Edward Johnston
Just now · Rogue River, OR, United States
Public Notice Affidavit Fraud upon the court
IN THE 17TH MARITIME ADMINISTRATION COURT LINCOLN OREGON
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
C/O THE PEOPLE, for the Republic for the No.: 131799 DA 13-279
001528________
Untied States of America, as our Creator under God!
Title 12 U.S. Code Sections 95a
edward -malone:johnston, = a living natural Title 19, Ch. 37, of Title 18 Sec. 161.12
American, One of, “We the People” under God
(Eligibility for Compensation)
Petitioner
Petitioner (libellant) should not be
V charged for fees and costs for lawful
Constitutional Rights to petition the
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts of title 12 US Code Ch. 2 Sub. IV
(The People for the Sovereign States for the
Respondent Republic for the United States of America)
______________________________________________________________________________
PETITION FOR A WRIT QUO WARRANTO
FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT
"COMES NOWs a freeman for
PREAMBLE
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and out Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. land edward-malone:johnston, = a living severally disabled natural American on public record , endowed with all natural rights. And, designates Lincoln County, City of Newport as Place of Trial within the State of Oregon, and alleges upon information and belief of a foreign pauper forbidden to own land, arbitrarily, assigned to anyone’s name and used to “represent” radically different entities – but on paper the use of such a system instantly defines what or whom is being talked about – if you know the system. As deceiving the Defendant known as edward - m.: johnston, one of, the people title
The term “animal” means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish and shellfish. MAN IS NOW A COMMODITY TO BUY AND SELL! Is the Corporation now caging man as animals AKA Jails? Therefore are not all courts Kangaroo Courts ran by Jackasses?
, who also lives’ in oregon territory.
Pursuant to the powers of duties bestowed upon us by citizens, aka “Public Servants” the undersigned do hereby resolve that any Federal officer, agent, or employee, regardless of supposed congressional authorization, is required to obey and observe limitations consisting of the enumerated powers as detailed within Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill Of Rights.
THE TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc. No. 2012114776, restated, and I do knowing, willingly, and intentionally adopt, reconfirm, and ratify said as my own duly verified due DECLARATION OF FACTS and any all records thereto and there-under, and by permission of the 1819 Titles of Nobility Amendment, Thirteen, to the U.S. Constitution: Article 1, Section 10, Clause land Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8, of the U.S. Constitution for the Republic for the United States of America. As I, the Plaintiff, a living natural American under our Creator, under God, now comes before this Courtroom, to defend our Republic and my legal rights under the law. On this 1th day of December 2014, at 11:00 a.m., at the 17th administration court, on the 3 second floor, of suite 303, to be heard by acting Judge Thomas Branford or as soon thereafter can be heard.
I Request for Relief
This Petition Quo Warrant to, is the proper procedure for attacking a judgment where the judge and prosecutor do not have their oaths of office as required by the District of Columbia.
Evidence of Dishonor; R – UCC – 3 Part 505,
Plaintiff, (JUDGE THOMAS BRANFORD) and Plaintiffs undersigned Counsels,, Attorney of Record: were indicted under a foreign district and has been serving time in his state as should be charged with a crime known as “personage”. By arbitrarily creating an Estate trust named after the defendant (edward-Malone-johnston), and claiming to own this thing they created, they have falsely claimed to own the Defendants assets and to literally buy and sell “Defendant” on the stock exchange, and ship the Defendant out of port, and tax Defendant (edward-malone:johnston) for doing things never done. After all, there is no law against enslaving an ESTATE trust, is there? Or arresting a slave? Or charging a tax on importing revenue to Puerto Rico? Plaintiff’s have indeed committed a wrongful act, have committed a “False Claims Act” upon this court, and committed FRAUD UPON THE COURT under fraud.
II. History Supreme
8] Enforcement of these corporate statues by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions, [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000] of the American Republic!
• Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334-2000, The, Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
• Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 – 2000 – Supreme Court – Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.
• Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 – 2011 – Supreme Court – Cited by 306 “
• “ Bond v. U.S., 1 F. 3d 631 – 1993 Court of Appeals, 7th – Cited by 66 “
What are the implications of this 2000, U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling?
1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All States Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.]
2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government.
The Supreme Court ruled that Municipalities cannot exert any acts of ownership and control over property that is not OWNED by them, see Palazzolo v. Rhode Island 533 US 606, 150 L.Ed. 2d 592, 121 S.Ct. _(2001) (no expiration date on the taking clause for City's illegal enforcement of its Codes on the man's private property and restricting the man's business), affirming both Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003, 120 L.Ed. 2d 798 (1992).(butterfly activists and Code Enforcement cannot restrict development of the man's private swampland unless they lawfully acquire the land FIRST, surveying with binoculars constitutes a "takings"), and Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes, 526 US 687 (1999), 143 L.Ed. 2d 882 S.Ct.__ (1998).
In the Monterey case, the California private property owner was awarded $8 million for Code Enforcement's illegal trespass and restriction of his business, and another $1.45 million for the aggravation of a forced sale.Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce.
3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System for and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security. Puerto Rico is also the HQ for the Internal Revenue Service.
4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real; they are a fiction and only exist on paper. Chapter 1303: COMMERCIAL PAPER - 1303.01 definitions under UCC 3-103.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statues, codes, and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judges and lawyers know about this? It seems they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did I ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did I ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because I never was told what might happen to me if I agree to contract, and that I had a right to refuse the accommodation!]
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel me and, yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because I have refused to give the court jurisdiction over me!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statues by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions, [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitution Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentence to person under these CIVIL LAWS are in person by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the Country and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if I’m convicted in this Court, for not doing a crime, just to save those from committing a crime upon this Court against me, knowing, this is a fraudulent act upon me, for defending my Liberty for America, the Republic for the United States of America, and my legal rights to the Constitution, than many have a big surprise coming, for not standing with me for our Republic.
11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of children, without our consent? Because I know without our consent, the agents and the officers can be held personally liable for their action! Why, so many children being taken away from their homes against their will. Just a thought, as I like to know why? I know, Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
12] I assume their "courts" still recognize it. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 , International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232
13] cruel and Inhuman punishment and treatment
7 USCA § 136 Page 3 7 U.S.C.A. § 136 (d) Animal The term "animal" means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other. Now you are practicing cannibalism Jack ASS? this is a question.
14] I believe I have now figured out how the Courts are committing intentional fraud against all who enter thereof. Examine DDE's Executive Order 10834 and the Martial Law Flag which falls under Military Regulation. The military are the only one's who can lawfully fly this flag as this Executive Order clearly states " any gold fringe added to an American Flag mutilates the flag and carries a 1-year prison term and is considered as misuse of the Flag.
Ask yourselves this question: When I enter any public building and see a Gold Fringed Flag does this not mean I am under Martial Law and under control by the Military? What then has happened to our civilian government? Constitutional Government? Common Law? Common Law Grand Juries? How then can we have anything but rule by the Military under Color of Law? why are these Judges/Administrators/ Bankers wearing Black Dresses and pretending to be in control as either elected to office or appointed to office? What rank do they have as a civilian whereas their court is by color of law Military? Do you now understand why you are being duped in these "pseudo Corporate Courts"? It is nothing less than a Con job and you are now the crime victim, corpus delicti. You can now sue every one of these Corporate employees for FRAUD.
Whereas we are under military rule then they cannot use the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL/CRIMINAL PROCEDURE against any of us and must charge us under military (JAG) law and regulations. Remember during the 1933 Bankruptcy Acts of War against the men, women and children of this nation all our Law's and Statutes were turned over and became incorporated into 'INTERNATIONAL LAW" and this is why not one "peace officer", Law Enforcement Officer" can produce his copy of the Copywrite permission slip/letter from an "International Tribunal" granting their permission to use them against us/themselves - being they are all incorporation(s). This is why you must, when filing a court action give this pseudo Corporate Court "jurisdiction" as they otherwise have no "jurisdiction" over you a civilian. GET IT?
