Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
- Subject: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
- From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:02:37 +0200
- Hi
- I know that Emacs used various VC systems, RCS, CVS, BZR and finally
- git.
- I got interested in the first commits, so I run
- either
- git log --reverse
- Or since I converted the repo to mercurial
- hg up 1
- In both cases I see:
- ommit ce5584125c44a1a2fbb46e810459c50b227a95e2
- Author: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- Date: Thu Apr 18 00:48:29 1985 +0000
- entered into RCS
- commit ff9c6df4b0766bef72f6b1f4c8fca65737d9ad6b
- Author: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- Date: Sat Dec 14 16:58:10 1985 +0000
- Initial revision
- What puzzles me, is that there were so few commits when starting the
- project and
- Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- redhat in 1985, really?
- From wikipedia:
- Founded in 1993, Red Hat has its corporate headquarters
- This is not really a serious issue, but I wondered whether the
- conversion process worked reliable, at least for the first commits.
- Regards
- Uwe Brauer
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement