7 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-09 1025 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-09 1025 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOnpUIWf12g&lc=z13wtnybyvbewl1bq04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/JDSpugxC
__

+Brian Hill __ I am not engaged in a "counter psy-op". When you express sentiments like that I become dismayed and have to wonder whether that's what YOU are doing. My mistake with most people is that I write too much. It is always better to take things one step and one point at a time. So let's do that now.







DEFINITION: I assert that a "fatal mistake" in the lie system is something that a "normal person" *cannot* provide a "plausible explanation" for AND NECESSARILY PROVES that an event or claim is NOT true/real. A "fatal mistake" - therefore - is something that *even a "normal person"* cannot reject as genuine proof of fraud (i.e., the fraud being a fabricated event) and that it is something that cannot be denied (unless the person is LYING/DISHONEST, INSANE or STUPID). A fatal mistake CANNOT be some kind of [SUBJECTIVE] ERROR. It must BE an actual error and not merely MISTAKEN as an error (that's an important distinction).







I will now give TWO EXAMPLES to illustrate this specific definition:







EXAMPLE #1: A "fatal mistake" for the alleged "ISS" would be to see an "astronaut" doing an interview while we can observe the full effects of gravity. Such as to see him or her JUGGLING while claiming to be aboard the "ISS" and experiencing micro/zero-gravity. That would be undeniable proof that the person cannot be aboard the "ISS" at that time. If it were being alleged he/she was aboard the "ISS" then that would be a "fatal mistake" because it *cannot be* and it *cannot be denied*.







EXAMPLE #2: In this particular situation - a fatal mistake would be (for the love of crikey read over this twice!): *IF we can RECOGNISE the "suicide bomber" from the SECOND VIDEO as being the SAME PERSON on the floor receiving CPR in the FIRST VIDEO* - THEN THAT would be a FATAL MISTAKE*.







It would be a fatal mistake BECAUSE there can be no "plausible explanation" for it. Simply: *There can be NO WAY that footage of a man EXPLODING in one video CAN ALSO be the SAME man in another video showing him to be INTACT*. That would represent a FATAL MISTAKE because it means it can only happen in a FANTASY (i.e., a fabricated event). It would therefore be PROOF of a FRAUD that *even "normal people" cannot deny*. (Anyone with an IQ of at least 100 should not struggle with this.)







__







Do you understand all that I have written above? Do you have any objections to anything I have just written? Do you have any questions? *Do not get stuck on _"but we were told no one was injured in the second article but clearly someone was injured in the first"!_* That is something we will deal with but not until these foundational points have first been ACCEPTED. If you have any questions or objections to what I have written give them in your reply. If you are OKAY with what I have just written then I'll move on to the next point/step. In this fashion - one step/point at a time - I will bring you to the same conclusion OR expose YOU as engaging in a "counter psy-op" of your own. _But you're not doing that, right?_







The first step is to DEFINE what is meant by a "fatal mistake" (if you work with a different definition *then all you're doing is creating a so-called straw-man*). The first step is to give some examples of that definition in action - I have given two - to illustrate the definition. I gave one unrelated example and one directly related example.







Now - do you have any questions or complaints about what I have written above? Was the definition of a "fatal mistake" not clear? Were either or both of the examples not fully understood?







(Sure - "witnesses" lie and the "news media" provides the audience with REPORTING ERRORS ALL THE TIME. Sure - they are a kind of "mistake" [you identified a significant discrepancy! I AGREE WITH YOU] but *upon scrutiny* you will find they are not ever "fatal mistakes". It is critical that you can perceive the difference or you will become trapped in the "hoaxer vs event realist" cycle. What "mistakes" we notice in the news media certainly have the APPEARANCES of being fatal - *but they are not*. It remains subjective. There is always wiggle room. Everything has been explained above. Read my Google Plus post linked above if you haven't already - I describe WHY we are given these discrepancies. But I don't want to go off on a tangent about that just yet. If everything is "okay" then I'll move on to the next point in the SEQUENCE.)

__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w