8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-23 1200 +cabadejo

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-23 1200 +cabadejo
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/CSg3kvnnKsV
https://pastebin.com/LVaLLxZj
__

+cabadejo __ Asking the right questions is always the best approach. Each person already has the answer within - it's simply a matter of teasing it out of them (or uncovering their "belief obstacle").



When I returned from my 2-month break I was very rusty! You just need to practice and it will all come back.



The important thing is to never assert anything as a fact about reality that we ourselves lack sufficient proof for. That would make up supreme hypocrites!



It may well be that "Stephen Hawking" is the longest lived "ALS" survivor. It may well be that through sheer force of will he has managed to grow back a healthy set of chompers so as to avoid that annoying feeding tube.



Of course - it all seems awfully unlikely but just because something is unlikely doesn't mean it is false (the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist").



So what approach can be used? What "normal people" might be able to accept is that "Stephen Hawking" has use of a "ghost writer".



That allows us to get a foot in the door.



"Normal people" are aware of what a "ghost writer" is and are already familiar with them. *If anyone in this mad world could benefit from a "ghost writer" then wouldn't it be "Stephen Hawking"?*



The only rebuttal I have come across to the idea of a "ghost writer" is that "Stephen Hawking is a genius and no one could ever write on his behalf".



And so when I have been mentioning the "ghost writer" I have also been pointing out: _"Is there anything we hear or read from 'Hawking' that could not have also been written by a first year philosophy student with a marijuana habit?"_



I don't believe there is anything.



If you can get admission that it's possible there is a "ghost writer" then it naturally leads to the idea that "we're not told everything about him".



For example - why would "they" keep such a thing a secret from us? The answer is obvious: _because we are to take his words ON TRUST and as FACT without proof BECAUSE he is "a genius"!_



To "normal people" who have not looked into the issue "Stephen Hawking" is a literal "brain in a vat". And as a "genius" trapped in such a "state" it makes it possible for "normal people" to accept the claims about him as true.



And what a person can accept is possible and imagine true - that person becomes powerless to resist believing. Etc.



We need to loosen that "knot" which is binding people to the lie system's most fantastic *story*.

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.