JaysonSunshine

CometBaby hates free speech, and she's emotionally unstable

Jun 12th, 2016
91
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.98 KB | None | 0 0
  1. IMPEACH OBAMA TODAY!!!
  2. [Ekko]
  3. Greetings Mojxax, #politics is currently moderated. If you wait a minute without changing your nickname, you can take part in the discussion (mode +v).
  4. @pilgrim`
  5. I blame Bush
  6. +[pack]
  7. lol
  8. Mojxax
  9. Why should we impeach Obama?
  10. == Cannot send to channel
  11. ⓘ Ekko set mode +v Mojxax
  12. +Mojxax
  13. Why should we impeach Obama?
  14. +Swigert
  15. pilgrim: well of course
  16. why the heck not
  17. ⓘ VonMises set mode -b *!*@107.161.*
  18. +Swigert
  19. but we can do the next best thing: reject Hillary
  20. +Ionizer
  21. obama fails to recognize the biggest attack since 9/11
  22. why shouldnt we
  23. +synaptic
  24. mojxax, illegal war in libya and violations of article iv, section 4
  25. violations of the administrative procedure act
  26. +Swigert
  27. not illegal
  28. +synaptic
  29. which part
  30. +Mojxax
  31. synaptic: did Obama claim the AUMF was the legal basis for the military actions in Libya?
  32. +synaptic
  33. no
  34. he supported the terrorists
  35. +Mojxax
  36. How did Obama support the terrorists in Libya?
  37. +Swigert
  38. was it needed? The president can authorize military action for up to 90 days without Congressional approval
  39. +[pack]
  40. pav, none
  41. +Mojxax
  42. Wikipedia is not citing the AUMF for US military action in Libya.
  43. +synaptic
  44. swigert, only under very specific circumstances
  45. +Mojxax
  46. Apparently validating your claim on that point
  47. +Willpa
  48. The War Powers Act
  49. +synaptic
  50. The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
  51. ^ Section 2(c) of the War Powers Act
  52. +Mojxax
  53. I would agree none of those conditions were met by Libya
  54. @pilgrim`
  55. Obama is worried. damnit its Sunday! I was gong to be ont he 3rd hole. and here peopel want me to speak about ......things
  56. +Mojxax
  57. If the AUMF was not cited
  58. +Swigert
  59. not going to happen now
  60. +synaptic
  61. congress did not declare war against libya, there was no specific statutory authorization for military action in libya, and libya did not attack us
  62. +Mojxax
  63. synaptic: it does appear the Libya military involvement was illegal, then
  64. And I would support his impeachment on that basis
  65. This is a good point, however, to criticize the AUMF in general
  66. +Swigert
  67. ain't gonna happen
  68. +Mojxax
  69. As it is a serious abdication of Congress' power
  70. @pilgrim`
  71. as I said: http://pilgrimer.net/htmls/Politics/To_Trump_or_not_to_Trump.html
  72. +urlinfo
  73. ****
  74. +Mojxax
  75. Never Trump.
  76. +synaptic
  77. http://www.c-span.org/video/?298771-1/us-military-operations-libya&start=2988
  78. +urlinfo
  79. **** US Military Operations Libya | Video | C-SPAN.org
  80. +Mojxax
  81. Trump, among other offenses, as advocated a foreign policy that would include war crimes.
  82. If we're going to impeach the current president on violating the law, we cannot support a candidate who promises to violate the law.
  83. ← Moonlight has quit (Leaving...)
  84. @CometBaby
  85. Who is impeaching obama?
  86. +Mojxax
  87. synaptic: our culture has become extremely fanatical about war
  88. +kanoTRUMP
  89. Mojxax it would NOT advocate war crimes
  90. @CometBaby
  91. Except in your imagination Mojxax
  92. +kanoTRUMP
  93. you are silly
  94. +[pack]
  95. Mojxax, hitlery is constantly violating the law....so who are ya gonna vote for?
  96. +Mojxax
  97. Yes, Obama should be impeached on that basis
  98. But, almost every President is guilty on this front
  99. +kanoTRUMP
  100. geneva conventions do not apply to enemy combatants
  101. +Mojxax
  102. Which speaks to a bigger issue
  103. +kanoTRUMP
  104. only applies to other nations
  105. +Swigert
  106. only Congress can, but they won't. very diffcult process
  107. → bea has joined
  108. +Mojxax
  109. [pack]: Never Clinton, too.
  110. +kanoTRUMP
  111. it would be great if barack hussein obama got impeached
  112. @CometBaby
  113. Mojxax obama will be out of office the end of the year lol
  114. +Mojxax
  115. As she is guilty of serious crimes, including war crimes.
  116. @pilgrim`
  117. most important from that: You will not be able to marry your pet....
  118. ⓘ Ekko set mode +v bea
  119. +Mojxax
  120. CometBaby: I agree that his presidency ends 20 January, 2017.
  121. +[pack]
  122. Mojxax, good. We agree on that.
  123. +Mojxax
  124. Per US Constitution.
  125. ⓘ spdtr is now known as PlainD0rk
  126. +kanoTRUMP
  127. well, you can have sex with your pet in canada
  128. +Swigert
  129. if they couldnt get Bush, what makes you think Obama is in any danger
  130. +Mojxax
  131. [pack]: so, we are left voting for a 3rd party candidate, or not voting.
  132. Those are the only options.
  133. +kanoTRUMP
  134. Mojxax vote trump
  135. +Mojxax
  136. Swigert: you're discussing what is likely to happen.
  137. +[pack]
  138. Mojxax, so, whatcha gonna do?
  139. +Mojxax
  140. synaptic and I were discussing what should happen.
  141. ⓘ CometBaby set mode -v Mojxax
  142. [Ekko]
  143. You've been quieted for 72 hours (mode -v). Parting the channel will result in a 2 hour ban (mode +b).
  144. Mojxax
  145. [pack]: I am currently planning on voting for a 3rd party candidate.
  146. @CometBaby
  147. this guy is nuts
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment