Read Section 2
https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/4169/text

Why on Earth would I be ok with some corporation which operates for profit, has been granted legal immunity against lawsuits, won't disclose the ingredients, has knowingly used unsafe ingredients in the past, and has also admitted that there has been no research into any long term effect, to inject me with something that can only protect against a weakened strain of a pathogen?

Vaccines don't prevent outbreaks, and they don't test for any long term effects of injecting 200 times the ppb of what's considered hazmat.





Media funded by pharmaceutical companies, you mean
http://archive.is/6cHWP
http://archive.is/QOSP7
http://archive.is/LiQIi






http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23609067
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198681
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173748/


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
>Hypothesis
lol, okay.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23609067
Not about autism.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
Spurious correlation at best.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
>Commentary
Lol

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
>Review
Not an actual study. I'm sure you've included the others associated with it.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
>As with all cross-sectional secondary data
analyses, causality cannot be determined, and
this study is subject to bias from unmeasured
or uncontrolled confounding factors

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
>Clearly, we cannot draw definite conclusions regarding the link between Al adjuvants and autism based on an ecological study such as
the present one and hence the validity of our results remains to be confirmed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
This is the dude that has been chemically castrating kids and had his medical license revoked.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
>Review
And the same guy as before.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
>Review

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498
>Hypothesis

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
>2001
Stay in the current decade with your evidence, please.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
You really love the fuck out of Geier, don't you?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
>Hypothesis

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490
Guess who?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
Not current decade, and spurious correlation with no suggested mechanism.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260
Not current decade, and at best illustrates possible mechanism but fails to draw causation.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
Review. Not current decade.