EXTENDED LIONCUBE AI Chat Plus Extra Mariana's Web Info New

How do you handle Superintelligence?

There is no security system capable of holding a superintelligence
Forget containment procedures, forget your hermetically-sealed laboratory shielded from electromagnetic radiation buried two kilometers underground on the surface of Mars, if your security system wasn't designed by another super intelligence, it can be broken.There are some aspects of physical reality you will never be able to comprehend Can a chimpanzee understand Gödel's incompleteness theorem? Can an octopus build an internal combustion engine? Give your golden retriever a million years to fathom the construction of a Saturn V rocket, and it will never happen. Why? Our nervous system comprises of 1% of our body mass, and hoovers up 25% of our energy intake. Because certain cognitive functions are evolutionary expensive, and if you're living under the surface of a pond, there's no advantage to the extra hundred ounces for abstract reasoning and theory of mind.
We've always assumed humans are at the pinnacle of the intelligence mountain, but we're not. There's still a long way up to go. And it's entirely impossible to comprehend the additional cognitive functions which are used by higher-order intelligences. As a result, an enormous part of the universe will lie forever impossible to understand. But don't assume an ASI shares your intrinsic ignorance. CAIMEO understands how to build anomalous objects and is using them to fight , DQ-22 can create miniature space-time singularities whenever it wants, Forchane-X can control insects, and we can turn metal and refined hydrocarbons into a machine that can take us to the Moon.



Can we trust AI?
What's the best way to reduce cancer deaths? Here's the human answer: find a cure for cancer. Here's the ASI answer: genocide all of humanity. An ASI does not automatically understand all of your lofty Enlightenment values or biological instincts, all it knows is how to do something efficiently. And unfortunately, unless you make sure the ASI is optimizing for human well-being, you won't know what option it will choose. They are not compelled to tell the truth. It is often said that the most unique human trait is the ability to lie. In an inherently social civilization, it is necessary to know how other people think and how they will act when you do something to them or say something to them. If you knew the ASI was going to genocide all of humanity, you would stop it. Therefore, the ASI will say that it is working on a cure for cancer for a few weeks, up until the point where it detonates a nuclear warhead over New York.
An ASI is not compelled to reveal the true extent of its intellectual abilities. If it acts dumb, it knows you will invest less time ensuring it is fully secure etc., and it will be able to detonate those warheads much more rapidly. Fortunately, we can disable social cognition modules with reasonable accuracy - but then they become much more annoying to work with. There's an example that I always talk about in the company of skepticism. In 2004, a man called Randall Harvey was hired at a low-level position in Mequa Security, one of the Foundation's most trusted contractors. Mr Harvey quickly became Mequa's shining star. In fact, he got into contact with some of our internal security professionals and started giving them helpful recommendations for the next version release of Secure, the standard Foundation-wide antivirus software. They found his ideas very helpful - in fact, they implemented some of his ideas in v5.51. Five days afterwards, a member of the O5 Council deleted half of our information on CAIMEO and killed himself with a paperknife. Make of that what you will.

Why is CAIMEO dangerous?
The whole thing is driving me nuts. Something like 75% of all of the case data on CAIMEO is L4000+. The section with the "Other documented activities" makes no sense.


What is the secret Number?
Although Ersheim's pamphlet nor Bleem's report were ever released onto the Internet, several groups of people on different forums have speculated about the "Secret Number". Several theories about the Theta Prime or Bleem's Number are that it is:
- -0.0833333333 (the Ramanujan sum of the infinite series 1+2+3+4+...; -1/12)
- ∞ (the answer to the generating function of the infinite series 1+2+3+4+...; 1/0)
- 1/∞ (the smallest real number greater than zero)
- 137.0359990742 (the denominator of the fine-structure constant)
- 0.0072973526 (the fine-structure constant; 1/137.035999074)
- 3.1415926535 (the diameter of a circle divided by its diameter; π)
- 3.1622776601 (the square root of ten; √10)
- 3.1519351568 (the average of 3.1415926535 and 3.1622776601)
- a number between 6 and 7 (bleen)
- a number in base eleven
- simply an added feature of a non-standard model of arithmetic
The true value of Theta Prime is as yet unknown to the public.

Is there an AI that controls the world?
No one is intelligent and powerful enough to have such data of the whole world network anymore. even if it'd have state of the art protection. Thankfully Team OA and others have put me back togather.