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOREREIGN and TERROIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic. Since the founding of our country, the “elite” (and their Robber Baron partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy, and altered our form of government and legal system, as I have taken notice of it too. My hope is, you stand with our form of Republic, and will stand with me in this fight against them. That is my Wish!
Plaintiff, Acting judge Thomas Branford , Judge has no Oath Chris Unlawful Hearing 10-28-2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RscVVZmOQug
The State prosecutors, Lincoln County District Attorney Michelle Branam Oaths - Lawless in Lincoln County Oregon May 30, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjVX3iAFc and the undersigned Counsels in this case. Now claim to be Defendants, while Hindering Prosecution. By removing Plaintiffs “Affidavit Criminal Complaint” against them as was addressed by the Plaintiff (edward-malone:johnston). The Defendants under the same styled case listed above, acting under a Corporation within this case. Bruce L McCrum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTJy1JdRrsI
Attorney Misconduct. Behavior by an attorney that conflicts with established rules of professional conduct and is punishable by disciplinary measures.
further slander and attacks on Edward, when Chris Walker kidnap for audio tape my unlawful hearings
Lincoln County Oregon Sheriff, I don't need an order or a warrant... ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zBZd-NS-Cs
Chris Trial 7 November 6th 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkULqNovYxY
Chris Trial 8 November 6th 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPLjjOr2n3E
Rights to Travel Explained Oct 14 City of Toledo Ore City Council
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRSWC-epaxM
Eds unlawful hearing and arrest again 10132014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCQbP6OHEfc
NOTICE:
It is a crime for any government office or any official to auction or otherwise sell in any way, private or business property of any individual WITHOUT FIRST HAVING DUE PROCESS OF LAW, to determine the cause of action and the recourse in law. The sale of any property outside this means is illegal, and all those involved with such a sale, including those purchasing said property, are personally liable for damages, and subject to criminal charges under Racketeering (RIC...
...O) laws, and for violation of civil and Due Process rights. All government officials have the "Greater Duty" to know the law and comply with it, and if you are involved with such an auction without Due Process for the owner, you are in breach of your fiduciary duty and you can be held personally liable by those harmed by this fraud. Any challenge to property taxation or property sale made by any citizen requires you to respond, point by point, and to "prove up" your position in law.
Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment" ... Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643.
III. Quo Warrant to, is the Proper Procedure
A challenge to the jurisdiction of a prosecutor cannot be attacked collaterally, but must be attacked “in a quo warrant to proceeding”. See, for example, Prier to Bail Bonds v. State of Texas, No. 08-96-00342-VB, 6/30/97.
Hand on Hand, with personage comes “barratry” – the crime of knowingly bringing false claims into court. So what happens every day all across America, when charges are brought against the ESTATES of “dead men” who are standing right in front of the judge and jury? Barratry is a Crime that is appropriately named after the “Bar Association”. Robber Baron partners, who are fabricating our history and taken control of our economy and altering our form of government and the legal system.
Look at the front page of any law suit that has been filed in America for the past seventy years and there you will have proof in your hands of both personage and barratry as being committed against the individual American as people, by falsely named as “DEFENDANTS”. They are deliberately confused with foreign estate trusts merely named after them and they are suffering the crime of both personage and barratry.
IIII. Declaration of Facts
The people of these States are, and have a right to be, free and independent, and these rights are derived from the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God". As such, they must be free from infringements on every other natural right whether enumerated or not, (9th Amendment).
We further reaffirm that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people,” (10th Amendment).
Furthermore, we do not maintain that an agency established by the U.S. Congress can develop its own policies or regulation which supersedes the Bill Of Rights or the Constitution, nor does the executive branch have the power to make law, overturn law or set aside law.
Therefore, on order to protect the American people, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the following abuses will not be allowed or tolerated:
UCC Part 1 (a) general provisions: As follows,
A) Confiscating homes or property without the proper compensation or without the consent of the homeowner is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution. The homeowner must show that they surrendered over their property to the estate without being deceived under law, for Profit.
