Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jun 7th, 2017
560
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.84 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [10:47:03] <RichardD> how do I let datatog tell me lines from the IPG? :(
  2. [10:48:08] <RichardD> cause someone is asking me about exception nr 3. to IPG 3.6
  3. [10:48:46] <RichardD> when a GVR has made it so that one player has more cards then they're supposed to
  4. [10:48:51] <RichardD> *than
  5. [10:49:38] <LokiiWork> brainstorm
  6. [10:50:13] <RichardD> we return those to the top of their library
  7. [10:50:27] <RichardD> how is that more cards? only if he/she forgets to put them back, right/
  8. [10:50:29] <RichardD> ?
  9. [10:50:50] <RichardD> i mean, resolving brainstorm = -1 + 3 - 2 = 0
  10. [10:51:12] <RichardD> so it is just as many cards, but other ones
  11. [10:52:12] <RichardD> so now the guy is asking
  12. [10:52:24] <RichardD> what if my opponent plays Breakthrough for X=2
  13. [10:52:31] <RichardD> and he doesn't discard
  14. [10:52:45] <RichardD> do the cards get put back on top of the library?
  15. [10:53:03] <RichardD> cause now the player has more cards than he's supposed to
  16. [10:53:39] <RichardD> but they should've been discarded
  17. [10:53:45] <ofdChurch> it is the second additional remedy for GRV
  18. [10:53:55] <ofdChurch> Viladecans
  19. [10:53:56] <RichardD> see
  20. [10:53:56] <ofdChurch> crap
  21. [10:53:58] <ofdChurch> sorry
  22. [10:54:07] <ofdChurch> If a player forgot to discard or return cards from their hand to another zone, that player does so.
  23. [10:54:09] <RichardD> that's why I needed the Datatog!
  24. [10:54:16] <RichardD> aha
  25. [10:54:32] <ofdChurch> !IPG 3.6
  26. [10:54:36] <Datatog> 819 cards similar to "IPG 3.6" found and sent to ofdChurch.
  27. [10:54:41] <ofdChurch> nope :(
  28. [10:54:53] <RichardD> but brainstorm is not an example for nr3, unless he/she doesn't put back the cards, right?
  29. [10:55:05] <sokjes> command used to be !pg but it is now disabled
  30. [10:55:11] <Tasha> It's actually 2
  31. [10:55:14] <sokjes> I think yawg stopped updating (unsure about that)
  32. [10:55:23] <Tasha> Because they forgot to return cards from their hand to another zone
  33. [10:55:27] <ofdChurch> yeah, it is covered under 2
  34. [10:56:13] <sokjes> exception 3 is for counsel of the sorotami without blue
  35. [10:56:14] <Tasha> 3 would apply if, say, a player cast a tutor that put the card into their hand when they weren't allowed to, or... I don't know, Grim Discovery with no black sources
  36. [10:56:26] <Tasha> At least that's my understanding
  37. [10:56:48] <RichardD> but...that's silly :(
  38. [10:56:58] <RichardD> first you determine it is too difficult to fix
  39. [10:57:12] <RichardD> then you fix and make the player lose his/her spell
  40. [10:57:13] * Lim_Dul (~Limdul@xdsl-89-0-158-191.netcologne.de) Quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
  41. [10:57:18] <RichardD> right?
  42. [10:57:23] * Carsten is now known as Cars10afk
  43. [10:57:32] * Cari (~kuranes@pool-96-241-158-231.washdc.fios.verizon.net) Quit
  44. [10:57:37] <sokjes> very valid point
  45. [10:57:45] <sokjes> one I forgot to raise last time I realized it :p
  46. [10:57:50] * brimstone (~a@ool-457b6fa1.dyn.optonline.net) Quit (Ping timeout: 488 seconds)
  47. [10:58:09] <RichardD> and with the tutor example
  48. [10:58:14] <Tasha> Am not clear on that. It seems more in line with other DCI philosophy to either fix entirely or not at all in those cases
  49. [10:58:19] <RichardD> the player will probably still be happy
  50. [10:58:32] <RichardD> since his demonic tutor now became a vampiric tutor without the lifeloss
  51. [10:58:48] <RichardD> Tasha; so why the exception?
  52. [10:59:00] <Tasha> Well, you return cards at random. So they might still have the tutored card in hand
  53. [10:59:15] <Tasha> I should say it seems more in line *to me* on the above
  54. [10:59:25] * Faraday (~Faraday@ip-109-90-4-226.unitymediagroup.de) has joined #mtgjudge
  55. [11:00:06] <Tasha> I should also say that I am by no means a guru on philosophy. It was something that was brought up at the PTQ where I tested for L2, and it does seem very strange to me
  56. [11:01:37] <RichardD> i know most things about DCI philosophy
  57. [11:01:41] <RichardD> but this one eludes me
  58. [11:02:22] * brimstone (~a@ool-457b6fa1.dyn.optonline.net) has joined #mtgjudge
  59. [11:02:58] <Tasha> Can anyone make a case for why #3 should apply in those cases? Or alternately enlighten us on why it does not in fact apply?
