I'm not summarizing this point by point.

***

Overall

***

Magg wins assuming at least one of his characters is in tier, does not matter which.

Donster immediately argues that Aang would go out alone and place himself in a position to be shot by the opposing team at like R1, I was given no reason to believe he would not be picked out by Sam's sensory tech and just shot out of the air. "He flies fast" doesn't really explain to me how well he would avoid shots from two dudes with automatic weapons or rifles.

Even if Donster argued Aang in a way that would make me believe he wouldn't get shot I don't even know what he'd accomplish by flying a 36 mile round trip just to tell Loki where two guys who would just continue moving around after he left would be.

Loki lacks any real answers to stealth argued by Magg and has like 1 argued physical feat, Donster did not really contest the ability for either opponent to just raise their guns and shoot him with bullets more potent than any he is shown to be resistant to. Instead Donster chooses an extremely specific, inefficient lane to argue Aang/Loki into and then just does rebuttals with no clear structure or pushed forward wincons.

Advice to Donster: Try to avoid doing an unorganized list of rebuttals and focus on your wincons. Statposts are not a substitute for posting feats in the actual debate, you need to actually establish your characters as fast or strong or whatever in your arguments. Use bullet points, judges hate reading unstructured blocks of text and rambling. If you are making a claim about an ability or power quantify how good that power is and make it clear why your character will use it. Try to read arguments from more experienced users to improve your formatting/flow. Run better picks.