RS - KLIMATS

1. World Meterological Organization. 2019. Frequently Asked Questions. World Meteorological Organization website.

2. Moher, D. et al. 2019. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine.

3. Quah, S. et al. 2015. International Encyclopedia of Public Health 2nd Edition. Elsevier Academic Press.

4. Hoffman, J. 2015. Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical Practitioners. Elsevier Academic Press.

5. Cook, J. et al., 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8(2).

6. Doran, P. et al. 2011. Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 90.

7. Stenhouse, N. et al. 2014. Meteorologists’ Views About Global Warming: A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

8. Verheggen, B. et al. 2014. Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming. Environmental Science & technology.

9. Oreskes, N. 2004. The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science 306(5702).

10. Anderegg, W. et al. 2010. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(27).

11. Bray, D., von Storch, H. 2016. The Bray and von Storch 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists 2015/2016. Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht.

12. Rosenberg, S. 2010. Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists’ perspectives. Climate Change.

13. Bray, D. 2010. The scientific consensus of climate change revisited Environmental Science & Policy. Environmental Science & Policy.

14. Carlton, J.S., et al. 2015. The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists. Environmental Research Letters.

15. Fenworth, S.J. et al. 2012. The structure of scientific opinion on climate change. Int. J. Public Opinion.

16. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. 2014.

17. Petersen, A. et al. 2019. Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communication.

18. Beinerte, V. 2019. Zaļš ir jaunais sarkanais. Latvijas Avīze.

19. Berkhout, G. et al. 2019. There is no climate emergency. Clintel website

20. Johnson, S. et al. 2019. Letter signed by “500 scientists” relies on inaccurate claims about climate science. Climate Feedback.

21. Johnson, S. et al. 2019. Letter signed by “500 scientists” relies on inaccurate claims about climate science. Climate Feedback (pielikums: scientific annotation in context). Climate Feedback.

22. Berkhour, G. et al. 2019. There is no climate change. 2019. Clintel website.

23. Collet-White, R. 2019. Climate Science Deniers Planning European Misinformation Campaign, Leaked Documents Reveal. Desmog UK website.

24. Desmog. 2015. Exxonmobil’s $33 million campaign to sow doubt and denial about global warming. Desmog website.

25. Greenpeace. 2018. Koch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine. Greenpeace

26. Influence Map. 2009. Big Oil’s Real Agenda on Climate Change. Influence map website.

27. Internetā šeit.

28. World Health Organization. 2002. Quantifying selected major risks to health. The World Health Report 2002.

29. World Health Organization. 2014. Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death, 2030s and 2050s.

30. Moore, F. et al. New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon. Nature Communations 8(1607). 2017.

31. Schiermeier, Q. et al. 2019. Scientists worldwide join strikes for climate change. 2019. Nature: News in Focus.

32. ‘Listen to the Scientists,’ Greta Thunberg Says to Congress. 2019. New York Times website.