Advertisement
Billabob

variant of hardest

Feb 24th, 2025 (edited)
19
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 28.25 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 9:a__ab_4aa__a_6a_5aa_a_aa_c_6aa_4bacaa_a4_aa_4a_3a__a_3a__a__a__a3__a__b_a__a_,a18s2s2s1a15a12m21d2s1s2d3s1s2a14d2s1a11a8s2a13m6a7m504m40a9d3m144m6s1m1344s3s1s1m162a6
  2.  
  3. Time taken: 68240048 ms
  4.  
  5. Max difficulty: 5.2; total difficulty: 799.5
  6.  
  7. 0: Filled in initial combinations & candidates
  8. 1: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 33 contain 3r9,6r9,9r9; eliminations in r9c1, r9c7, r9c8, r9c9
  9. 2: (3.2) Region sum: Row 9 must sum to 45; cages 29, 31's cells within this region must sum to 21; cages 29, 31 reduced from 120, 11 combinations to 108, 10
  10. 3: (4) Cage comparison: cages 20, 12 interact such that cage 12 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 12 combinations
  11. 4: (4) Cage comparison: cages 20, 28 interact such that cage 28 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 14 combinations
  12. 5: (4) Cage comparison: cages 27, 11 interact such that cage 11 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 14 combinations
  13. 6: (4) Cage comparison: cages 34, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 108 to 96 combinations
  14. 7: (4) Cage comparison: cages 25, 24 interact such that cage 24 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 6 combinations
  15. 8: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 12, 28 interact such that cage 28 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 12 combinations
  16. 9: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 17, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 45 to 43 combinations
  17. 10: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 19, 21, 18 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 12 combinations
  18. 11: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 21, 18 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  19. 12: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 18, 19, 21 interact such that cage 19 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 4 combinations
  20. 13: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 17, 19, 21, 18 interact such that cage 17 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 5 combinations
  21. 14: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 17, 31, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 43 to 42 combinations
  22. 15: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 19, 21, 18, 15 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 14 combinations
  23. 16: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 24, 23 interact such that cage 23 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  24. 17: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 14, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 96 to 92 combinations
  25. 18: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 48 to 47 combinations
  26. 19: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 14, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 47 to 46 combinations
  27. 20: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 24, 25, 23 interact such that cages 25, 23 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 6, 10 to 4, 8 combinations respectively
  28. 21: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 24, 25, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 80 to 77 combinations
  29. 22: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 24, 23, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 77 to 69 combinations
  30. 23: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 20, 24, 25, 23, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 69 to 62 combinations
  31. 24: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 17, 24, 25, 23, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 62 to 56 combinations
  32. 25: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 17, 31, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 42 to 40 combinations
  33. 26: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 10, 33, 18, 23, 1 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  34. 27: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 21, 25, 14, 30, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 92 to 88 combinations
  35. 28: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 8, 29 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 15 combinations
  36. 29: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 46 to 44 combinations
  37. 30: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 14, 30, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 88 to 80 combinations
  38. 31: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 25, 21, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 44 to 43 combinations
  39. 32: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 25, 24, 23, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 80 to 72 combinations
  40. 33: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 21, 14, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 43 to 42 combinations
  41. 34: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 14, 30, 8, 29 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 15 to 14 combinations
  42. 35: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 14, 30, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 42 to 38 combinations
  43. 36: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 14, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 38 to 37 combinations
  44. 37: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 19, 27, 34, 24, 11, 3 interact such that cage 3 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 15 combinations
  45. 38: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 17, 24, 23, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 56 to 49 combinations
  46. 39: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 20, 17, 21, 24, 23, 18 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 7 combinations
