Andrew Yang Against Circumcisions

I can't help but love this guy.

UBI subsidized by machine labor would work, problem is insulating the wealth and keeping it out of Cartel hands by feeding tens/hundreds of millions of habits.

If we could establish a 100% automatized infrastructure, something like UBI may be inevitable. My preferred alternative would be something that gives people automatized independence, like ways of easily growing your own food or reliably making your own home/car.

He does not seem to be beyond negotiation.

As far as not commenting on the (((real))) problems, I get the distinct feeling he's aware to some degree and genuinely wants to mitigate them.

My current roster goes something like this

Trump >>> Lambright > Johnson >= Paul >= Yang >> Cruz >= Gabbard

In descending order of how much we would have to compromise on letting the broken (((World))) system be.

Choosing between someone like Yang, and someone Libertarian like a Paul, is difficult for me.

I neither want bigger government, nor do I want the free-for-all degenerate landmine that would be libertarianism. Though the right to bear arms, and local militias capable of keeping the military in check, are pretty important to me, too. Hopefully it's not TOO late on that front.

On the other hand, these choices are at least one or more steps better than anyone else available, as far as I know.