GameFAQs moderators censored this

I love how you think you can claim I'm trolling whatsoever. If you gave a damn about intelligent discussion, you would have proven it *LONG* ago. Instead, you want to tell people to "git gud" even when it proves arbitrary as a result of things like Artillery being rewarded for thoughtlessly moving into positions where they're easily flanked. Oh, there's a term: flanking. Why isn't that used more in the Advance Wars communities? Maybe because it doesn't think to reward flanking better? Instead, it makes battle lines so damn powerful that punching through is a farce. Oh but wait, splash damage would break Advance Wars because of the system of HP influencing attack power and capture speed. When most games don't even use a system like that. Why doesn't Advance Wars counterbalance that system better?

Making the defensive power option through clear flow is how a game competently disrupts battle lines issues. A defensive power character allows for both safer flanking from easier control of the center, as shown here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ_CKgxT8X8
And generally heightened flanking ability that becomes harder to disrupt because it has to be called. Oh but wait, mobile characters can do flanking well. Oh, you mean the same mobile characters that don't care to do flanking in the first place and still manage ridiculous amounts of effectiveness is why they're bullshit? Advance Wars By Web's map makers sure as hell design their maps against Recon FTA for more reasons than Sturm's 1 Movement Cost on all valid terrain. Nobody likes losing just because of raw avatar stats.

Oh wait, that's right, none of my opinions are "valid" because you've been trying to get rid of the troll for years but apparently I haven't been getting the hint, even though there's clear evidence that you haven't been trying to get rid of the *REAL* trolls to begin with. Thanks to MarioMastar pointing out as much on Discord, I know the underlying reason why you'd claim things like that and how literally anything I say is more obnoxious than the brand of material that comes out of the mouth of a person who would mock lust-induced murder victims with freaking Christmas songs: because you just want control of the popular work of other people. You not only want control, you want to abuse it, like some rich snob running their family's fortune into the ground, themselves also caring only about their benefit in the short-term with nary the smallest consideration for either others or the long-term. And that's why you promote the damn harassment: because of your egos.

And GameFAQs mods, since you're reading this because you conveniently want to claim context, I'm calling you out for this crap too. You delete links showcasing how the Advance Wars subreddit's membership earned my ire among others' in fine detail, because apparently I'm "just holding a grudge"? Excuse me? I didn't make people like whoisthisgit also hate things like the "git gud" stupidity. You claim I just literally paid him to make the video, but the fact is, I was already a Patreon to him even before the Advance Wars subreddit ban:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPytiR3gZaQ
All I did was shift my pledge from a corrupt community when they betrayed my trust by siding with the harassment accusations, from the Advance Wars subreddit's membership by the way, that conveniently ignore this video's existence and the corresponding Patreon to prove why I was *NATURALLY* at that community in the first place:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv__lFoVDpw
https://www.patreon.com/MasterKnightDH
Oh look, I've been wanting to make my own game for God knows how long. All I need is some freaking legitimate support. Instead, that community greeted me with incredible bias and their own selfishness.

Well, here's an idea to you and your friends, GameFAQs mods: if YOU want intelligent discussion, all it takes is for you to actually be pleasant. None of this arbitrary punishing people for not being in first place, because that just becomes a ****-waving contest.

You suddenly pretending to care about context is also a showcase of why people hate your guts, because you only "care" when it helps the real trolls. I marked posts for clear-cut trolling AND harassment time and again and you haven't done a damn thing about it. In a site this big, I can't be the only one subjected to that crap, and it shows when you advocate terms like "salt" and "git gud" like they're any signs of creativity--big hint: no they aren't. They're just advocacy of learning to hit things harder like some fucking caveman, contrary to the mere point of a game. Either way, <B><I>YOU, THE GAMEFAQS MODERATORS, CLEARLY ADVOCATE MALICIOUSNESS AND DOXXING. YOU MAKE NOBODY BUT THE BAD GUYS FEEL THE LEAST BIT SAFE.</I></B> The Advance Wars subreddit's admin was guilty of that same hot garbage too, and yet you refuse to realize that that brand of crap, which enables the real trolls, the "git gud" crowd, by showing them they get rewarded for being vile, is why they get to rampage. <B><I>YOU ARE YOUR OWN WORST ENEMIES, AND DELETING THIS POST WILL BE NOTHING MORE THAN CENSORSHIP PROVING AS MUCH TO ANYBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND.</I></B>


Oh, and here's a Discord DM log talking about more of the Advance Wars subreddit's lunacy:

General Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:10 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Advance_Wars/comments/7jqoc9/pvp_grit_is_still_the_worst_co_in_aw3_even_an/
reddit
[pvp] Grit is still the worst CO in AW3. Even an "ideal" inf/arty setup just doesn't work. • r/Advance_Wars
16 points and 19 comments so far on reddit

I'll check back in about an hour or so, whenever I no longer hear you laughing.
Either you'll be dead, or you'll have something to say about that. And yes, I really did count it.
Even if gipface used Colin, he'd only be able to get 113750g worth of units, everything else being equal, unless he used powers.
That's 113750g using Andy's prices.
In order for his army to remotely be a fair comparison to whomever played as Grit, the Grit player would have had to have an army of roughly 107000g a full 16000g than what they actually have on screen.
Then there's the ***** argument about how "Naval units are bad, because having a navy is stupid".(edited)
Naval units are bad, yes. However, I am a strong believer in the fact that they've never been done right throughout the "Advance" Wars series.
The biggest flaw is in their price. If Naval units and Air units had their prices reversed, things would be much, much better.
I don't simply mean make Carriers cost as little as T.Copters and Battleships as little as B.Copters. That's stupid and would not be taking the idea in good faith, but rather adding a spin to it in order to take it out of context. Nay, I mean Naval units should be cheap-ish, while Air units should be more expensive to field, given all the advantages of Air units.
I doubt those complaining loudest about how much Naval sucks over there would show any respect to someone who suggested making a Navy more affordable, or an Airforce harder to obtain. It's like they want the games to be broken, just so they have something to whinge about.
And do you remember that Gamefaqs link?
They started discussing Elder Scrolls... Oh boy, the Champion of Cyrodiil (4), is a god. Something not even Dovahkiin (5) can match.
SushiSquid and mooreandrew58 are smart.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 10:33 AM
So basically, gipface won't answer my questions and is just resorting to name calling.
He seems completely unable to defend his point when I assert his opponent is simply bad.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:05 PM
I love how apparently calling out the AW subreddit's bullshit is trolling by "just insulting the community."
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:21 PM
Tripping in Brawl is completely avoidable. You just have to never dash.
It makes the game so much deeper. Completely removing an option from the player's abilities while leaving it in the game as something they can just keep failing at.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:25 PM
GipFace has been wanting to claim that other players are "scrubs."
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:25 PM
Wanting to?
More like doing it nonstop for years.
Movement space of 9, "kill" range of an additional 3 spaces That's 12 spaces, is there any indirect combat unit with a range of up to thirteen spaces?
Twelve so Grit can reach 13 with his d2d?
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:33 PM
Grit couldn't do it with ANY indirect.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:33 PM
Eleven so Grit can reach it with his COP?
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:33 PM
He'd have 9 spaces maximum with his Battleship.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:33 PM
Ten?
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:33 PM
Under Super Snipe.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:34 PM
Hang on, checking a Carrier's range.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:34 PM
11.
With Super Snipe.
Checking GBW3 indirects to see what can achieve it.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:35 PM
11 under Super Snipe.(edited)
I are more retarded than I thought.
2 spaces short and it's the most expensive unit in the game.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:36 PM
Small Aircraft Carrier in GBW3 has 6 Movement Power and 3 Range. Grit's Super Snipe would let it achieve 12 spaces of range.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:37 PM
One space short.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:37 PM
Anti-Air Missile Launcher in GBW3 has 5 Movement Power and 3 Range. That would be  11 spaces under Super Snipe.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:37 PM
Safe zone is 13 spaces away.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:38 PM
Yeah, that's actually a good point.
Indirects are hot garbage if they have to be overly active frontliners. At least they should be anyway.(edited)
Anti-air indirects? ****ing forget it.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:39 PM
Black Bombs have a 12 space threat radius.
There's literally no counter. Let alone a cost efffective one.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:41 PM
There is an easy answer in GBW3: the Interceptor at 13 Movement Power and 5 Range.
I actually nerfed it in my PALBal patch to 10 Movement Power and 3 Range, but that's still enough.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:46 PM
What kind of merciless ****, worked on that game?
That's a threat range of 18 spaces. It can move from one corner of the map and attack a unit on the other in just four turns.(edited)
And it can escape without putting itself at risk in order to make the attack.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:49 PM
I should point out that the Interceptor only attacks air units. At all.
And fuel actually is a concern in GBW3.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:54 PM
It's weird how it's rarely a concern in Advance Wars, you just have to build a pair of APCs and maintain access to them.
Advance Wars 2, the same thing, but now you have Jess so you can save a little money to put toward offence..
Dual Strike.... Black Boats, so now you can do evverything with a Navy and ccan heal on the go... WHEEE!
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:55 PM
You don't even need a lot of APC support. Planes in AW have 99 Fuel.
Jet planes in GBW3 have Fuel values vary from 50 to 80.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:56 PM
2 APCs = infinite fuel for all units.
Including both APCs.
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:57 PM
And you can't use APCs--or actually, Supply Trucks--to refuel planes either. Well, except the Lite Attacker because that is a VTOL.
Threadnaught - Last Saturday at 7:58 PM
Holy balls, they really streamlined (DUMBED DOWN) this thing for the GBA, didn't they?(edited)
MasterKnightDH - Last Saturday at 7:58 PM
You need a Supply Plane or an airport to refuel jet planes in general in GBW3.



Whaddyaknow. Some actual intelligent discussion about the Nintendo Wars series.

Oh, and oh look, I feel comfortable enough talking with this guy. Maybe because he isn't involving asinine rule enforcement nor is he employing some "first place or bust" bullshit?