B) Confiscating of firearms, unless having probable cause, as it’s a legal right to own firearms as set forth in our Constitution, as long as compliant with local laws and/or state jurisdictions. The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia
C) Audits or searches of citizens or of private people’s personal affairs or on their personal finances without probable cause, without proper due process of law, and without having proper proof of their affairs, that warrants a local or state jurisdiction. As long as compliant with local laws and our Constitution.
D) Inspections on private people or on private property without probable cause, proper due process of law, and constitutionally not acting within compliance on warrants as required by the 4th Amendment, as issued by local and or state jurisdictions, are prohibited.
E) Detainments or searches on private people without probable cause, without proper due process compliances, on informed consent of a citizen or of private parties, as not acting with compliance to the Constitutional laws on warrants, is prohibited.
F) Arrests with continued incarcerations without probable cause, as charged without complete proper due process of law, including, but not limited to a public and speedy jury trial, within the district courts of that state or local jurisdiction. Constitutionally are not acting in compliance with the U.S. Constitution, is prohibited.
G) Domestic utilization of our nation’s military or the federal agencies operating under powers granted under the laws of war against our American people, thus, acting under violations against our U.S. Constitution. And constitutionally are not acting within compliance with our U.S. Constitution, is prohibited.
H) Arrests or seizures of citizens or of American people or of property without probable cause, as notifying and obtaining the express consent of the local sheriff. Thus, acting on hearsay, and constitutionally not acting under proper due process of law, is propitiated.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the undersigned Sheriffs, Pease Officers, Public Servants and Citizens, do hereby denounce any acts or agencies which promote the aforementioned practices as listed above A through H. All actions by the Federal Government and its agents will conform strictly and implicitly with the principles expressed within the United States Constitution of the Declaration of Independence and under the Bill Of Rights. Sheriff or elected by oath of office to protect lawful American's asset's
There is no grater obligation or responsibility of any government officer than to protect the rights of the people. Thus, any conduct contrary to the United States Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, or the Bill Of Rights will be dealt with as a Criminal Activity, thus, is Treason.
A Reclamation of Independence, gave three types of sovereignty; “de recto” sovereignty (sovereignty by moral principal or right,) and “de facto” sovereignty (sovereignty by practice).
Treason against our Republic for the People for the United States of America continues today, and must be stopped.
The American people have woken, and have come to realize they need to take a stand and fight against Treason and for their Republic! I hope you will join me in this fight, for America.
FACT:
Under Rules of Oregon , it is a Professional Misconduct for a lawyer to;
(a)Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowing to assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) Commits a Criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respect; (c) Engages in conduct involving dishonesty, FRAUD, as deceit or misrepresentation; (d) Engaged in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; (e) State or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official; (f) Knowingly assists a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other laws. Or, violate their Oaths, Oath of Office, and to uphold and to protect our Constitution.
V. Declaration of Facts
Title 12 – Banks and Banking › Chapter 2 – National Banks › Subchapter IV – Regulations of the Banking Business; Powers and Duties of National Banks › 12 U.S. Code § 95a
The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union [2 Black 620, see also Cranel v Nevada, 6 Wall 35].
Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkle, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wiseman” 189 Ark. 675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed, and
V1. Declaration of Facts
Title 12 U.S. Code § 95a - Regulation of transactions in foreign exchange of gold and silver; property transfers; vested interests, enforcement and penalties
The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by section 95a of this title, and are approved and confirmed by house resolution 192.