  47. 40: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 18, 19, 15 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  48. 41: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 18, 10, 33, 1, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 49 to 46 combinations
  49. 42: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 5, 31, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 40 to 38 combinations
  50. 43: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 25, 21, 14, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 37 to 36 combinations
  51. 44: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 25, 24, 23, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 36 to 35 combinations
  52. 45: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 17, 21, 24, 23, 29 interact such that cage 21 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 5 combinations
  53. 46: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 21, 14, 30, 8, 29 interact such that cages 21, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 5, 72 to 4, 54 combinations respectively
  54. 47: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 21, 14, 30, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 35 to 34 combinations
  55. 48: (5) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 34 to 33 combinations
  56. 49: (5) Cage comparison: cages 19, 27, 34, 6, 24, 11, 3 interact such that cage 3 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 15 to 14 combinations
  57. 50: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 17, 21, 24, 18, 23 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 7 to 6 combinations
  58. 51: (5) Cage comparison: cages 27, 34, 31, 30, 26, 32, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 54 to 52 combinations
  59. 52: (5) Cage comparison: cages 34, 31, 28, 30, 26, 32, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 52 to 50 combinations
  60. 53: (5) Cage comparison: cages 17, 5, 6, 31, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 38 to 37 combinations
  61. 54: (5) Cage comparison: cages 17, 5, 33, 31, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cages 0, 22 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 37, 46 to 33, 44 combinations respectively
  62. 55: (5) Cage comparison: cages 5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 8, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 33 to 32 combinations
  63. 56: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 21, 25, 24, 23, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 33 to 32 combinations
  64. 57: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 21, 25, 14, 30, 8, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 50 to 48 combinations
  65. 58: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 21, 25, 14, 30, 4, 29 interact such that cages 4, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 32, 48 to 31, 46 combinations respectively
  66. 59: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 20, 21, 25, 14, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 31 to 30 combinations
  67. 60: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cages 8, 4, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 14, 30, 46 to 12, 20, 37 combinations respectively
  68. 61: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 25, 34, 17, 14, 31, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 37 to 36 combinations
  69. 62: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 25, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cages 8, 4 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 12, 20 to 11, 19 combinations respectively
  70. 63: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 4, 20, 7, 12, 28, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 36 to 34 combinations
  71. 64: (5) Cage comparison: cages 8, 29, 13, 21, 25, 14, 30 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 11 to 10 combinations
  72. 65: (5) Cage comparison: cages 29, 27, 31, 28, 30, 26, 32 interact such that cage 26 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  73. 66: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 17, 18, 24, 23, 15, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 44 to 43 combinations
  74. 67: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 7, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 19 to 18 combinations
  75. 68: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 27, 34, 6, 24, 7, 11 interact such that cage 24 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 5 combinations
  76. 69: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 25, 17, 5, 31, 15, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 43 to 42 combinations
  77. 70: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 34, 17, 31, 28, 9, 22, 29 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 42 to 40 combinations
  78. 71: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 34, 31, 28, 30, 26, 32, 29 interact such that cages 26, 32, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 13, 16, 34 to 9, 14, 27 combinations respectively
  79. 72: (5) Cage comparison: cages 29, 13, 20, 21, 25, 8, 4 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  80. 73: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 17, 5, 31, 9, 0, 22, 29 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 40 to 39 combinations
  81. 74: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 5, 28, 30, 26, 32, 22, 29 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 39 to 38 combinations
  82. 75: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 23, 28, 30, 26, 32, 22, 29 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 38 to 36 combinations
  83. 76: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 31, 28, 30, 26, 32, 22, 29 interact such that cages 31, 30, 22, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 10, 12, 36, 27 to 9, 11, 26, 25 combinations respectively
  84. 77: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 31, 17, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 32 to 28 combinations
  85. 78: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 29, 22, 13, 25, 24, 23 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 25 to 23 combinations
