable wasnt aligned properly, seems high maintenance. Like a gun which jams a lot.

3. a lot of this is liberals saying self-described liberals who argue for emancipatory policies arent liberal. Like AnComs saying the USSR didnt match theory

4. Israel took lotsa immigrants from lotsa places, common identity worked

5. Liberalism is hard, something easy and frankly non-rational acts as a good impetus because it comes so easily (seems reasonable). Like a gun which doesnt jam.

6. Seems most effective at attacking right wing defenses of civilization

7. I think liberal society absorbs its problems and decides they are either acceptable concessions or were ackshully true liberalism all along, because freedom can ultimately come down to feeling

8. Liberalism does assume a certain level of society, and when things degrade it becomes untenable and pernicious, aggressive, sneaky ideas fill the void.

9. w/ Branon v Sargon, we already see liberalism meaning a bunch of things but all just ified the same way

10. We do just need a solution, even if it isnt great. We need one because failure is irreocverable since we cant replicate this experiment

11. Race being immutable is unfair, but it is also a mark of its potency as a social variable, as Jaredy Taylor said "it cannot be concealed"

12. like alinsky, you ignore these things are your own peril/impoverishment. Yea, they arent nice but they simply are

13. I take a hegelian view, that society progresses by alternating extremes. And we do live in a time of high polarization. And, tbh, civic nationalism just hasnt worked except when there was an ethnic supermajority anyway. While I can come up with conceptual reasons for that, I dont HAVE to, it's just extra credit. The burden isnt really on me.

14. We have no way of making non-whites liberal, we have shown we can make whites act as an implicit interest group. We have progress there, on the gun which doesnt jam all the time.
------------------

1. deconstructive force.

2. 1960s movements, libertines

3. Jean Raspail, overly concerned with broad humanity and being nice/open

4. What is the liberal solution to being cucked?

5. Why are the most liberal nations, anglo ones having the hardest time dealing with immigration

6. How to liberalize nonwhites, identity politics have gotten a lot for them, while whites get fucked over because we arent an interest group

7. Trump as nascent white identity politics, therefore idpol is a workable solution, and we kinda just need a solution

8. their solution is always "liberal harder", clearly theory isnt meeting reality if it keeps getting pushed aside

9. Yuri Bezmenov on the openness of the West

10. Justin Trudeau denounced idpol, ie nationalism, because it's a threat

11. This is how liberal democracy is playing out: mass immigration, censorship, freedoms being given away

12. separation

13. it's only whites as a practical matter

14. liberal solution to the issue of demographics

15 when was real liberalism a thing?