Advertisement
Lesta

14 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-24 1415 +Brent Schmidt

Feb 23rd, 2016
76
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.20 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-24 1415 +Brent Schmidt
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObGH71j3z4&lc=z12me1sgplqsjhflu22rtfaypoags5pyp04.1456287508805553
  3. https://pastebin.com/GznZikQ0
  4. standard reply
  5. __
  6.  
  7.  
  8. +Brent Schmidt __ Oh I'm sure your TV does occasionally produce glitches. Everyone is familiar with those. I don't suppose you have any of the glitches we actually see from the alleged "ISS" happening in any known good footage? I suppose the glitches that have been pointed out remind you of what you have experience with and so you simply assume that's what they must be.
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16. Tell me - does your television produce glitches every few minutes or can you sometimes watch an hour completely free of glitches? Can you sometimes watch several hours without any glitches? Because it seems the alleged "ISS" cannot even broadcast twenty minutes (let alone ten - let alone five) without some kind of glitch happening.
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24. Does your television display glitches every few minutes? I doubt it is. But it seems that although the alleged "ISS" can orbit the Earth up to 16 times a day and can broadcast seemingly indefinitely without an interrupted signal the folk at "NASA" cannot send a steady stream without masking glitches. They can show us a 20 to 30 minute "ISS" interview without the signal dropping out once - but they cannot show us that signal without the glitches. Isn't that interesting?
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32. Also - the glitches we see from the "ISS" are consistent throughout their "interview" videos. It is not as though they are different every time. It's always the same couple of types. I doubt you have seen those specific types with your television at home. But if you want to claim they are "natural" then you need to show the same thing happening in "known good" footage. *Near enough isn't good enough.* Please pay attention: *if you cannot show the same glitches occurring in known good footage then you have simply stopped thinking at the first plausible explanation.*
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. But that's not your fault. All stupid people do this - especially when they believe something is real. If the alleged "ISS" is real then the glitches MUST be natural after all. And so if you believe it is real then it is not possible for you to see it any other way. So it is understandable that you would be dismissive of what is being pointed out. It's just that you haven't thought any of this through - probably because you cannot imagine why anyone would lie to you about it.
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48. It's easy to believe it's real after all. You are surrounded by amazing technology. You want to believe you live in a world that has a real and manned "ISS" and you certainly don't want to believe you live in a world that more simply lies about it. Even though you must on some level be aware that we are surrounded by lies and liars. Even though every week there is a news story about some kind of deception or fraud or scandal. Despite that you want to believe that humanity is good and that humanity is doing good things. Even though you accept there are greedy banks and wars waged in countries around the world. Despite that - you cannot imagine anyone would lie to you about this.
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55.  
  56. If the footage purportedly coming from the "ISS" needs to be cleverly stitched together (as it likely would) then we can expect to see masking glitches that resemble common everyday glitches so as to disguise them. After all - they have to be stitched together somehow! So how would you do it? Wouldn't you periodically have an apparent signal glitch? Doesn't that make sense? That way when children and stupid people are watching they will assume it must be due to "antenna reception" etc. After all - why would anyone lie?
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63.  
  64. If you were responsible for joining the segments together it is what you would do. You would have no choice. And it's not like anyone is going to doubt it. After all - it is believable! It's orbiting the Earth up to 16 times a day! Of course there are going to be glitches! (But interestingly the signal never actually fully drops out!) It never occurs to you that we can have one-way video and two-way audio but we never have two-way video. Even after decades of having allegedly manned space stations. Isn't that interesting?!
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. *If what we see is natural and normal then it will exist in known good footage.* I have had people swear to me that the glitches are X or Y or Z but when I examine X, Y and Z there is always something that excludes those possibilities. *Near enough is not good enough.* It is the fact the glitches need to be manually induced that is significant. Random glitches are just that - random - and they can affect any part of the footage or all of the footage. And they may not affect the footage for hours at a time. But with the alleged "ISS" footage there are always these masking glitches (or very subtle "joins"). They cannot go 30 minutes - _let alone 20_ - without a lot of them. But you may say "but it's orbiting the Earth!" - well the satellites it is allegedly using are even higher up and it can all be done without a drop in the signal!
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80. But those darn masking glitches - they cannot ever broadcast without at least some of those.
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87.  
  88. You are describing a real and random phenomenon that LOOKS SIMILAR to what we see with the "ISS". But those glitches are just that - natural and random. Sometimes they affect all of the screen and sometimes they affect a portion. They can often vary. But what we see - over the years - are always consistently similar and can never be found in "known good" footage. And are ALWAYS present! It's not as though there is a 30 minute interview where the masking glitches (or subtle "joining glitches") are not present. But I am sure you have watched your television for hours at a time without seeing any glitches.
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96. You believe it is real because you want to believe it is real. You believe that at least one "expert" who claims they have photographed it with details is not lying to you. You want to believe you live in a world that has a real and manned "ISS" rather than a world that more simply lies about it. It never occurs to you to ask "what's missing?" such as a ten (or five) minute video where "astronauts" are doing as many somersaults as possible or where they are playing a full game of zero gravity ping pong. You have never seen what is called "sufficient proof" - that which necessarily proves the claim is real. Sufficient proof means seeing sustained duration genuine micro/zero-gravity that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103.  
  104. All you have seen are magic tricks that are convincing because you want to believe in magic.
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108. __________________________________________
  109. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  110. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  111.  
  112. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  113. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  114.  
  115. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  116. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  117.  
  118. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  119. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement