API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

4 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-02 2250 +NikTT09

Lesta
Feb 2nd, 2016
83
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.70 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-02 2250 +NikTT09
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Tj6k5sDYc&lc=z12fhbfwowivsrxjx04cjntw5nz3j51bdeo
  3. https://pastebin.com/LkRCGWJp
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +NikTT09 __ Oh hey dummy, so according to you a "dropped frame" is responsible? That's obviously a *GUESS* but how are you sure it's the *correct* explanation? "Near enough" *is not* good enough. *If you cannot show the same glitch happening during known good footage then you are talking out of your a$$.*
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. I take it you're a fan of Reds Rhetoric? Are you excited about seeing alleged "ISS" footage that he personally vouches for? *_I know I am!_*
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. If it's simply "dropped frames" as you claim then show footage of the *same glitch* happening during *known good* footage or shut the f_kc up.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28. I can consistently show this *same type of glitch* (and a few other variations) throughout the corpus of purported "ISS" footage. And so if "NASA" with their billions are prone to this glitch *then finding a known good equivalent that replicates this problem should be easily done.*
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. Let me guess: you believe the alleged "ISS" is real and manned and the footage purportedly coming from it is genuine. Therefore it must have a natural and logical explanation - right? It just *has* to be "dropped frames" right?! Oh sure it does, dummy. _Sure it does._
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. But do "dropped frames" cause the range of *observed phenomena* that we see? Are you sure? *Without known good footage to compare it with you are just GUESSING.* You are hoping it has a "natural explanation" because you are in *denial.*
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49. Allow ME to guess for a moment: You know that there is a bright light that whizzes past in the sky according to a timetable found online *but YOU have never looked at it through a telescope.*
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55.  
  56. Like everyone else you just *assume* it must be the alleged "ISS" and that details can be discerned. Because no one has any interest in faking such a photo - right? At least one "Big Foot" photo must be genuine - right?
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. Show the same glitch happening in known good footage (i.e., replicated) or shut the f_kc up *and stop drooling into the reply box.*
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. __________________________________________
  68. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  69. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  70.  
  71. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  72. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  73.  
  74. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  75. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  76.  
  77. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  78. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!