8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-25 1740 +Terran Downvale

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-25 1740 +Terran Downvale
https://plus.google.com/112413489582307671009/posts/3iWnbwtAJv8
https://pastebin.com/GGXTwAK0
__


+Terran Downvale __ It does not have a "natural" feel to it. Like with the alleged "Bataclan" street theatre scene - the "action" seemed "linear" rather than chaotic, random, etc.

One thing follows another. This cannot be proved and "they" know it.

*All it takes is for you to get one detail wrong and people will focus only on that and overlook all the other details you have gotten right which lead us to believe it is a contrived scene.*

For example - the woman may have simply been adjusting her bag. It just happened to look like she was pointing. There is no way to prove it either way. But to get one detail wrong gives the opposition an excuse to dismiss the entire claim.

And those who have asserted that they believe it is real are forced to stick with that view. Even more rigid in their views are those who initially call something fake and then switch positions. They have already flip-flopped and so they won't dare switch positions a second time. They are now forced to deny EVERYTHING pointed out to them.

They will simply say: "looks real to me" etc. It's such an easy thing to say and cannot be disputed.

Ultimately, this is where "colour blindness" (as I call it) comes in. To the "colour blind" they are unable to discern between real and pretend. To them it simply looks real. They are powerless to see it any other way.