Guest User

F**k Maddox: Armchair Psychoanalyzing an Armenian Monster

a guest
Sep 1st, 2017
32
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.84 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Maddox would often adumbrate specious arguments with 'rational' critiques that neglect to factor what COULD be considered human error. To provide a heuristic, if someone is upset at the fact that a person they once dated is now dating someone else, what is there to truly be upset about? Can't we use group behavior to understand a partial inevitability of this result? Maddox often needs to ensconce what he would consider to be his superior nature when what makes him human interferes. But if he can indulge in this, then aren't there reasonable rationalizations to NOT criticizing children's artwork? The truth is - like with all other humans - that these social mores and rationalizations are evanescent in the face of our more primal behaviors; they still take precedence. Maddox' more bellicose nature belies a potential resentment of past traumas. His parents - mother especially - are often described by him of being pugnacious. Carrying old world beliefs that often isolate 21st century raised American millenials -- or generation x,y,whatever. Sadly, there is often no way to ameliorate past traumas as a child without busying oneself with ephemera that often doesn't address the internal issues of the child; and often leave parents with the impression that nothing needs to be done, that the issue has already resolved itself -- I mean, look at the kid, he's clearly enjoying himself now. This is an erroneous conclusion formed by those who self-servingly neglect addressing their own faults, and the mistakes they subject others to. These unresolved issues often exacerbate future interactions with the same subject and controls. Unfortunately, it is only the controls that are variable, leading to future interactions that are painted with the same outlook. What Maddox often claims is his iconoclastic worldview is often a rejection of orthodox beliefs that are indiscriminately attacked - despite their potential relevance - because it comes from a similar source -- if not, THE source. This leads individuals into accepting more heterodox ideas, and eventually, belief structures. These ideologies of paltry axioms resonate with victimized persons that often identify consensus as the source of their suffering. A subconscious deflection of the true stressors one finds themselves encumbered with, and should only be considered pernicious. Avoiding the root cause only results in the perpetual extant of these issues. Maddox is putative with being someone who often deflects, and doubles down on issues where he clearly is on faulty ground. His ribald nature being a carry-on from his juvenile attempts to socialize with others. His rodomontade nature an attempt to prop his esteem where his parents failed; often leading to a fragile ego, the esteem only a facade. His selectively sardonic nature a projection that lashes out at the allusions of what those who have harmed him believe.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment