Controlled Opposition is Everywhere

https://youtu.be/Dh2YYXLlWng

"The best way to control the opposition
is to lead it." - Vladimer Lenin

Whelp. I knew Alex Jones was CIA/Mossad of some kind, but it seems he's also a mason. What saddens me the most about this video is that it suggests David Icke and Zacharia Sitchin are also controlled opposition masons. All of Project Camelot may be as well.

I already knew the Rockefeller Initiative co-opted the UFO/UAP/EBE community decades ago. But it doesn't make it any less worrisome to know about it. Who do you trust? Who can you trust?

Of course this doesn't mean everything they say is wrong. Quite the contrary... most of the things they say are right, which is what makes it all the more upsetting when they mislead or derail us. For example, Alex Jones backed off of the Sandy Hook hoax entirely. I can understand why, given Wolfgang Halbig never backed off, and they played legal games with him for years that eventually bankrupted him.

They couldn't beat Wolfgang or prove his assertions and research wrong, so they colluded to ruin his life instead.

And the opposition's biggest names being controlled doesn't make the opposition wrong. We still have ZERO reason to trust the press, or NASA, or the CIA, or the Royal Society, or the Ivy League, or anyone or anything.

I have yet to see compelling footage of Earth from more than a few thousand miles away. There is still reason to suspect that they are hiding geographical features, from missing continents, to a giant gaping hole at the North Pole, to the shape and scope of the Antarctic being completely fabricated, to perhaps even the size and nature of the Earth itself.

On one hand, I'm sure amateur astronomers can prove that the objects in the sky are indeed real objects and are very, very far away.

But beyond that? I have absolutely no idea, at least not at any level of confidence. I'm not saying I believe flat Earth. :p Just because official explanations are bunk, doesn't mean we can assume the first alternative explanation.

And yet... NASA performs their launch calculations based on a flat, non-rotating model of Earth...

I say all this while wearing a NASA t-shirt. Oh the irony.

Anyway. I have nothing particularly important to say here. Just lamenting the lack of trustable sources from ANY faction. I can't even trust that the Bible hasn't been tampered with, or that it wasn't a psy-op of its own. If the Bible was legit, then why the need to silence and genocide the Christian Gnostics?

At least there are ancient cosmologies that conclude the Earth is a planet with a star, among other planets with stars. And yet... I'm still not certain of anything. Should I change my mind because someone who also doesn't know, might insist I'm an idiot for not being as certain as they? Not now, not ever.

Sigh. Maybe Socrates was right. All I can know, is that I don't know anything. How painful.

SHOW US THE EARTH YOU SPOOKS. THE REAL EARTH. NOT YOUR TAPESTRY OF LIES SOWN TOGETHER FROM SATELLITE COMPOSITES. Not your low earth orbit parlor tricks either!

All we can do is poke holes in their lies, which would be everything we're told about everything. We can only prove what is not; not what is. Such is the nature of science, I suppose, but when do we get the 40,000 mile view from the sky? Figuratively and literally?

Like, are we a series of domes connected by an infinite plane of ice? XD I'm only half kidding, that's the sad part...

Do you trust that any images of Earth (in its entirety) are not photoshopped or CGI? You shouldn't. They are all artistic renders and composites. NASA says so themselves; "b-because, they have to be!"

Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigghhhh