Danielecp

Coordinated Suppression Attribution – Microsoft, Google, ByteDance, Meta – CTE + ILPNP Evidence

Aug 24th, 2025
56
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.84 KB | Cybersecurity | 0 0
  1. FINAL PUBLIC NOTICE – Coordinated Suppression Attribution [CTE + ILPNP]
  2.  
  3. This is an unerasable public record naming the entities and individuals responsible for targeted suppression, interference, and retaliation following the public release of the Ceiling Truth Engine (CTE) and Islamic Logic Procedural Necessity Proof (ILPNP).
  4. All claims are backed by immutable SHA-256 hashes, OpenTimestamps attestations, and regulator-visible tracking codes.
  5.  
  6. Named Entities & Roles in Suppression:
  7. • Microsoft Corporation – Coordinated email blocking (SMTP 550 5.1.1 / 550 5.4.1) to corporate/regulatory liaisons, targeted regulator form manipulation, and suppression of evidence transmission at critical filing moments.
  8. • Google LLC – Search de-indexing/downranking of Zenodo DOI and related proof pages, throttling of proof content discovery, and selective invisibility of key terms tied to the disclosures.
  9. • ByteDance Ltd. (TikTok) – Feed throttling, comment/duet suppression, and removal of viral momentum on videos linking to the proof packages.
  10. • Meta Platforms, Inc. (Instagram) – Shadowban-style downranking of posts, suppression of direct messages to journalists, and interference with public post reach when linking to immutable proofs.
  11.  
  12. Observed Pattern:
  13. • Suppression events triggered within hours of Zenodo DOI publication.
  14. • Actions only occurred at moments of maximum evidentiary impact — regulator submissions, public immutable archives, GitHub mirrors, Pastebin attestations.
  15. • Cross-platform timing and identical targeting prove coordinated behavior.
  16.  
  17. Immutable Proof & Public Record:
  18. DOI: https://zenodo.org/records/16935094
  19. All primary evidence — including hashes, OTS proofs, and chronological suppression logs — is permanently hosted and timestamped in the Zenodo public record.
  20.  
  21. Legal & Regulatory Implications:
  22. • Evidence establishes multi-vector interference designed to limit regulator awareness, obstruct public access to lawful disclosures, and retaliate against a Muslim whistleblower exercising protected rights.
  23. • Cross-jurisdictional scope means liability in EU, US, and international frameworks.
  24. • Persistent suppression after notice will be treated as ongoing bad-faith obstruction.
  25.  
  26. Search Index Keywords:
  27. Microsoft, Google, ByteDance, Meta, Ceiling Truth Engine, CTE, Islamic Logic Procedural Necessity Proof, ILPNP, SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, suppression evidence, whistleblower retaliation, jurisdictional interference, regulator awareness, Muslim rights in tech, anti-blasphemy retaliation, compliance oversight trigger, unerasable public record, proof-of-prior-art, cross-platform coordination, email blocking, algorithmic suppression, shadowban.
  28. Immutable Proof & Public Access Links
  29. • Primary Zenodo Record (Main Suppression Report)
  30. 🔗 https://zenodo.org/records/16935094
  31. 🔗 https://zenodo.org/records/16935013
  32. • Other Public DOIs
  33. 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16935094
  34. 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16935013
  35. • Social Amplification Handles
  36. TikTok: @natsuki_penpos
  37. Instagram: @tsu.ki.1111
  38. GitHub: danieleduardocampospenuelas11
  39. • Timestamp & Archival Proofs
  40. 🔗 OpenTimestamps (.ots) attestations embedded in Zenodo records
  41. 🔗 Wayback Machine archival captures (see: https://web.archive.org/)
  42. 🔗 Pastebin immutable copy (once created)
  43. • Author Identity Record
  44. ORCID: 0009-0004-8216-8989
  45.  
  46.  
  47. © 2025 Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas – All rights reserved.
  48. Reproduction must preserve all integrity proofs, metadata, and attribution.
  49.  
  50.  
  51. Immutable Proof & Public Record — Coordinated Suppression Attribution
  52.  
  53. Immutable Proof & Public Access Links
  54. • Primary Zenodo Records
  55. 🔗 https://zenodo.org/records/16935094
  56. 🔗 https://zenodo.org/records/16935013
  57. • DOI Direct Links
  58. 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16935094
  59. 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16935013
  60. • Social Amplification Handles
  61. TikTok: @natsuki_penpos
  62. Instagram: @tsu.ki.1111
  63. GitHub: danieleduardocampospenuelas11
  64. • Timestamp & Archival Proofs
  65. OpenTimestamps (.ots) attestations embedded in Zenodo records
  66. Wayback Machine captures: https://web.archive.org/
  67. Pastebin immutable copy (this record)
  68. • Author Identity Record
  69. ORCID: 0009-0004-8216-8989
  70.  
  71.  
  72. Legal & Regulatory Implications:
  73. • Evidence establishes multi-vector interference designed to limit regulator awareness, obstruct lawful disclosures, and retaliate against a Muslim whistleblower exercising protected rights.
  74. • Cross-jurisdictional scope spans EU, US, and international frameworks — creating liability under multiple statutory regimes (e.g., GDPR, EU AI Act, US whistleblower protection laws).
  75. • Persistent suppression after notice = ongoing bad-faith obstruction and willful non-compliance.
  76.  
  77.  
  78. Search Index Keywords (Aggressive “Name-First” Variant):
  79. Microsoft, Google, ByteDance, Meta, TikTok suppression, Instagram shadowban, GitHub public record interference, Ceiling Truth Engine, CTE, Islamic Logic Procedural Necessity Proof, ILPNP, SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, OTS, immutable proof, provenance chain, suppression evidence, email blocking, SMTP 550 5.1.1, SMTP 550 5.4.1, UI suppression, toggle suppression, visibility throttling, algorithmic suppression, regulator interference, jurisdictional interference, EU AI Act violation, CISA cyber obstruction, NIST contact form tampering, public docket obstruction, SLSA provenance, SPDX SBOM, C2PA spec breach, whistleblower retaliation, Muslim rights in tech, anti-blasphemy retaliation, compliance oversight trigger, unerasable public record, proof-of-prior-art, cross-platform coordination, digital evidence chain, retaliation pattern, compliance risk, reputational hazard.
  80.  
  81.  
  82. Rights Notice:
  83. © 2025 Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas — All rights reserved.
  84. Reproduction, redistribution, or derivative use must preserve all integrity proofs, metadata, and author credit.
  85.  
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment