INC-9 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 1010 +NikTT09

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 1010 +NikTT09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Tj6k5sDYc&lc=z12fhbfwowivsrxjx04cjntw5nz3j51bdeo
https://pastebin.com/HUEu2Q8i
__

+NikTT09 __ Hey loser - are you done crying? What a bunch hate-filled garbage. Wahh waaahhh. *Calling me a "fraud" does not make me a fraud.* Trying to associate me with other people does not mean I am associated with anyone else. What a little *sook* you are. You continue to play the ball *and not* the man you worthless *spastic.* What you write to me tells me everything I need to know about YOU.




*At least you now admit your BS about "dropped frames" was just a GUESS.* You began by saying with certainty it was a dropped frame. Without a known good example all you have is a *guess* and it doesn't matter how "educated" you may think it is because *WRONG IS WRONG.*




*Everything else you wrote was just the drooling of a retard.* You believe it's real then by golly and by crikey it's real. You are using what little of your intellect you have to overlook what has been kindly pointed out.




This part was cute: *_"No explanation about how they can stay in zero gravity for so long"_* HAHAHAHA you *forgetful spastic* WHAT THE F_KC DO YOU THINK IS BEING POINTED OUT IN THIS VIDEO? *WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A MASKING GLITCH where many smaller duration segments can be cleverly stitched together.* You clueless low IQ loser. It doesn't matter what I say or point out it will just be auto-denied.




If you saw any of what we see as scenes in a movie you wouldn't whisper under your breath: "Oh my crikey, they must have shot that aboard the International Space Station because that is *completely real* and there is no way whatsoever to achieve a similar effect except in a permanent zero gravity environment".




*You believe because you WANT to believe.* You are a disgusting person because of the way you lash out at people who are pointing out obvious problems with what we're being shown. *You have never personally seen the alleged "ISS" through a telescope - you just assume at least one honest person has.* But you're too stupid to wonder why "NASA" themselves do not have any such photos or footage of the alleged "ISS" as seen from Earth on their website.




Your belief was founded and formed on trust and mistaking the appearances of proof for proof. You have an unjustified belief (what is called a "shadow belief" in Lesta's lie system lexicon). All of this continues to go way over your head _just like you imagine the alleged "ISS" does._




If you cannot show known good footage that *replicates the issue as shown in this footage* then you need to shut the f_kc up about it. IF THE FOOTAGE COMING FROM THE ALLEGED "ISS" COULD BE TRUSTED THEN YOU MIGHT BE RIGHT. But that footage *CANNOT* be trusted - especially not when we are scrutinising it. The footage itself is under question and so when there are problems with it we must not ONLY think of "natural explanations" *but we must also be open to other possibilities such as the category of "shenanigans".*




*Pay attention dummy:* If YOU made a recording with YOUR phone or video camera and it had a glitch like that *then it would necessarily be innocent* and it would necessarily have a natural explanation and it would be absurd to suggest your own video recording was somehow fake. Furthermore - it would be unlikely that you were the first to experience that glitch and it would be known about and there would be other "known good" examples of it. Indeed - *your own recording with the glitch would then become an additional "known good" example* for other people to refer to.




*No doubt everything I have written has been lost on you.*




It is lost on you because you are *belief controlled* and can only perceive it as real. Since you believe that it is real all you can do is lash out at me for pointing out *good reasons to doubt it.*




The only thing that necessarily proves anyone is doing anything in space is *sustained duration genuine zero-gravity that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*




Such footage constitutes "sufficient proof" (which is the answer to the question: _"what do I need to see to necessarily know this is true?"_) and to date - _after over a decade and a half_ - no one has ever seen footage that satisfies this simple criteria. *Not even by accident.* Yet "NASA" could if "they" wanted film "sufficient proof" in the next 15 minutes and post it to their YouTube channel. Then - *and only then* - would a belief in a "real and manned ISS" be justified. But still - a known good photo of the alleged "ISS" as photographed from Earth revealing discernible details certified by "NASA" as genuine would be required. Only then would a belief in a real and manned "ISS" would be justified. Until then your belief is unjustified and you are lashing out at me because you haven't got the first clue as to how entire populations (which include you) are manipulated.




What you and many others have relentlessly failed to understand is that to cause a population to believe something (even an "alien invasion") *all you need to do is withhold "sufficient proof" for each claim and give only the appearances of proof.* Your trust and stupidity does the rest (i.e., mistaking proof's appearances as proof). Just so long as an event or claim remains possible to be doubted *then people like you will insta-believe* and suppress any and all doubts when they arise or are proposed. In the absence of sufficient proof your belief is founded and formed on trust and proof's appearances. You believe because you WANT to believe and so you TRUST the people telling you the story - even though they are the same groups of people who have you believe they drop bombs on children for the "greater good" (and so why would lying to children for the "greater good" be an option off the table?!).





The "doubtable moments" I am drawing your attention to are intentional (by "NASA"/"ISS" and pals). It is needed for population control (determining the beliefs of a population). For example, with this clip from "NASA" you just assumed it was a "dropped frame". *You don't know that and you have no proof of that.* If it's "real" then it COULD be that but since we are questioning its "reality" we cannot ASSUME it is real. The glitch serves as a meaningful reason to doubt and you simply suppressed it. *Like you have done a million times before with hundreds and thousands of previous events.* By the time we are adults we are all experts at suppressing doubt. We are all skilled at believing whatever garbage we're told.





You never thought twice about it being a "dropped frame" and you won't go and find a known good example of a "dropped frame" because deep down you probably realise there is no such equivalent "known good" example that resembles what we see and so by NOT finding a "known good" example you can cling to the belief it is "just a dropped frame" and continue hating on me *for the crime of pointing out how populations (which includes YOU) are being day-to-day manipulated.* The lie system has done a real number on you. *So thanks for nothing f_kcwit.*




__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w