Jason Lind
   Reply all|
Mon 7/13/2015, 6:27 PM
Thomas Evans <[email protected]>
Sent Items
Sending u one more email after this, need some advice.

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jason Lind
Sent: ‎7/‎13/‎2015 10:35 AM
To: Stephen Haessler
Subject: RE: FW: Would like your honest feedback

What about private research institutions like Lind Innovation?

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820

From: Stephen Haessler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:34 AM
To: Jason Lind
Subject: RE: FW: Would like your honest feedback

Sorry, we don’t serve the public schools.

From: Jason Lind [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 8:34 AM
To: Stephen Haessler
Subject: RE: FW: Would like your honest feedback

He doesn’t (I assume), he attends a Milwaukee public school, starts 7th grade this fall. He’d be the only one in the class (I’d again assume), but I have a feeling navigating the MPS bureaucracy to make that happen would be highly improbable. He’s bored and needs to be challenged, is there any way to backdoor him in? I could make Lind-I a member organization which he is informally my Chief Student. His mom doesn’t want to make that public yet.

I think any smart person can do AP Econ, unless it’s changed to be more math based. And I know how great of a teacher you are so I know he’d be in good hands.

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820

From: Stephen Haessler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:26 AM
To: Jason Lind
Subject: RE: FW: Would like your honest feedback

If he attends a member school.

From: Jason Lind [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 8:08 AM
To: Stephen Haessler
Subject: RE: FW: Would like your honest feedback

Could I place a smart junior high student in one of your distance learning classes (AP Econ preferably). I’m going to have him read random walk this summer.

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820

From: Stephen Haessler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 8:11 PM
To: Jason Lind
Subject: Re: FW: Would like your honest feedback

Hi Jason:

I'm swamped with other work. All the best on the project.

Dr. H

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Jason Lind <[email protected]> wrote:
Dr Haessler,

Been trying to connect, hope all is well.

Vinge got back to me saying he's far behind on his sci-fi contract and can't participate. Merrill said that it was too abstract to really comment but found it interesting, his suggestion was to mathematiclly develop the game theory framework i proposed.

What do you think?

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jason Lind
Sent: ‎7/‎6/‎2015 12:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Would like your honest feedback

Thank you for your excellent initial response to the email I sent you a few years back and I apologize for how I attempted to connect with you subsequently I was not well. I would really like your feedback on this as well.

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820

From: Jason Lind
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 12:17 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: FW: Would like your honest feedback

I might be swinging for the fences with Vinge, he’s a very busy guy. You always taught the solution is obvious, and you should know I always saw the solution (or at least close to it) without doing any work. I think the solution to generate a civilization wide singularity is to move to an AI-assisted barter system, I provide more reasoning for that in my paper On Exchange Medium and Speculation http://www.lind-i.com/Docs/OnExchangeMediumandSpeculation.pdf which I wrote before Economic Circuity.

In it I proposed applying Judea Pearl’s causality statistic framework to Bayesian game theory to compute macro patterns of behavior in non-finite actor games. I have no fucking clue how to do that, but again it is obvious to me that it would work. After I proposed that I applied my new definition of utility and Jim Bryant’s definition of globalization, “The compression of time and space”, and once you place that in the game it became obvious to me that time, space and thought were indeed connected (as Gene Roddenberry posited in Star Trek). Only after I finished and published the paper did I realize the consequences of that and hence I could write out some math.

It’s very possible this is totally insane, and I was manic as hell when I wrote both papers, but if not I think it deserves serious research and I would like to start discussions and bring in experts to further develop the tools necessary to make this framework scientific so we can build better organizations and bring about a singularity.

What do you think?

Btw I hope all is well.

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820

From: Jason Lind
Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2015 11:25 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Would like your honest feedback

First I want to thank you for connecting with me in the past, I also want to apologize for the subsequent attempts a few years back when I was not well. I am bi-polar type-1 with severe manic episodes and was resisting medication because the initial pharmaceutical attempts to control the mania hindered my ability to work. I have been on the same medication cocktail for 2 years now with no episodes.

In a very manic state I wrote this document where I formulated a framework that attempts to unify physics and economics and I think it very much jives with your theories on singularity and thought, at least from what I read in Deepness in the Sky and Fire Upon the Deep.

http://www.lind-i.com/Docs/EconomicCircuitry.pdf

Now initially you may recall I claimed this solved P=NP, I’m not making that claim anymore (although I wouldn’t be surprised if it lead to that).

Basically I say that individual intelligences link themselves in organizations, organizations must be very finite (my diagram shows them as 5 members) because in order for them to have what I call a Delta connection they must significantly share the same values, goals and have a strong working relationship. Organizations can have any set of goals, be it social, economical, spiritual, etc. All intelligences links are treated like electromagnetic fields, in this case thought/information being the current not electrons. Then organizations radiate their own information fields and organizations form relational constructs in a non-finite manor forming a corporation. Corporations then radiate their own fields forming bigger corporational constructs and so on until eventually you have the entire linked civilization.

Further more I say this implies a time-space-thought continuum that is constantly evolving. Time-space is shrinking because technology is making travel and interaction easier and thought is expanding because of the rise of artificial intelligence and the connected population (through both population growth and the ever expanding availability of the internet). I further posit that thought will eventually dominate the spacial relationship and when that happens there will be a singularity. So it is not actually necessary for AI to cause that thought to expand, by introducing tools and developing better organizational models (which will be implemented through simple free market economics, they will simply out compete traditional structures), a singularity could occur without a super intelligent AI.

The equations are written in what I call differential set theory, I made up the syntax combining differential equations with set theory and as far as I know there is no research done on the rules of such a concept. So I only have high level equations, if this were to become serious I’d need someone with a lot more math smarts than me to flesh out the logic.

The QED is premature, that is def a result of my mania, but I find this document very compelling to this day but every time I have attempted to work on this I have gone down a dark path. Do you think there is something to this, or is it total non-sense? If you think there is something to this could we start a private correspondence, maybe brining in a few other experts, to help flesh it out?

Thanks,

Jason Lind
EVP / Chief Software Architect
Lind Innovation
[email protected]
414.788.2820




--
Stephen J. Haessler, Ph.D.
520-429-1223



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6081 / Virus Database: 4392/10211 - Release Date: 07/12/15
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6081 / Virus Database: 4392/10211 - Release Date: 07/12/15
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6081 / Virus Database: 4392/10211 - Release Date: 07/12/15