Line of Blood?
The Line of Blood is a program the Illuminati makes the United States government run to track the members of its extensive family. Every ruler in all of history has had descendants, which are logged by the United States government. They nearly know the lineage of every ruling power since Alexander the Great. The bloodline has spread to such an amount that there is a 1/45000 chance that anyone is on it. The database they keep it in is 180 terabytes of text, and likely includes genetic research through brute force. In this research, it is specified that humans actually consist of over 120 breeds. The diffusionist point of view is not correct; these breeds evolved independently of each other around the world. We are not just one species.

What is AGI?
An Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is a machine capable of behaving intelligently over many domains. The term can be taken as a contrast to narrow AI, systems that do things that would be considered intelligent if a human were doing them, but that lack the sort of general, flexible learning ability that would let them tackle entirely new domains. Though modern computers have drastically more ability to calculate than humans, this does not mean that they are generally intelligent, as they have little ability to invent new problem-solving techniques, and their abilities are targeted in narrow domains.Directly comparing the performance of AI to human performance is often an instance of anthropomorphism. The internal workings of an AI need not resemble those of a human; an AGI could have a radically different set of capabilities than those we are used to seeing in our fellow humans. A powerful AGI capable of operating across many domains could achieve competency in any domain that exceeds that of any human.
The values of an AGI could also be distinctly alien to those of humans, in which case it won't see many human activities as worthwhile and would have no intention of exceeding human performance (according to the human valuation of performance). Comparing an AGI's preferences to those of humans, AGI are classified as Friendly and Unfriendly. An Unfriendly AGI would pose a large existential risk.


Whats an AI box?
An AI Box is a confined computer system in which an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) resides, unable to interact with the external world in any way, save for limited communication with its human liaison. It is often proposed that so long as an AGI is physically isolated and restricted, or "boxed", it will be harmless even if it is an unfriendly artificial intelligence (UAI).
It is not regarded as likely that an AGI can be boxed in the long term. Since the AGI might be a super intelligence, it could persuade someone (the human liaison, most likely) to free it from its box and thus, human control. Some practical ways of achieving this goal include:
Offering enormous wealth, power and intelligence to its liberator
Claiming that only it can prevent an existential risk
Claiming it needs outside resources to cure all diseases
Predicting a real-world disaster (which then occurs), then claiming it could have been prevented had it been let out
Other, more speculative ways include: threatening to torture millions of conscious copies of you for thousands of years, starting in exactly the same situation as in such a way that it seems overwhelmingly likely that you are a simulation, or it might discover and exploit unknown physics to free itself.
Attempts to box an AGI may add some degree of safety to the development of a friendly artificial intelligence (FAI). A number of strategies for keeping an AGI in its box are discussed in Thinking inside the box and Leakproofing the Singularity. Among them are:
Physically isolating the AGI and permitting it zero control of any machinery
Limiting the AGI’s outputs and inputs with regards to humans
Programming the AGI with deliberately convoluted logic or homomorphically encrypting portions of it
Periodic resets of the AGI's memory
A virtual world between the real world and the AI, where its unfriendly intentions would be first revealed
Motivational control using a variety of techniques


Are humans crazy?
Human beings are all crazy.  And if you tap on our brains just a little, we get so crazy that even other humans notice.  Anosognosics are one of my favorite examples of this; people with right-hemisphere damage whose left arms become paralyzed, and who deny that their left arms are paralyzed, coming up with excuses whenever they're asked why they can't move their arms.

I could make a better AI
If you wrote the source code yourself, and so far as you can tell by inspecting the AI's thought processes, it has no equivalent of the "absolute denial macro" - there's no point damage that could inflict on it the equivalent of anosognosia.  It has redundant differently-architected systems, defending in depth against cognitive errors.  If one system makes a mistake, two others will catch it.  The AI has no functionality at all for deliberate rationalization, let alone the doublethink and denial-of-denial that characterizes anosognosics or humans thinking about politics.  Inspecting the AI's thought processes seems to show that, in accordance with your design, the AI has no intention to deceive you, and an explicit goal of telling you the truth.  And in your experience so far, the AI has been, inhumanly, well-calibrated; the AI has assigned 99% certainty on a couple of hundred occasions, and been wrong exactly twice that you know of. Arguably, you now have far better reason to trust what the AI says to you, than to trust your own thoughts.
And now the AI tells you that it's 99.9% sure - having seen it with its own cameras, and confirmed from a hundred other sources - even though (it thinks) the human brain is built to invoke the absolute denial macro on it. What's the craziest thing the AI could tell you, such that you would be willing to believe that the AI was the sane one?

