"Morally superior vore Furries"

The only arguments I've ever heard for demonizing underage drawing, and will ever hear, fall into two categories:

1) "This makes me uncomfortable". Insert some brainless rhetoric about how it's "immoral". News flash: pokephilia, furry porn, and beastiality are all called "immoral" by the same social standards. The only excuse I've heard in return was "It's drawn, so it's a fake fantasy! It pokephilia/furries/beastiality doesn't count!". Which works into the entire argument that drawing underage shit is harmless. The only real reason you could say a drawing is immoral is because it makes you uncomfortable. That's not a problem to dislike that shit, it's a problem when you like equally as fucked things and pretend to have some moral superiority in an argument about it. Just say you don't like it, and don't post it on my (christian pokephilia minecraft) server.

You know what makes me uncomfortable? DIGESTION. That shit is way more horrifying than a kid getting raped and living with trauma their entire life. Which I don't even draw, I draw underage looking naked humans getting nommed. You can implant your desire to compare them to an irl kid if you want to, that's on you. I'm not on a moral crusade to pretend I'm above vore-fags who like digestion. Because it's fake shit that's drawn.

2) "You are supplying material to pedophile rapists!" Guilt by association. A hollow excuse to find a way to villainize the artist when you have no grounds to actually call them a pedophile.

There is nothing wrong with drawing underage looking humans. If you want to say it is, you have to say the same for drawn digestion, gore, and beastiality/pokephilia. You can't give me a reason to how it causes no action, violence, trauma, or any other physical troubles. Only mental discomfort (making uncomfortable) to some people. the only action and violence that took place is an artist stroking their pen on a tablet and the beating of meat.

When my human drawings look young, I don't draw like that because I get off to the idea of kids. I draw it because of two main things:
1) Most of my art experience and growth happened because I drew and designed kid character for 4 years. It's a general default to draw humans like that, and it's generally a style.
2) The body size difference just looks more appealing in most vore to me, from an visually appealing perspective.

I don't care about drawing underage shit, but I don't care about that facet of enjoyment from what I draw. I don't write or have characters act like a kid in dialogue bubbles or actions or lose their virginity. Even if that was the fucked material I produced, the entire argument would still stand. But it would just be more uncomfortable and disgusting to those offended. Still back to beastiality and digestion for me. It's disgusting to me, and I'm not pretending I'm above that crowd who likes that fantasy shit.

Whats more "disgusting" than a underage drawing or one that looks like underage... Is the people who didn't care about my human drawings until I drew giantess, my only drawings so far without Pokemon. Only when you don't see a Pokemon to fap to do you see a problem now!

I don't care if you don't like that shit. Stop pretending your such an outstanding moral citizen and that you're above anybody who draws or likes fantasy underage when your into other fantasy taboos. It's all the more reason I don't like furries. Being so hypocritical on the topic of a social taboo, when their entire excuse for being allowed to do their socially (and if you want to go the route of the majority of society thinks) morally wrong fetishes, you cry out "It's just a drawing! An imaginary fantasy!"

Stick to your narrative or shut up. You're not above lolifags ya furfags, stop yapping or I'll get the newspaper.