  86. 79: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 29, 34, 17, 31, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 26 to 24 combinations
  87. 80: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 17, 5, 24, 23, 31, 9, 0, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 24 to 23 combinations
  88. 81: (5) Cage comparison: cages 22, 13, 25, 14, 26, 30, 29 interact such that cage 30 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 11 to 10 combinations
  89. 82: (5) Cage comparison: cages 30, 21, 25, 14, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 23 to 22 combinations
  90. 83: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 8, 0, 4 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 28 to 26 combinations
  91. 84: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cages 8, 4, 29 have incongruous combinations; reduced from 9, 18, 22 to 8, 17, 21 combinations respectively
  92. 85: (5) Cage comparison: cages 29, 25, 27, 34, 14, 31, 30 interact such that cage 30 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  93. 86: (5) Cage comparison: cages 30, 4, 29, 13, 21, 25, 14 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 17 to 16 combinations
  94. 87: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 21, 25, 14, 30, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 14 combinations
  95. 88: (5) Cage comparison: cages 4, 13, 20, 21, 12, 28, 29 interact such that cage 12 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  96. 89: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 13, 25, 34, 24, 23, 26, 22, 29 interact such that cage 34 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  97. 90: (5) Cage comparison: cages 34, 19, 27, 24, 7, 3, 11 interact such that cage 7 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 7 combinations
  98. 91: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 7, 13, 20, 8, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  99. 92: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 4, 21, 25, 14, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 21 to 18 combinations
  100. 93: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 4, 29, 34, 31, 3, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 26 to 25 combinations
  101. 94: (5) Cage comparison: cages 34, 29, 0, 17, 31, 9, 22 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 25 to 23 combinations
  102. 95: (5) Cage comparison: cages 34, 29, 24, 23, 26, 31, 22 interact such that cage 31 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  103. 96: (5) Cage comparison: cages 34, 31, 4, 29, 0, 21, 17 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 23 to 22 combinations
  104. 97: (5) Cage comparison: cages 7, 4, 29, 20, 27, 12, 28 interact such that cage 28 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  105. 98: (5) Cage comparison: cages 31, 28, 29, 27, 26, 32, 22 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 18 to 17 combinations
  106. 99: (5) Cage comparison: cages 4, 29, 13, 21, 25, 8, 30 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 7 combinations
  107. 100: (5.2) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 14, 12, 28, 30, 26, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 17 to 16 combinations
  108. 101: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 29, 20, 21, 14, 30, 4 interact such that cage 21 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  109. 102: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 21, 19, 18 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 4 combinations
  110. 103: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 21, 19, 15 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 11 combinations
  111. 104: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 18, 15, 19 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 11 to 9 combinations
  112. 105: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 21, 29, 13, 25, 17, 31 interact such that cage 17 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 5 to 4 combinations
  113. 106: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 17, 20, 24, 23 interact such that cage 20 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  114. 107: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 17, 24, 23, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 23 to 20 combinations
  115. 108: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 15, 29, 22, 27, 5, 32 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 20 to 19 combinations
  116. 109: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 17, 22, 31, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 22 to 20 combinations
  117. 110: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 29, 25, 14, 30, 4 interact such that cage 25 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  118. 111: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 25, 21, 13, 8, 30, 29 interact such that cage 30 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  119. 112: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 30, 21, 14, 4, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 12 combinations
  120. 113: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 25, 30, 4, 21, 14, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 15 combinations
  121. 114: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 21, 25, 30, 4, 29, 12 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 11 combinations
  122. 115: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 17, 15, 22, 24, 23 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  123. 116: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 15, 20, 21, 25, 5, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 19 to 18 combinations
  124. 117: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 22, 24, 23, 26 interact such that cage 26 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  125. 118: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 22, 5, 33, 15, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 20 to 19 combinations
  126. 119: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 22, 20, 25, 17, 24, 23 interact such that cage 20 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 3 to 2 combinations
  127. 120: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 14, 30, 4 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 11 to 10 combinations
  128. 121: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 20, 4, 21, 14, 30, 29 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  129. 122: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 4, 21, 25, 13, 14, 29 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 15 to 14 combinations
  130. 123: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 29 contain 8r9; eliminations in r9c1
  131. 124: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 29, 22, 25, 14, 30, 28 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  132. 125: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 29, 17, 31, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 18 to 17 combinations
  133. 126: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 26, 29, 22, 27, 23 interact such that cage 23 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 7 combinations
  134. 127: (5) Cage comparison: cages 20, 25, 4, 29, 13, 12, 28 interact such that cage 29 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 12 combinations
  135. 128: (1.5) Claiming candidates: cage 34 must contain 1 in r9c5, r9c6: from 3 combinations to 2
  136. 129: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 34 contain 5r9; eliminations in r9c1
  137. 130: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 31, 29, 27, 28, 22 interact such that cage 28 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  138. 131: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 29, 20, 25, 13, 8 interact such that cage 8 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 7 to 6 combinations
  139. 132: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 31, 29, 21, 17, 18, 19 interact such that cage 17 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  140. 133: (4) Cage comparison: cages 17, 9 interact such that cage 9 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 10 combinations
  141. 134: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 17, 9, 31 interact such that cage 9 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 8 combinations
  142. 135: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 17, 9, 31, 22, 0 interact such that cage 31 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 5 combinations
  143. 136: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 17, 21, 5, 15, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 17 to 15 combinations
  144. 137: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 31, 9, 29, 22, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 19 to 17 combinations
  145. 138: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 31, 9, 22, 0, 5 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 15 to 13 combinations
  146. 139: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 31, 29, 0, 21, 4 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 17 to 16 combinations
  147. 140: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 22, 21, 18, 19, 15 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 11 combinations
  148. 141: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 22, 31, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 16 to 14 combinations
  149. 142: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 0, 17, 31, 9 interact such that cage 31 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 5 to 4 combinations
  150. 143: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 20, 21, 18, 19, 15 interact such that cage 15 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 6 combinations
  151. 144: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 15, 5, 33, 22 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 11 to 7 combinations
  152. 145: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 22, 31, 9, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 12 combinations
  153. 146: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 0, 4, 3 interact such that cage 3 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  154. 147: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 22, 0, 17, 9 interact such that cage 9 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 6 combinations
  155. 148: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 15, 22, 5, 33, 32 interact such that cage 32 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 13 combinations
  156. 149: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 22, 17, 21, 18, 19 interact such that cage 18 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  157. 150: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 18, 10, 33, 1 interact such that cage 1 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 14 to 12 combinations
  158. 151: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 18, 22, 1, 10, 33 interact such that cage 1 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  159. 152: (4.8) Cage comparison: cages 17, 18, 15, 22, 24, 23 interact such that cage 22 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 7 to 6 combinations
  160. 153: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 22, 5, 15, 33, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  161. 154: (3.6) Region sum: Col 1 must sum to 45; cages 9, 31, 0, 22's cells within this region must sum to 37; cages 22 reduced from 6 combinations to 5
  162. 155: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 31, 9, 0 interact such that cage 31 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  163. 156: (1.5) Claiming candidates: cage 29 must contain 4 in r9c7, r9c8, r9c9: from 12 combinations to 11
  164. 157: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 0, 4, 3 interact such that cage 3 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 11 combinations
  165. 158: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 31, 0, 29, 4 interact such that cage 4 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  166. 159: (1.5) Claiming candidates: cage 29 must contain 1 in r7c8, r8c8, r9c8: from 11 combinations to 10
  167. 160: (1) Hidden single: 2 in r9c1
  168. 161: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 29 contain 6c8; eliminations in r3c8, r4c8
  169. 162: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 13 contain 5c8,9c8; eliminations in r2c8, r6c8
  170. 163: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 31, 17, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  171. 164: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 29, 22, 32 interact such that cage 32 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 13 to 12 combinations
  172. 165: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 31, 22, 29, 32 interact such that cage 32 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 12 to 10 combinations
  173. 166: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 31, 22, 29, 27 interact such that cage 27 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 4 to 3 combinations
  174. 167: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 27, 29, 32 interact such that cage 32 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 10 to 9 combinations
  175. 168: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 31, 27, 32, 29 interact such that cage 32 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  176. 169: (4.4) Cage comparison: cages 27, 22, 29, 26 interact such that cage 26 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 6 combinations
  177. 170: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 25, 8, 0, 17, 21 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 9 to 8 combinations
  178. 171: (4.6) Cage comparison: cages 25, 8, 21, 5, 15 interact such that cage 5 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 6 to 5 combinations
  179. 172: (4.2) Cage comparison: cages 5, 22, 0 interact such that cage 0 has incongruous combinations; reduced from 8 to 7 combinations
  180. 173: (3) Region parity: Col 1 must sum to Odd number; cage 22's cells within this region must sum to Odd number; reduced from 5 combinations to 4
  181. 174: (1) Hidden single: 9 in r6c9
  182. 175: (0) Naked single: 3 in r6c8
  183. 176: (0) Naked single: 1 in r5c7
  184. 177: (0) Naked single: 6 in r6c7
  185. 178: (0) Naked single: 9 in r6c9
  186. 179: (1) Hidden single: 2 in r5c8
  187. 180: (0) Naked single: 5 in r5c9
  188. 181: (1.5) Claiming candidates: cage 18 must contain 8 in r5c3, r5c4: from 3 combinations to 2
  189. 182: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 8 contain 7r2; eliminations in r2c3, r2c4, r2c5
  190. 183: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 6 contain 7r3; eliminations in r3c2, r3c6, r3c7
  191. 184: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 18 contain 6r5; eliminations in r5c2
  192. 185: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 22 contain 9r7; eliminations in r7c7
  193. 186: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 30 contain 4c9; eliminations in r3c9, r4c9, r9c9
  194. 187: (3.2) Region parity: Rows 3, 4 must sum to Even number; cage 5's cells within this region must sum to Odd number; reduced from 4 combinations to 2
  195. 188: (1.5) Pointing candidates: all combinations for cage 5 contain 3c2,9c2; eliminations in r5c2, r8c2, r9c2, r1c2
  196. 189: (0) Naked single: 7 in r5c2
  197. 190: (0) Naked single: 3 in r5c1
  198. 191: (0) Naked single: 1 in r8c1
  199. 192: (0) Naked single: 1 in r7c8
  200. 193: (0) Naked single: 4 in r6c2
  201. 194: (0) Naked single: 5 in r7c4
  202. 195: (0) Naked single: 2 in r7c2
  203. 196: (0) Naked single: 3 in r7c6
  204. 197: (0) Naked single: 2 in r8c6
  205. 198: (0) Naked single: 6 in r8c8
  206. 199: (0) Naked single: 5 in r8c2
  207. 200: (0) Naked single: 1 in r1c2
  208. 201: (0) Naked single: 4 in r8c3
  209. 202: (0) Naked single: 6 in r7c5
  210. 203: (0) Naked single: 4 in r7c9
  211. 204: (0) Naked single: 7 in r8c9
  212. 205: (0) Naked single: 7 in r2c8
  213. 206: (0) Naked single: 7 in r9c7
  214. 207: (0) Naked single: 8 in r7c7
  215. 208: (0) Naked single: 9 in r8c7
  216. 209: (0) Naked single: 8 in r1c8
  217. 210: (0) Naked single: 9 in r1c1
  218. 211: (0) Naked single: 7 in r7c1
  219. 212: (0) Naked single: 9 in r7c3
  220. 213: (0) Naked single: 6 in r9c2
  221. 214: (0) Naked single: 8 in r4c2
  222. 215: (0) Naked single: 3 in r9c3
  223. 216: (0) Naked single: 7 in r1c3
  224. 217: (0) Naked single: 5 in r2c3
  225. 218: (0) Naked single: 9 in r9c4
  226. 219: (0) Naked single: 8 in r2c1
  227. 220: (0) Naked single: 6 in r2c9
  228. 221: (0) Naked single: 2 in r2c7
  229. 222: (0) Naked single: 4 in r9c8
  230. 223: (0) Naked single: 8 in r9c9
  231. 224: (0) Naked single: 5 in r6c1
  232. 225: (1) Hidden single: 9 in r2c2
  233. 226: (0) Naked single: 3 in r3c2
  234. 227: (0) Naked single: 3 in r2c5
  235. 228: (0) Naked single: 3 in r8c4
  236. 229: (0) Naked single: 4 in r2c4
  237. 230: (0) Naked single: 1 in r2c6
  238. 231: (0) Naked single: 1 in r9c5
  239. 232: (0) Naked single: 1 in r3c4
  240. 233: (0) Naked single: 2 in r3c9
  241. 234: (0) Naked single: 6 in r3c3
  242. 235: (0) Naked single: 4 in r3c1
  243. 236: (0) Naked single: 6 in r4c1
  244. 237: (0) Naked single: 8 in r5c3
  245. 238: (0) Naked single: 1 in r6c3
  246. 239: (0) Naked single: 8 in r6c4
  247. 240: (0) Naked single: 2 in r6c5
  248. 241: (0) Naked single: 7 in r6c6
  249. 242: (0) Naked single: 6 in r5c4
  250. 243: (0) Naked single: 2 in r1c4
  251. 244: (0) Naked single: 7 in r4c4
  252. 245: (0) Naked single: 4 in r4c5
  253. 246: (0) Naked single: 8 in r3c6
  254. 247: (0) Naked single: 9 in r4c6
  255. 248: (0) Naked single: 9 in r3c8
  256. 249: (0) Naked single: 5 in r4c8
  257. 250: (0) Naked single: 5 in r3c7
  258. 251: (0) Naked single: 4 in r1c7
  259. 252: (0) Naked single: 5 in r1c5
  260. 253: (0) Naked single: 6 in r1c6
  261. 254: (0) Naked single: 3 in r1c9
  262. 255: (0) Naked single: 3 in r4c7
  263. 256: (0) Naked single: 9 in r5c5
  264. 257: (0) Naked single: 4 in r5c6
  265. 258: (0) Naked single: 2 in r4c3
  266. 259: (0) Naked single: 1 in r4c9
  267. 260: (0) Naked single: 7 in r3c5
  268. 261: (0) Naked single: 5 in r9c6
  269. 262: (0) Naked single: 8 in r8c5
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement