Lesta

11 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-13 2000 +Baccus93

Jun 13th, 2016
112
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.72 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-13 2000 +Baccus93
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecbu6qNgiTE&google_comment_id=z13rvtdhyq3cgls4g04cjt04tuvlfpybaj4
  3. https://pastebin.com/EZQhiEY4
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Baccus93 __ Tell me why you think my concept of the "lie *SYSTEM*" is anything like the assertions that the Earth is flat or that reality is changing around us.
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. I assert that "sufficient proof" for lie system events and claims (that which necessarily proves an event or claim to be true and real) is intentionally and systematically withheld.
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. That's my assertion. *And that is how you would go about attacking my concept*. You relentlessly skip over this.
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. If you are an intelligent person then the withholding of "sufficient proof" (as though it were a kind of "censorship") would be common sense to you.
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. Do you acknowledge that on children's television there is no swearing and "adult themes"? Do you dismiss it as a "conspiracy theory" to point out that children's television programming is free from vulgarities?
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. If I were to assert that there is no swearing on children's television would you really insist I point to the physical "conspirators" who have made it so? Does that need to be done for you to accept that swearing is kept from children's television?
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Why would the idea of there being "a policy to keep swearing from children's television" be so controversial to you?
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. What I am pointing out with the lie system is analogous. It is - again - not my fault that you are not able to grasp such simple things.
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. __
  40.  
  41. >> *I do not think you are trying to understand. I do not believe you are writing to me with any intention to understand. I believe you are writing to me to reinforce your own bias and mistaken beliefs*. <<
  42.  
  43. __
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. In more than 15 years there does not exist a mere 10 minutes of "ISS" footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51. Given there are thousands of alleged "ISS videos" - many running for longer than an hour - how can it be IF NOT FOR A POLICY - that there is no such qualifying footage?
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. For the love of crikey: >>> *I AM NOT ASSERTING THAT THERE IS NO REAL AND MANNED "ISS"*. <<<
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59. The absence of sufficient proof does not mean a claim is necessarily false.
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. What I am pointing out - _which all intelligent people can grasp_ - is that in the absence of sufficient proof *all belief in an event or claim (however true it may be) is founded and formed on trust and accepting/mistaking proof's appearances for proof*.
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. ::sigh:: I find that I am again repeating myself.
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. I don't think any of this is sinking in.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. I don't think you understand that if a "theory" is TRUE then while it can be falsified IT NEVER WILL BE - IF IT IS TRUE.
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. Just as a LIE cannot be PROVEN TRUE something that is TRUE cannot be proven FALSE.
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83. This is something you have not grasped.
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. You are not understanding. You are latching onto FRAGMENTS of my words and TWISTING them to fit your misunderstanding.
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. >>> *The concept of the lie system can be falsified*. It is not like the "flat Earth" or the "Mandela Effect". For example - that is why I have repeatedly asked you about the alleged "Christina Grimmie" shooting. <<<
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95. Since you continue to avoid addressing that question you either do not understand why I am asking you about it - or you do not want to acknowledge the point I am making.
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99. You have imagined the "lie system" to mean something that it is not. No wonder you object to it.
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103. __
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107. Finally - you don't seem to have understood why I included the "flat Earth" and the "Mandela Effect" in my video. It is because they are reflexively absurd to NORMAL PEOPLE. Your teacher. Your doctor. Your engineer. Your psychiatrist.
  108.  
  109.  
  110.  
  111. By being reflexively absurd it allows charming and charismatic people to create the belief that there are real people who really believe the Earth is flat and that reality is changing around them.
  112.  
  113.  
  114.  
  115. But I will not digress any further.
  116.  
  117.  
  118.  
  119. If you feel you are wasting your time - stop replying. I am okay with you misunderstanding my ideas. Don't feel too bad - they are out of the reach of most people.
  120.  
  121.  
  122. __________________________________________
  123. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  124. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  125.  
  126. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  127. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  128.  
  129. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  130. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  131.  
  132. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  133. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment