16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-27 1010 +jeranism

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-27 1025 +jeranism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mint1JewWo&google_comment_id=z12ce14arlnnsjn0x22myzojyv20vh3av04
https://pastebin.com/L9h37eA8
__

+jeranism __ *If this message to you goes without a reply then it will definitely be presented in the form of a video along with more Google Plus posts*. Just keep that in mind if you choose to "skip" this because it's "too long" for you.



__



Howdy. Good to hear from you. I notice in your message above that *you didn't mention a single claim* I make that you would consider to be "bullsh!t".



Calling me a "terrible researcher" who makes "bullsh!t claims" *does not make it so*. _You are either *lying*, *emotional* or *both* otherwise you would have given specifics_.



Watch and learn, dummy:



*Speaking of terrible research and bullsh!t claims can you explain why you did not participate in sharing the video about "60-mile high trees" like many of your flat Earth peers did?*



Could it be that you think it is *"terrible research"* and a *"bullsh!t claim"*? _Could that be it, "Jeranism"?_



*According to you*: _"Garbage research from a garbage researcher equals garbage videos"._ *And so if you would dismiss me for those reasons then will you now dismiss every single person involved in peddling the "giant trees" nonsense as well?*



Don't be that kind of hypocrite, "Jeranism".



Perhaps you *won't* dismiss those people because you *don't* think it's "garbage research" and don't think it is a "bullsh!t claim". _Perhaps you actually think there could be something to the "60-mile high giant tree" proposition?_



If so then answer this:



*In your personal and honest opinion which is more likely, "Jeranism": That there could have once been giant "60-mile high trees" or that more simply a group of people decided to make up a bullsh!t claim about giant trees on YouTube in part by doing garbage research where "tree stumps" were compared with "rock formations" that happen to also look like "tree stumps". And then presented this bullsh!t claim with its garbage research to an audience of people you have helped build?*



Let that last sentence sink in, "Jeranism".



*Shame on you for allowing and enabling crooks and swindlers to exploit your audience*.



__





Since I have your attention you can answer one more question.



*Did you or a moderator remove my comment left on one of your "Stephen Hawking" videos?* (from a month ago).



What comment? A link to my thoughtful comment can be found here (it includes a link to the original YouTube comment which is missing): https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/AqvUBQnSFa1





__





I expect *honest* and *direct* answers from you because *honesty* and *directness* is what you are all about - _isn't it?_



I also know that you respond to genuine criticism as proven by your message above and as proven with your "comedy routine" with "Reds Rhetoric" and as proven with your recent substantial video responding to "Jesse Spots" who - as one of your flat Earth peers - expressed concern about the "no forests" video.



*And so there is no good reason for you to treat genuine criticism from Lesta any differently.* _Not unless you are admitting your opinions are not your own and that you are dishonest_.



With bated breath I await your *thoughtful*, *honest* and *direct* answers.



No more games, "Jeranism".


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.