6 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-09 0745 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-09 0745 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOnpUIWf12g&lc=z13wtnybyvbewl1bq04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/LCzLnxQx
__

+Brian Hill __ I'll reply again later as I can (I am very pushed for time and could only skim over your replies - I'll read them properly soon).







I just quickly(!) want to stress [again] it's not a "fatal mistake". I need to better explain what I mean by "fatal mistake". This is important: *It would only be a "fatal mistake"* (think of it as a specialised lie system term) *if we saw the "victim" on the ground receiving CPR and could ALSO match that person to the alleged bomber in the second article*.







THAT would be a fatal mistake! Please read over that until it's fully understood!







Everything else is a "verbal discrepancy" or a "factual reporting discrepancy" and CAN be given a "plausible explanation". *A fatal mistake CANNOT be given a plausible explanation*. _Everything else can._







What you've pointed out is a *definite discrepancy* (I agree!) but not a "fatal mistake". YES - so-called "witnesses" can and do lie. To have witnesses who lie is not new and is frequently used (can we be certain that guy speaking was one of the two appearing to give CPR? - though it doesn't matter if we can).







To have "factual errors" in newspapers is not new and is very common.







Read over what I wrote with the Google Plus post (link in previous reply). A witness lying to media is not new nor is it proof of anything. Omitting a factual detail is not new or proof of anything.







Remember - I AGREE WITH YOU! Yes - it could mean someone is lying but people do lie. A fatal mistake is on a level that's beyond that. (It would be like seeing normal gravity during an alleged "ISS interview".)







*What you've pointed out would go a long way toward "waking people up"* but I think that's what "they" want. (That "they" want people to see a "discrepancy" and then shout "must be a hoax"!)







The crucial point: *In this situation it would only be a "fatal mistake" IF we saw the SAME GUY receiving CPR _and also_ get BLOWN UP*.







That would be IMPOSSIBLE (in "real life") and that would be UNDENIABLE PROOF of fraud. _Everything else CAN be denied or "explained away" even if you and I don't accept it._







>> "Event realists" like "BzTruetalk" are already starting to say things like _"I have reasons to doubt this person was there and that he didn't actually witness anything"_ (see my recent video on "BzKermittalk"). <<







This is all a part of the psychological abuse where a population can be told fantastic lies (which create a *false first impression*) but don't know what to believe. Their memories may need to be abandoned later "when the truth comes out". That seems to be the point. (There's more to it but I'm typing quickly as usual and pushed for time.)







It also seems to be intentional. >> *You are noticing the process/strategy*! << It is leading to this outcome: _"How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?"_ (read my G+ post linked above!)


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w