LforLouise

Talion — 7:57 PM
Perfect. If there's no other questions onto the first question:

What IC and OOC aspects do you believe should be considered when deciding on the outcome of an Incident Report?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:03 PM
ICly, you should be considering the character's records, such as previous infractions, how reliable they are, and everything else the SCC/Hiring Corp would know and care about.

OOCly, considering the player's wishes, even if it's not always acted on (i.e. if the player doesnt want their character 'fired' after canonically killing someone, you're not exactly going to oblige their wish). Also, taking into account the player's behaviour, such as whether or not you think someone's being metagrudgey (which you'd escalate to admins)

Probably quite a few other things too but, as mentioned in my application, I'm not exactly the most experienced person here

Talion — 8:04 PM
Got it.
How do you feel about the Corporate Regulations we have currently? Do you think they're good, or do you think there's areas where they could be improved?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:07 PM
They aren't absolutely perfect but they're not bad either. They do what they're intended to do well enough. I can't suggest anything that could be added or removed, as I don't play security often enough to know what should be changed.
Talion — 8:07 PM

I see, I see
CCIA can sway the round heavily through announcements and faxes in response to ship faxes or antagonistic actions. Could you provide an example, either from your own personal experiences in a round or a hypothetical scenario, on when CCIA/Central Command should intervene with a heavy hand?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:12 PM
I've never had CCIA intervene in a round I've played command in, aside from the usual IR interviews, but I can imagine that in situations where command staff (or other roles held to a high standard, such as security officers) are blatantly acting against corporate interests, where it's not related to antagonist activity (unless the antagonists requests CCIA intervention to further improve the round), CCIA would probably be very interested in intervening there.

Talion — 8:13 PM
Makes sense
During one of your incident report investigations, you learn that the incident that occurred was the fault of both parties, one instigating another, and the other responding with escalation. While both conflicting parties have managed to resolve this amongst themselves, the reporter still believes they should be punished for causing the incident in the first place as it has distracted multiple departments from their work. What would you look into before handing down the resolution,  do you think the parties involved should be punished?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:15 PM
Uh quick question for clarification if you don't mind,
the reporter still believes they should be punished
Is 'the reporter' referring to the player or the character?

Talion — 8:17 PM
Both in this case

LouiseIsntHome — 8:19 PM
👍
From an OOC perspective, I'd look into whether or not the player has a reason for wanting the other character to be punished, whether or not it's malicious.
ICly, as the fault lies with both parties, but they've resolved it without need for intervention, no further action would be necessary - it would only waste time, and punish people who should no longer be punished.

Talion — 8:21 PM
Got it.

Next question:   During one round, the antagonists decided to play a fake Hephaestus representative gimmick. They have escalated things, were spotted trying to break into the chief engineer's office with weapons visible, and Command has decided to send a fax to confirm their identity and authorisation as a result. The round time is now 01:45, and you warn the antagonists via AOOC that you will now reply. The antagonists ask you not to blow the cover of their gimmick. What do you do?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:24 PM
I'd speak in AOOC with the antagonists about why I would reply to the fax, to let them know my thoughts and see if they change their mind. If they agree, I'd reply to the fax, if they don't, I wouldn't reply.

Talion — 8:25 PM
Cool.

Final question:  Command has sent you a fax informing you that the Dominian consular has been arrested for instigating a duel on the holodeck and causing an injury, and are now requesting that you revoke their representative privileges as a result. The consular has actually done quite a lot more as an antagonist, including killing someone, but this was just before the fax was sent and left out of the paper. What do you reply with?

LouiseIsntHome — 8:28 PM
I'm pretty sure Directive 12 would allow command staff to arrest them for the instigation alone, which would also mean CCIA/CC can revoke the consular's privileges, despite the fact CCIA/CC wouldn't know about the murder(s). Obviously you'd use your own discretion, to see if revoking the privileges using the information provided is a necessary course of action.