theunpromisedone3

Trapwire Stratfor Email 7

Aug 9th, 2012
226
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
  1. Date 2010-09-23 16:50:28
  2. From Anya.Alfano@stratfor.com
  3. To burton@stratfor.com
  4. scott.stewart@stratfor.com
  5. Others InReplyTo: 073701cb5b2d$86322400$92966c00$@stewart@stratfor.com
  6. Text
  7. I'm not sure about the archives--have asked, will let you know.
  8.  
  9. It wouldn't hurt to rewrite some of those pieces. It would also be cool
  10. to see a "brief" type product that points out those issues when we see
  11. them--a little longer than a sitrep, with some analysis that could be
  12. digested quickly.
  13.  
  14. On 9/23/10 10:42 AM, scott stewart wrote:
  15. > Did turning off of the archives affect the special topics pages?
  16. >
  17. > Should we think about re-writing some of those pieces?
  18. >
  19. > -----Original Message-----
  20. > From: Fred Burton [mailto:burton@stratfor.com]
  21. > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:54 AM
  22. > To: Anya Alfano
  23. > Subject: Re: TrapWire (TW)
  24. >
  25. > The agencies with TW are potentially the single biggest captive audience
  26. > we have that could purchase something from us especially in the govt
  27. > arena. Do you know how much a Lockheed Martin would pay to have their
  28. > logo/feed into the USSS CP? MI5? RCMP? LAPD CT? NYPD CT? Its
  29. > unbelievable access. Either we handle this one right, or we'll fall
  30. > flat on our faces.
  31. >
  32. > Anya Alfano wrote:
  33. >> There are two types of information in there --
  34. >> 1. Sitrep Feeds
  35. >> 2. STRATFOR security series -- including the surveillance series and the
  36. >> attack cycle series.
  37. >>
  38. >> The Sitrep feeds are current and update every day, they're just not
  39. >> focused enough on security issues. The security series pieces are
  40. >> older, including the attack cycle one that's from 2006.
  41. >>
  42. >> I'm working with Kevin to make the sitreps more security focused, and
  43. >> I've got a list of more recent security pieces that they can put onto
  44. >> the site. That said, Dan was clear that he'd like to keep the attack
  45. >> cycle and surveillance series because they're very relevant, even if
  46. >> they're a few years old.
  47. >>
  48. >> On 9/23/10 8:24 AM, Fred Burton wrote:
  49. >>
  50. >>> What has been feeding in? How can stuff from 2006 be there?
  51. >>>
  52. >>> Anya Alfano wrote:
  53. >>>
  54. >>>> Fred,
  55. >>>> I talked with Dan and Alicia over there a few days ago--they gave me a
  56. >>>> visual presentation of the website and the sitrep feed. The sitreps
  57. >>>> aren't all focused on security at this point, but I've talked with Kevin
  58. >>>> in our IT department and we think we've found a solution. I'm planning
  59. >>>> to feed some security portal content in there with a new specialized
  60. >>>> query that we're creating for the latest version of the security portal,
  61. >>>> as long as Kevin says that's really possible.
  62. >>>>
  63. >>>> For the "Resources" content, I'm going to provide them with a few
  64. >>>> additional pieces to choose from that are more recent--then our editors
  65. >>>> group will reformat so they can host it on their site.
  66. >>>>
  67. >>>> We're planning to regroup on this either tomorrow or early next week,
  68. >>>> depending on their schedule. Let me know if you have any other
  69. > thoughts.
  70. >>>> Thanks,
  71. >>>> Anya
  72. >>>>
  73. >>>>
  74. >>>> On 9/22/10 7:52 PM, burton@stratfor.com wrote:
  75. >>>>
  76. >>>>
  77. >>>>> Thank goodness
  78. >>>>>
  79. >>>>> OMG
  80. >>>>>
  81. >>>>> I need to see what we are pushing in.
  82. >>>>>
  83. >>>>> ------Original Message------
  84. >>>>> From: Beth Bronder
  85. >>>>> To: Fred Burton
  86. >>>>> To: Korena Zucha
  87. >>>>> To: Anya Alfano
  88. >>>>> To: Scott Stewart
  89. >>>>> To: Rodger Baker
  90. >>>>> Cc: George Friedman
  91. >>>>> Cc: Darryl O'Connor
  92. >>>>> ReplyTo: Beth Bronder
  93. >>>>> Subject: Re: TrapWire (TW)
  94. >>>>> Sent: Sep 22, 2010 6:49 PM
  95. >>>>>
  96. >>>>> Fred -
  97. >>>>>
  98. >>>>> Anya is already working with someone from Mike's team to fix the
  99. > content feed (to be security focused) which is something that came up in a
  100. > meeting I had with Dan Burton from TW last week. We're on it.
  101. >>>>> Beth
  102. >>>>> ------Original Message------
  103. >>>>> From: Fred Burton
  104. >>>>> To: Beth Bronder
  105. >>>>> To: Korena Zucha
  106. >>>>> To: Anya Alfano
  107. >>>>> To: Scott Stewart
  108. >>>>> To: Rodger Baker
  109. >>>>> Cc: George Friedman
  110. >>>>> Cc: Darryl O'Connor
  111. >>>>> ReplyTo: Fred Burton
  112. >>>>> Subject: TrapWire (TW)
  113. >>>>> Sent: Sep 22, 2010 7:31 PM
  114. >>>>>
  115. >>>>> Chatted with Mike M, the TW operator and former CIA crony.
  116. >>>>>
  117. >>>>> He said our feed was taking up 25% of the TW screens inside the client
  118. > command posts and that the feedback they are getting is that the info being
  119. > pushed in is more geo-pol centered vice tactical-security.
  120. >>>>> How can we fix? Who is auditing what is going in the pipe?
  121. >>>>>
  122. >>>>> Thanks
  123. >>>>>
  124. >>>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  125. >>>>>
  126. >>>>>
  127. >>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  128. >>>>>
  129. >>>>>
  130. >>>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  131. >>>>>
  132. >>>>>
  133. >
RAW Paste Data