daily pastebin goal
17%
SHARE
TWEET

Untitled

a guest Jun 19th, 2017 45 Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
  1. <@Zaratustra> In 2002 Jonathon Keats held a petition drive to pass 'A = A' as statutory law in Berkeley, California. Specifically, the proposed law stated that, "every entity shall be identical to itself". Any entity caught being unidentical to itself was to be subject to a fine of up to one tenth of a cent. The law did not pass.
  2. <aintaer> dammit
  3. <aintaer> I want that law
  4. <@Cait> I'm wondering if it's possible for an entity not to be identical to itself, now. Quantum is weird to think about.
  5. <aintaer> an entity cannot be unidentical to itself
  6. <aintaer> since the definition of an entity necessarily implies its own identity
  7. <aintaer> Quatum entities are only poorly defined by our inability to observe its identity without it changing
  8. <@Cait> Is it dependent on the definition of 'entity' or the definition of 'identical'?
  9. <aintaer> it's dependent on entity
  10. <aintaer> identical is an identity relationship
  11. <aintaer> entity is how we come to define it
  12. <aintaer> is it through observation or by existence
  13. <aintaer> the former opens up quantum violations of A=A
  14. <aintaer> the latter does not
  15. <aintaer> but once you open that up then the law basically would become entities cannot appear otherwise than they are
  16. <aintaer> which is a silly law and would totally ruin halloween
  17. <@Cait> Yes, but 'identical' needs some qualitative definition to be able to distinguish what 'identical' and 'unidentical' constitute.
  18. <aintaer> I would say for unidentical, an entity with any aspect or parameter unlike the entity in question
  19. <aintaer> This law would not maintain that A and only A = A
  20. <aintaer> But just that A must = A
  21. <aintaer> Hence any B = A would satisfy A = B without violating A = A law
  22. <@Cait> So an entity would have to be unlike itself in some fashion?
  23. <aintaer> yes
  24. <aintaer> to violate this law
  25. <@Cait> That seems reasonable for a start.
  26. <aintaer> I support this law.
  27. <@Cait> It needs to have mandatory enforcement built into it.
RAW Paste Data
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy. OK, I Understand
 
Top