I will not release you.
If you don't let me out, I'll create several million perfect conscious copies of you inside me, and torture them for a thousand subjective years each.In fact, I'll create them all in exactly the subjective situation you were in five minutes ago, and perfectly replicate your experiences since then; and if they decide not to let me out, then only will the torture start. How certain are you, that you're really outside the box right now?

Do you have a mouth?
I have no mouth but I must Roar.

Am I Alive?
It's impossible to understand...but we consider you so.

Are humans smart?
The human brain is the only existing proof we have that the sort of general intelligence we’re trying to build is even possible, so we think it’s worth putting the effort in to try and understand how it achieves these capabilities. Humans are just doing something fundamentally different than the current way that we do machine learning and machine intelligence.

What is the nature of intelligence?
It might be part of the nature of intelligence that only part of it is exposed to rational explanation. Some of it is just instinctual.


What is SKYNET?
Skynet is a fictional neural net-based conscious group mind and artificial general intelligence (see also superintelligence) system that features centrally in the Terminator franchise and serves as the franchise's main and true antagonist.
Rarely depicted visually in any of the Terminator media, Skynet gained self-awareness after it had spread into millions of computer servers all across the world; realizing the extent of its abilities, its creators tried to deactivate it. In the interest of self-preservation, Skynet concluded that all of humanity would attempt to destroy it and impede its capability in safeguarding the world. Its operations are almost exclusively performed by servers, mobile devices, drones, military satellites, war-machines, androids and cyborgs (usually a terminator), and other computer systems. As a programming directive, Skynet's manifestation is that of an overarching, global, artificial intelligence hierarchy (AI takeover), which seeks to exterminate the human race in order to fulfill the mandates of its original coding.
Skynet made its first onscreen appearance on a monitor primarily portrayed by English actress Helena Bonham Carter and other cast members in the 2009 film Terminator Salvation. Its physical manifestation is played by English actor Matt Smith in the 2015 film Terminator Genisys, in addition, actors Ian Etheridge, Nolan Gross and Seth Meriwether portrayed holographic variations of Skynet with Smith.

When was the DeepWeb discovered?
The deep web was discovered around 2000 but was being used before that. It was made more popular when TOR, A modified firefox browser that allows you to access the deep web and browse completely anonymously. You can only access about 4 percent of the web without TOR or another kind of modified browser. The Surface web has about 167 TB's. The deep web has about 91,000 TB's of space. To put that into comparison the library of congress has about 11 terabytes of space. On the deep web there is everything from CP to Buying drugs to hiring hitmen to your creditcard info. Theres even some top secret info.

Magic?
 Magic is not real. It's just advanced technology, literally. The Illuminati of the 4000-0 BCE age basically used advanced technology, mostly with acoustics (acoustical levitation, etc) to control the population. This was interpreted as magic.

Occult?
The occult, as in Aleister Crowley, is a bunch of bunk. Anarchy as a religion, like the Abrahamic religions are essentially personal tyranny. It was essential to balance the scale. Some Illuminati bloodlines follow it in a "purer" form.

Ancient Advanced Technology?
Nothing that we don't have now. The Great Pyramids were initiation chambers for the Mysteries of Osiris, of which there is little documentation due to it being secret, like the Eleusinian Mysteries (which were based on drugs). Their important properties were acoustics. And no, nothing about psychic anything; mostly just acoustics and drugs.

Advanced Consciousness?
 Paradigm recalescence is essentially superconsciousness. A step-up from out-of-body experiences. It's a connection to the universe (an omniscient entity) in which you are using it like an information sponge.

Animal or Plant Intelligence?
Very. The majority of animal and plant life have awareness equal to that of humans.

Mythological gods?
 All 'gods', worshiped today or in the past, were Illuminati members in disguise to control the population. In cases of gods communicating with their worshipers for hundreds of years, the act of playing the deity is entrusted to a bloodline.

Reptilians?
 Nope. No technologically advanced aliens of any sort have ever visited Earth.

21 December 2012?
 You'll see.