Potential new cynda manips

Potential new cynda manips

a small list of good cyndaquils sorted by stats:

Momstep loses: 32frames i think
gonna list the best manips for each good stat and there corresponding timeloss to the "perfect" manip. Taking pausebuffers, momsteps, fsback , mmback into etc in to account

previous fded manip used 1 start buffer and therefore wasted 96 frames.

1frame manips:

best ffff
x=4_y=2, momStep=0,igt=18/24/30/36, mmback=0, fsback=0, delay=143 DRDRA+DU- 0xffff
wastes 143 Frames, 47 slower than FDED

best fdff
(x=4, y=2, momStep=0, igt=6, mmback=0, fsback=0, delay=73) DDA+RDRU- 0xfdff
73 Frames

best fdef
(x=4, y=3, momStep=1, igt=18, mmback=0, fsback=1, delay=12) DA+RRA+DU- 0xfdef
113 frames

best fddf
(x=4, y=3, momStep=0, igt=24/30, mmback=0, fsback=0, delay=45) DA+RRDU- 0xfddf
45 frames

best feff
x=4, y=2, momStep=1, menuAccount=0, igt=18, mmback=0, fsback=1, delay=14) DRDA+DRU- 0xfeff
115 Frames

best fedf
x=4, y=2, momStep=0, igt=0/6/12/18, mmback=0, fsback=0, delay=4) DDA+RRDS_BU- 0xfedf
95 Frames, 1 frame faster than fded

All of these need to be tesetd for IGT.

Potential 2 framer

(x=4, y=3,momstep=1, igt=18, fsback=1, delay=11) DA+RRA+DU- 0xfcff
(x=4, y=3, momStep=1, igt=18, fsback=1, delay=12) DA+RRA+DU- 0xfdef
144/145 frames, 48/49 frames slower than fded
*needs to be checked for IGT, but huge if viable (i suspect delay 11 to be bad on most IGT frames, hope i'm wrong)