V1I. Declaration of Facts
Title 12 U.S. Code § 95a – Banks and Banking, Chapter 2 – National Banks, Subchapter IV Regulation of the Banking Business; Powers and Duties of National Banks, › 12 U.S. Code § 95a
Title 12 › Chapter 2 › Subchapter IV › 12 U.S. Code § 95a
(1) During the time of war, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of instructions, licenses, or otherwise
(A) investigate, regulate, or prohibit, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit or payments between, by, through, or to any banking institution, and the importing, exporting, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion, currency or securities; and
(B) investigate, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit, any acquisition holding, withholding, use, transfer, withdrawal, transportation, importation or exportation of, or dealing in, or exercising any right, power, or privilege with respect to, or transactions involving, any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest, by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and any property or interest of any foreign country or national thereof shall vest, when, as, and upon the terms, directed by the President, in such agency or person as may be designated from time to time by the President, and upon such terms and conditions as the President may prescribe such interest or property shall be held, used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States, and such designated agency or person may perform any and all acts incident to the accomplishment or furtherance of these purposes; and the President shall, in the manner hereinabove provided, require any person to keep a full record of, and to furnish under oath, in the form of reports or otherwise, complete information relative to any act or transaction referred to in this subdivision either before, during, or after the completion thereof, or relative to any interest in foreign property, or relative to any property in which any foreign country or any national thereof has or has had any interest, or as may be otherwise necessary to enforce the provisions of this subdivision, and in any case in which a report could be required, the President may, in the manner hereinabove provided, require the production, or if necessary to the national security or defense, the seizure, of any books of account, records, contracts, letters, memoranda, or other papers, in the custody or control of such person.
(2) Any payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery of property or interest therein, made to or for the account of the United States, or as otherwise directed, pursuant to this section or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder shall to the extent thereof be a full acquaintance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation of the person making the same; and no person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance of and in reliance on, this section, or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder.
(3) As used in this subdivision the term “United States” means the United States and any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof; Provided, however, That the foregoing shall not be construed as a limitation upon the power of the President, which is hereby conferred, to prescribe from time to time, definitions, not inconsistent with the purposes of this subdivision, for any or all of the terms used in this subdivision. As used in this subdivision the term “person” means an individual, partnership, association, or corporation.
(4) The authority granted to the President by this section does not include the authority to regulate or prohibit, directly or indirectly, the importation from any country, or the exportation to any country, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission, of any information or informational materials, including but not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds. The exports exempted from regulation or prohibition by this paragraph do not include those which are otherwise controlled for export under section 2404, title 50, Appendix, or under section 2405, title 50, Appendix to the extent that such controls promote the nonproliferation or antiterrorism policies of the United States, or with respect to which acts are prohibited by chapter 37, title 18, § 161.12 Eligibility for compensation.
VIII. Argument
The United States Constitution requires that all elected and appointed officers of the State, before taking the oath of office, shall swear or affirm that they have not paid or promised any money or thing of value or promised public office or employment to secure votes or an appointment (“the anti-bribery oath”). This oath must be filed with the Secretary of State before swearing or affirming to the oath of office, in which the officer swears to faithfully execute his or her duties and preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the state in which they operate. See, e.g. Tex. Const. art. XVI, Section 1.
Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wiseman” 189 Ark. 675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed, and
Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rulemaking power. See Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, 332 US 380 (1947).
Thus having failed to fulfill the Constitutional prerequisites to holding office, the actions of the officer are void. Prior to, supra, pg. 2 of 5; Lone Star Industries Inc. v. Aster, 845 S.W. 2d 334, 337 (Tex., App.-El Paso 1992) (orig. proceeding). Failure to take the oaths of office renders any judicial act void.
In enacting a statute, it is presumed that (1) in compliance with the Constitutions of this state and the United States is intended.
“The only means of challenging the judge’s authority then is through a quo warrant to action, in which the state is an indispensable party. Lewis v. Drake, 641 S.W. 2d 392, 395 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1982) (orig. proceeding).” Prior to, supra, page 3 of 5.
“Elected judges must take a new oath with each new term”. Presto, supra, Note 4, page 5 of 5.
See 28 USC section 453, Judges must take oath of office. As I’m sure neither the judges nor the prosecutors can produce their original oath of office, as required by the Constitution. As required by law, the court must issue an order dismissing the judgment with prejudice. And nor did the Plaintiff, or the Plaintiffs undersigned Counsels show proof upon this court, as claiming had verified a settlement under a foreclosure claim, acting under Section 3-505, - Evidence of Dishonor: UCC – Uniform Part 5, Dishonor article 3 –
Negotiable Instruments (2002) UCC Part 1, (a) general provisions. U.S. Code title 5 GOVERNMENT OREGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331-3333 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court
VIIII. Conclusion
Quo Warrant To, is the proper procedure when the prosecutor and the prier judge in the instant case, did not have the credentials as required by the Constitution and statutes to operate in their official function. Neither prosecutor, nor the judge in this case had their proper credentials and all actions in this case must be declared void abs initio. And, do to the fact. That Judge THOMAS BRANFORD and the undersigned Counsels for STATE, have all committed Fraud upon the Court, under violations to the Constitutional laws and acted against a naturalized citizen. Now acting as Defendants, for STATE in this same Styled case against the Plaintiff known as edward-m: johnston = a living natural American, acting under our Creator our God, for Liberty, Justice, and for Due Elegance to the United States of America.
Knowing that, a Naturalized Citizen had addressed an “Affidavit Criminal Complaint” upon the Plaintiff prier to addressing this Court as the Defendant. And Plaintiff, acting judge Thomas Branford addressing the court on hearsay, without verifying the complaint upon the Defendant known as (edward-malone:johnston). As the Defendant has addressed a (“Motion”) Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Default, Motion for Finial Judgment, Motion for Fraud upon the Court, and yet, have not heard a word from this court upon the Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs undersigned Counsels as addressing an answer upon that request. In violations with the Constitutional laws, and upon my legal rights under due process of law, one of, we the people, who resides in the Oregon territory.
VII. Prayer for Relief
For the reasons stated herein, and supported by law, I now move this court as the Petitioner herein as (edward-johnston) and hereby move this court to declare the actions upon the prier judge, and upon the undersigned Counsels acting as prosecutors hereof, in violations of my due prose’s rights under color of law, and the statutes of the United States Constitution of 19 U.S.C. 1619, as an informant, and issue a writ of quo warrant to, declaring their actions void and of the convictions of the Petitioners Petition null and void upon this court, abs initio. And move this court for damages rendered upon me as (michelle-m: christensen), within this case. For Committing a False Claims Act. And, for knowing about the National Civil Complaint upon the Defendant’s for fraud in reference to the Banks. In the amount for $500,000.00 + Plus, on each individual account who has their names listed within this case hereof. And, for everyday that goes by none answered to this request, add $1,000.00 dollars each day for damages rendered upon me, as Petitioner (edward-malone: johnston). Under UCC-1-103, and Universal law, the governing law laid out in the “OPPT” (One People’s Public Trust) UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc # 2012113593), 12 USC sec 411.
Treaty of 1213 - The Beginning of the Lie | Truth Control
www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie
peace and god bless Jesus
PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved UCC1-308 Sovereign Confidentiality Notice: I am not an attorney,Collage Graduate, medical professional or financial adviser I just a Living Animal who wont's to live in peace walk with Jesus, God Given born right to Subsentence hunt and fisheries,food gathering on all lawful public lands rights of ways, highways,byways, waterways
Respectfully Submitted, As I come in peace
On this day of the lord Monday, December 1, 2014
__________________________________________
Without Prejudice all reserved306 , edward-malone:johnston
C/O 1540 n nye street Oregon territory near toledo
[97391-9998]
Tele: 541 3361233
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY certify that on this 1th day of DECEMBER, 2014 DAY OF THE LORD. A copy of the forgoing was furnished to the 17TH ADMINISTRATION LINCOLN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, and was delivered to Acting Judge Thomas Branford emailed,filed along with furnishing a copy to list of names on the list of those listed for this Hearing. their IS NO GRAND JURY DOCUMENT
BEFORE: Acting Judge Thomas Branford
DATE: Monday DECEMBER 1 20014
PLACE: 17TH ADMINISTRATION LINCOLN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
225 West Olive Street
Rm 202 Newport
OREGON 97365
TIME: 11:00 A.M. OREGON TERRITORY TIME
CC
OREGON SENATE AND HOUSE MEMBERS
FBI, us marshals ,
public notice
Judge has no Oath Chris Unlawful Hearing 10-28-2013
Listen to 3:37 in the video again if you didn't hear what Thomas Branford said about his oath. More to come!!! Stay tun
Judge has no Oath Chris Unlawful Hearing 10-28-201
Listen to 3:37 in the video again if you didn't hear what Tho