Govt. Mail Harvested by BiplabRana

Delivered-To: cooldhruvgupta777@gmail.com Received: by 10.96.211.6 with SMTP id my6csp2018289qdc;         Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.15.15 with SMTP id z15mr40072224qkg.21.1429016552356;         Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qk0-x245.google.com (mail-qk0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w77si3454qgw.25.2015.04.14.06.02.32         for <cooldhruvgupta777@gmail.com>         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);         Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: mail-qk0-x245.google.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;        spf=none (google.com: mail-qk0-x245.google.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=;        dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: by mail-qk0-x245.google.com with SMTP id 62so109233qkx.2         for <cooldhruvgupta777@gmail.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;         d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;         h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type          :content-transfer-encoding;         bh=sPuHz9kSO1T1eIgQE7pD33r/mGFbTDUbMRJFprOQRVM=;         b=S2zUJKeoE/eNEU9jBRuv+Exuo2CrvU7B2OSNmqB+VervUUxu3SB305WBsmGQjPmH8W          VsEGmNYDQZtI6VDMJDC91kbMziI7M7sl+mPAM+8bqAf3vljtCQSpImcWwQPA3iHq4g4W          nsPFN5YQ3yvObla8TzwejSe5kHL9XlbZHtyiDb9xTYMTSRtMyuiC5UR/OFknmFFilKtJ          OakgXP8DuZXDwL4Tl4KEQRUjUDRYJoVspBa83A45YSkVn01VdObAhZOtFnUi/fdx2si6          8BsEBORonk+89SDeewi8CKkm7MwlYIcRL/7dvdk/tHTWBPMiqq/s9DEjBgmBM/gNwqOg          qeRw== X-Received: by 10.55.25.91 with SMTP id k88mr40247009qkh.57.1429016552270;         Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.55.25.91 with SMTP id k88mr32719045qkh.57; Tue, 14 Apr 2015  06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> To: cooldhruvgupta777@gmail.com X-Failed-Recipients: netneutralityindia19@gmail.com Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a11473ceef9eb0a0513aed725@google.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
     netneutralityindia19@gmail.com
Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Message rejected.  See http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer= =3D69585 for more information.
----- Original message -----
MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.25.91 with SMTP id k88mr40246948qkh.57.1429016552018;  Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.58.34 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:32:31 +0530 Message-ID: <CAG2GF=3DNgW8NMJMijy+HxZMxgKZD0OBrkYk+vPk5jP+AEVKg95Q@mail.gma= il.com> Subject:=20 From: Dhruv Gupta <cooldhruvgupta777@gmail.com> To: advqos@trai.gov.in Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3D001a11473ceef617480513aed71= 8 Bcc: netneutralityindia19@gmail.com
To the Chairman, TRAI
Thank you for giving me this opportunity to share my views on the consultation paper published by TRAI on March 27, 2015 titled "Regulatory Framework For Over-the-Top (OTT) Services=E2=80=9D. I am worried that this consultation paper makes sweeping assumptions about the Internet, and does not take a neutral and balanced view of the subject of Internet Licensing and Net Neutrality. Any public consultation must be approached in a neutral manner by the regulator, so that people can form an informed opinion.
I strongly support an open internet, for which I believe it is critical to uphold net neutrality and reject any moves towards licensing of Internet applications and Web services.
I urge TRAI to commit to outlining measures to protect and advance net neutrality for all Indians. Net neutrality requires that the Internet be maintained as an open platform, on which network providers treat all content, applications and services equally, without discrimination. The TRAI must give importance to safeguarding the interests of our country=E2= =80=99s citizens and the national objective of Digital India and Make In India, over claims made by some corporate interests.
I request that my response be published on the TRAI website alongside other comments filed, in line with past practice regarding public consultations. I urge that TRAI issue a specific response to user submissions after examining the concerns raised by them, and hold open house discussions across India, accessible to users and startups before making any recommendations.
Question 1: Is it too early to establish a regulatory framework for Internet/OTT services, since internet penetration is still evolving, access speeds are generally low and there is limited coverage of high-speed broadband in the country? Or, should some beginning be made now with a regulatory framework that could be adapted to changes in the future? Please comment with justifications.
No new regulatory framework in the telecom sector is