  60. [11:04:26] <RichardD> i'm afraid this clause was forgotten to take out when drawing extra cards came back in
  61. [11:04:28] <Anusien> Where it should apply at all?
  62. [11:05:03] <Anusien> Is that what you mean?
  63. [11:05:29] <RichardD> yeah
  64. [11:05:41] <Tasha> Suppose player A casts Grim Discovery, returning cards from his graveyard to his hand, when he had no black sources available. Under the IPG as written, it seems like the solution (if it's deemed too complicated to back up) is to return cards at random from the hand to the top of the library
  65. [11:05:57] <Tasha> And that's weird. Likewise if a player casts a tutor when they could not do so.
  66. [11:06:00] <Anusien> Assuming we can't back up to the point of the error
  67. [11:06:13] * Poromagia (~testi@cs27019173.pp.htv.fi) has joined #mtgjudge
  68. [11:06:21] * Poromagia (~testi@cs27019173.pp.htv.fi) has left #mtgjudge
  69. [11:06:39] <BMcDole> Well, think about something like I activate Jace Beleren when there's a Pithing needle out, technically it's not DEC it's GRV they haven't forgotten to discard/return cards they just have an extra card in han
  70. [11:06:39] <Anusien> Let's say we activate one of the jaces with a Pithing Needle naming that card on the battlefield
  71. [11:06:42] <LokiiWork> Tasha, it applies to brainstorm and jace and effects such as that
  72. [11:06:44] <Anusien> ^5 BMcDole
  73. [11:06:49] <BMcDole> ^5
  74. [11:07:00] <BMcDole> That was odd
  75. [11:08:13] <Tasha> So exception 3 wouldn't apply in the cases I mentioned?
  76. [11:09:12] <BMcDole> It could, what do you mean tutor when they couldn't?
  77. [11:10:08] <Tasha> Let's say they cast Demonic Tutor with a Meddling Mage naming it, and neither player notices it in time to back up
  78. [11:10:17] * telliott (~telliott@corp-240.mv.mozilla.com) has joined #mtgjudge
  79. [11:10:19] * Gleemax sets mode: +v telliott
  80. [11:10:24] <RichardD> or tapping a dual with blood moon out
  81. [11:10:26] <LokiiWork> there's the man now
  82. [11:10:51] <BMcDole> Well, it doesn't seem like they have excess cards in hand there
  83. [11:10:54] * Rikipedia (~rikipedia@wsip-98-175-71-188.rn.hr.cox.net) has joined #mtgjudge
  84. [11:11:04] <RichardD> neither with brainstorm
  85. [11:11:09] <Tasha> How about Tooth and Nail, with Meddling Mage naming?
  86. [11:11:14] <RichardD> -1, +3, -2 = 0
  87. [11:11:17] <BMcDole> If you try to apply that fix there what's going to happen is you're going to put a card back at random and they won't get their tooth and nail back
  88. [11:11:41] <BMcDole> They've committed a GRV by casting it, but now that they have they don't have an extra card in hand
  89. [11:11:44] <RichardD> only with the brainstorm ability from jace it is +3 -2
  90. [11:12:07] <RichardD> so the only thing we can think of is activating Jace when not allowed...
  91. [11:12:11] * Lim_Dul (~Limdul@xdsl-89-0-80-151.netcologne.de) has joined #mtgjudge
  92. [11:12:19] <BMcDole> Sure, but again they've correctly resolved the ability, they just did it at a time when it wasn't permitted
  93. [11:12:24] <Tasha> But with Tooth and Nail, they're down 1 for playing, up 2 for the creature cards
  94. [11:12:29] <Tasha> so net +1
  95. [11:12:40] <LokiiWork> Tasha, you're reading way too much into that
  96. [11:13:24] <Tasha> I'm actually a lot more interested in the graveyard-recursion case than the tutor case
  97. [11:14:25] <Tasha> But what do you mean, Lokii?
  98. [11:15:14] * ofdChurch (~ofthechur@82.158.245.177.dyn.user.ono.com) Quit (Ping timeout: 492 seconds)
  99. [11:15:49] <Wiz_de> I have a feeling the wording may change in the next update
  100. [11:15:52] <telliott> indeed
  101. [11:15:59] <telliott> I wouldn't stress about it too much
  102. [11:16:07] <LokiiWork> and please rewind or don't rewind
  103. [11:16:14] <LokiiWork> dont' partially rewind a tutor effect heh
  104. [11:17:39] <Tasha> Sure. I'm not trying to stress it, and I definitely would unwind completely or not at all unless a HJ specifically told me otherwise. I was just curious about it.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement