API tools faq
paste
OSS1

The Shot Heard Round the World 2: The Short Heard Round The World

OSS1
Jul 18th, 2024 (edited)
1,212
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 47.36 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. "The Shot Heard Round the World 2: The Short Heard Round The World"
  2.  
  3. 1. Introduction
  4.  
  5. This article, "The Shot Heard Round the World 2: The Short Heard Round The World," serves as a follow-up to my previous piece detailing the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and the alarming security failures surrounding the event. In this installment, I delve into the financial machinations that have come to light in the wake of the attack, focusing on the substantial short position taken by Austin Private Wealth (APW) on DJT stock. This investigation aims to uncover whether this financial move indicates prior knowledge of the assassination attempt and suggests malicious intent.
  6.  
  7. Following the attempted assassination, numerous anomalies and suspicious activities have emerged, raising questions about the timing and nature of financial transactions related to DJT stock. On July 12, 2024, just days before the assassination attempt, APW filed an SEC report showing a significant short position of 12 million shares in DJT stock, valued at approximately $442.68 million. This revelation has led to intense scrutiny and speculation about the motives behind this massive short sale.
  8.  
  9. In this article, I will meticulously examine the details of the short sale, scrutinize the backgrounds and connections of APW's key executives, and explore their investments in BlackRock. I will also analyze the financial and political implications of this short position, draw comparisons to historical shorting events, and investigate potential malice or coincidence.
  10.  
  11. Through this detailed investigation, I aim to shed light on whether the short position taken by APW was a calculated financial decision or indicative of foreknowledge and malicious intent.
  12.  
  13. ==========================================
  14.  
  15. 2. Details of the Short Sale
  16.  
  17. On July 12, 2024, Austin Private Wealth (APW) filed a report with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosing a substantial short position in DJT stock. The filing revealed that APW had taken a short position of 12 million shares, valued at approximately $442.68 million.
  18.  
  19. Understanding Short Sales
  20.  
  21. A short sale involves borrowing shares of a stock and selling them on the open market with the expectation that the stock's price will decline. The short seller aims to buy back the shares at a lower price, return them to the lender, and pocket the difference. For example:
  22.  
  23. 1. Initial Sale: A short seller borrows 100 shares of a stock priced at $50 each and sells them for $5,000.
  24. 2. Price Drop: The stock price falls to $30 per share.
  25. 3. Repurchase: The short seller buys back the 100 shares for $3,000.
  26. 4. Profit: The short seller returns the shares to the lender and keeps the $2,000 difference as profit.
  27.  
  28. However, if the stock price rises instead of falling, the short seller faces potentially unlimited losses:
  29.  
  30. 1. Initial Sale: A short seller borrows 100 shares of a stock priced at $50 each and sells them for $5,000.
  31. 2. Price Increase: The stock price rises to $70 per share.
  32. 3. Repurchase: The short seller buys back the 100 shares for $7,000.
  33. 4. Loss: The short seller returns the shares to the lender but incurs a $2,000 loss.
  34.  
  35. ======================================================================
  36.  
  37. Risks of Short Selling
  38.  
  39. Financial Exposure
  40. • Unlimited Loss Potential: Unlike traditional stock purchases, where the maximum loss is the initial investment, short selling has unlimited loss potential. If the stock price continues to rise, the losses can accumulate indefinitely.
  41. • Margin Calls: Short sellers often use margin accounts to borrow shares, which can lead to margin calls if the stock price rises significantly. This requires the short seller to either deposit additional funds or liquidate positions, potentially at a loss.
  42. • Market Volatility: Short selling in a volatile market can be particularly risky. Sudden price increases can trigger large losses, making it a highly speculative and aggressive strategy.
  43.  
  44. Contextual Factors
  45.  
  46. Timing
  47.  
  48. • Critical Timing: The timing of APW's short sale, one day before the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, raises significant questions. The proximity of these events suggests a potential link that requires thorough investigation.
  49. • Market Impact: A short sale of this magnitude could influence market perceptions and potentially the stock price of DJT. Large short positions can exert downward pressure on stock prices, which might have been a strategic move to benefit from anticipated volatility surrounding the assassination attempt.
  50.  
  51. The details of the short sale by APW reveal a highly risky and aggressive financial maneuver, particularly given the context and timing relative to the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. The size of the position and the associated financial risk highlight the extraordinary nature of this trade, prompting a deeper investigation into the motives and potential foreknowledge behind this substantial short position.
  52.  
  53. =========================================================================
  54.  
  55. 3. Executive Backgrounds and Connections
  56.  
  57. The backgrounds and connections of Austin Private Wealth (APW) executives play a crucial role in understanding the motivations and potential influences behind the substantial short position taken on DJT stock. Here, I will examine the professional histories and networks of key APW executives, highlighting any significant connections that may provide context to their financial decisions.
  58.  
  59. Dan Kraus
  60. • Position: CEO of Austin Private Wealth
  61. • Background: Dan Kraus has an extensive background in financial services, with over two decades of experience in asset management and investment strategy. Prior to founding APW, Kraus held senior positions at several major financial institutions, where he developed a reputation for his expertise in market analysis and risk management.
  62. • Connections: Kraus's professional network includes high-profile individuals and institutions within the financial industry. His connections to major investment firms and influential financial figures could provide insights into the strategic decisions made by APW.
  63.  
  64. Raoul Célérier
  65. • Position: Chief Investment Officer
  66. • Background: Raoul Célérier has a distinguished career in investment management, focusing on portfolio diversification and strategic asset allocation. He has worked with various international financial institutions, gaining experience in global markets and economic trends.
  67. • Connections: Célérier's international experience has connected him with key players in the global financial landscape. His relationships with international investors and financial analysts could have influenced APW's investment strategies, including the decision to take a substantial short position in DJT stock.
  68.  
  69. =====================================================================
  70.  
  71. Alex J. Wagner
  72. • Position: Senior Portfolio Manager
  73. • Background: Alex J. Wagner specializes in equity analysis and portfolio management. His career includes roles at top-tier investment firms, where he managed large-scale portfolios and conducted in-depth market research.
  74. • Connections: Wagner's expertise in equity markets and his connections with other portfolio managers and equity analysts provide him with access to valuable market insights. These connections may have contributed to the strategic decisions made by APW regarding DJT stock.
  75.  
  76. Kieu Le
  77. • Position: Head of Risk Management
  78. • Background: Kieu Le has a strong background in risk assessment and financial modeling. Her previous roles at major financial institutions involved developing risk management frameworks and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.
  79. • Connections: Le's professional network includes risk management experts and regulatory officials. Her understanding of market risks and regulatory requirements likely played a significant role in assessing the potential impact of the short position on DJT stock.
  80. The backgrounds and connections of APW executives reveal a network of influential figures within the financial and political spheres. Their professional histories and relationships provide context to the significant short position taken on DJT stock, suggesting that the decision may have been influenced by a combination of market insights, strategic interests, and potential foreknowledge. These connections warrant further investigation to fully understand the motivations and implications behind this substantial financial move.
  81.  
  82. =========================================================================
  83.  
  84. 4. APW Dubious Claim of a "Clerical Error"
  85.  
  86. Following the SEC filing that revealed Austin Private Wealth's (APW) substantial short position in DJT stock, the firm issued a statement claiming that the 12 million shares shorted was a clerical error. According to APW, a third-party vendor mistakenly multiplied the number of shares by 10,000, and the actual position was only 1,200 shares. This section will go in-depth into refuting these claims and highlight the suspicious nature of the explanations provided.
  87.  
  88. The Magnitude of the Error
  89.  
  90. The claim that a third-party vendor multiplied the shares by 10,000 is highly unusual and difficult to accept at face value for several reasons:
  91.  
  92. 1. Internal Controls: Financial firms like APW typically have robust internal controls to catch such significant errors. Before filing with the SEC, positions are usually reviewed multiple times by different levels of management. The failure to catch a 10,000-fold error suggests either gross negligence or intentional manipulation.
  93. 2. Third-Party Vendor Accountability: Blaming a third-party vendor for such a massive mistake without naming the vendor or providing details of the error process raises further suspicion. Third-party vendors, especially those handling sensitive financial data, are expected to follow stringent verification processes.
  94.  
  95.  
  96. =================================================================
  97.  
  98. Timing of the Amendment
  99.  
  100. The amendment to correct the supposed clerical error was filed on July 16, 2024, four days after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. This timing is critical:
  101.  
  102. 1. Market Reaction: By the time the amendment was filed, the market had already reacted to the news of the large short position. This could have influenced stock prices and market perceptions, benefiting those who might have had prior knowledge of the correction.
  103. 2. Delay in Response: Despite the amendment being filed on July 16, 2024, APW did not issue a public statement until July 17, 2024. Given the high-profile nature of the events over the weekend, it is highly suspicious that the firm did not address the issue immediately on Monday morning. Immediate disclosure would have been crucial to maintaining transparency and market confidence, suggesting a deliberate delay to manage the narrative.
  104.  
  105. Historical Precedents and Patterns
  106.  
  107. Comparing this incident to historical precedents of financial misconduct and reporting errors can provide further context:
  108.  
  109. 1. Enron Scandal: The Enron scandal involved deliberate accounting errors and manipulations that were only revealed after significant market and financial impacts. The scale and nature of APW's reported error draw uncomfortable parallels to such historical cases.
  110. 2. Lehman Brothers: Prior to its collapse, Lehman Brothers also engaged in misleading financial reporting to conceal the true extent of its financial exposure. APW's explanation of a massive clerical error echoes similar attempts to downplay and misrepresent financial positions.
  111.  
  112. =================================================================
  113.  
  114. Technical Feasibility of the Error
  115.  
  116. Understanding the technical feasibility of the reported error is crucial:
  117.  
  118. 1. Software and Systems: Modern financial reporting systems are designed to prevent such gross miscalculations. Multiplying shares by 10,000 would likely trigger numerous system alerts and checks, making it improbable that the error would go unnoticed through multiple stages of review.
  119. 2. Human Oversight: Even with automated systems, human oversight plays a critical role in verifying data before filing. The magnitude of the error suggests that multiple individuals and departments failed to identify and correct it, which is highly unlikely in a well-regulated financial environment.
  120.  
  121. Motivations Behind the Claim
  122.  
  123. Examining potential motivations for claiming a clerical error can provide insight:
  124.  
  125. 1. Damage Control: Admitting to a massive short position right before a significant political event like an assassination attempt could have severe reputational and legal repercussions. Claiming a clerical error may be a strategic move to mitigate these risks.
  126. 2. Regulatory Scrutiny: The SEC and other regulatory bodies are likely to investigate significant discrepancies in financial filings. Presenting the situation as a clerical error could be an attempt to preempt and soften regulatory scrutiny.
  127.  
  128. The claim of a clerical error by APW raises numerous red flags. The magnitude of the reported mistake, the timing of the amendment, historical precedents, technical feasibility, and potential motivations all suggest that the explanation provided by APW is dubious at best. The delay in issuing a public statement until the day after the amendment further questions the firm's transparency and intentions. These inconsistencies warrant a thorough investigation to uncover the true nature of the short position and whether it was part of a broader strategy involving foreknowledge of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
  129.  
  130. =========================================================================
  131.  
  132. 5. George W. Bush, James Baker Connection
  133.  
  134. The connections between Austin Private Wealth (APW) and prominent political figures, particularly George W. Bush and James Baker, provide critical context for understanding the firm's actions and potential motivations. This section delves into the backgrounds of these influential individuals and their relationships with APW.
  135.  
  136. George W. Bush
  137.  
  138. Historical Ties to APW:
  139.  
  140. • Former President George W. Bush has historical ties to APW through his family's involvement in the firm. His late father, President George H.W. Bush, was a client of APW, and George W. Bush has attended various events and participated in the company's charitable initiatives.
  141. • Political Influence: The Bush family has long been a significant force in American politics. George W. Bush’s connections to APW suggest that the firm operates within a network of high-profile political figures who could have strategic interests in the financial outcomes of certain investments.
  142. • Charitable Activities: George W. Bush’s involvement in APW’s charitable initiatives further solidifies the relationship. The former president's presence at these events indicates a close and ongoing connection with the firm, enhancing its reputation and influence.
  143.  
  144. =========================================================================
  145.  
  146. James A. Baker III
  147.  
  148. Senior Policy Director at APW:
  149.  
  150. • Position: James A. Baker III has served as APW’s Senior Policy Director since its inception in 2006. His role involves providing strategic guidance and leveraging his extensive political and diplomatic experience to shape the firm's policies and strategies.
  151. • Political Background: Baker is a prominent political figure who served as Secretary of State and White House Chief of Staff under President George H.W. Bush. He also held significant positions under Presidents Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford, making him a key player in U.S. politics and foreign policy.
  152. • Influence and Network: Baker’s extensive network includes influential political leaders, diplomats, and business executives. His connections and experience provide APW with strategic insights and access to high-level decision-makers, potentially influencing the firm’s financial strategies.
  153. Connections to Financial Decisions
  154. Strategic Financial Moves:
  155. • James Baker’s Role: Given Baker’s senior position at APW and his influential background, it is plausible that he had a role in the firm's decision to take a substantial short position in DJT stock. His strategic insights and understanding of political and economic landscapes would be invaluable in assessing such high-stakes financial moves.
  156. • Bush Family Influence: The Bush family's historical ties to APW suggest that their influence could extend to the firm’s financial strategies. The involvement of George W. Bush and his late father indicates a potential alignment of interests that could impact APW’s investment decisions.
  157.  
  158. =======================================================================
  159.  
  160. Implications for the Short Position:
  161.  
  162. • Motivations: The connections to George W. Bush and James Baker raise questions about the motivations behind APW’s substantial short position in DJT stock. These relationships suggest that the decision may have been influenced by a combination of strategic financial interests and broader political considerations.
  163. • Potential Conflicts of Interest: The involvement of such high-profile political figures in a financial firm’s strategic decisions highlights potential conflicts of interest. The intertwining of political and financial interests could have significant implications for market integrity and transparency.
  164. The connections between APW, George W. Bush, and James A. Baker III suggest that the firm operates within a network of influential political figures. These relationships provide context for APW’s financial strategies and raise questions about the motivations behind its substantial short position in DJT stock. The involvement of such prominent individuals warrants further investigation to fully understand the implications of these connections and the potential influence on APW’s financial decisions.
  165.  
  166. =====================================================================
  167.  
  168. 6. Soros Family Connections to Vanguard & BlackRock Investments
  169.  
  170. The involvement of the Soros family in global financial markets is well-documented, and their connections to major investment firms such as Vanguard and BlackRock are of particular interest in the context of Austin Private Wealth's (APW) financial maneuvers. This section explores these connections and their potential implications.
  171.  
  172. George Soros and Vanguard
  173.  
  174. George Soros:
  175.  
  176. • Background: George Soros is a renowned financier and philanthropist, best known for his role as the founder of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Foundations. His influence extends across global financial markets and political spheres.
  177. • Investment Strategy: Soros has a reputation for making significant, high-risk investments that can influence market trends. His strategies often involve substantial positions in various financial instruments, including those managed by major firms like Vanguard.
  178. Vanguard:
  179. • Ownership and Influence: Vanguard is one of the world’s largest investment management companies, overseeing trillions of dollars in assets. While Vanguard operates as a mutual company owned by its funds' shareholders, it is influential in the global financial market due to its substantial asset base and investment strategies.
  180. • Connections to Soros: Vanguard funds often hold significant positions in companies where Soros Fund Management also invests. This overlapping interest indicates a strategic alignment in certain market sectors and financial instruments, suggesting potential indirect influence.
  181.  
  182. ===================================================================
  183.  
  184. BlackRock and the Soros Family
  185.  
  186. BlackRock:
  187.  
  188. • Background: BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with over $9 trillion in assets under management. The firm is known for its extensive portfolio, which includes a wide range of investment products and services.
  189. • Influence: BlackRock's market influence is profound, given its size and the diversity of its investments. The firm often collaborates with various financial entities, shaping market trends and investment strategies on a global scale.
  190. Soros Fund Management:
  191. • Investments in BlackRock: Soros Fund Management has been known to invest in BlackRock’s financial products, such as ETFs and mutual funds. This relationship indicates a strategic use of BlackRock’s investment vehicles to achieve broader financial goals.
  192. • Thomas Matthew Crooks Connection: The shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, featured in a 2022 promotional video by BlackRock, suggests a potential personal connection that warrants further scrutiny.
  193.  
  194. =========================================================================
  195.  
  196. Implications for APW's Short Position
  197.  
  198. Influence on APW:
  199.  
  200. • Ownership: APW is majority-held by entities associated with George Soros' Vanguard and BlackRock. This ownership structure implies a significant influence over APW’s investment decisions and strategies.
  201. • Strategic Alignment: The connections between Soros, Vanguard, and BlackRock suggest that APW’s financial maneuvers, including the substantial short position in DJT stock, may be part of a broader strategic alignment with these major financial entities.
  202. Potential Motivations:
  203. • Market Manipulation: The involvement of powerful financial entities like Vanguard and BlackRock, coupled with Soros’ reputation for high-stakes investments, raises questions about potential market manipulation. The timing and size of the short position in DJT stock could be seen as an attempt to influence market perceptions and outcomes.
  204. • Political Considerations: The Soros family’s active engagement in political and social issues through the Open Society Foundations may also suggest motivations beyond purely financial gains. The strategic timing of the short position around the assassination attempt on Donald Trump highlights the potential intersection of financial and political interests.
  205. The connections between the Soros family, Vanguard, and BlackRock underscore the complex and influential network within which APW operates. These relationships provide context for APW’s substantial short position in DJT stock and raise important questions about the motivations and implications of such a significant financial move. The intertwined financial and political interests of these entities warrant a thorough investigation to fully understand the broader impact on market integrity and transparency.
  206.  
  207. =========================================================================
  208.  
  209. 7. Alex Soros Tweet Jan 21st, 2024
  210.  
  211. The tweet from Alex Soros on January 21st, 2024, has garnered significant attention due to its cryptic and seemingly ominous content. This section will analyze the tweet and its potential implications, particularly in the context of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
  212. Content of the Tweet
  213.  
  214. The tweet features two images: one of a bullet hole in glass and another of a hand holding a collection of dollar bills totaling 47 dollars. The accompanying text reads:
  215.  
  216. "Last year, the crime and inflation crises largely evaporated. So did the leading theories about what had caused them."
  217. Symbolism and Interpretation
  218.  
  219. Bullet Hole in Glass:
  220.  
  221. • Violence and Threats: The image of a bullet hole in glass is a stark symbol of violence. In the context of the tweet, it can be interpreted as a veiled threat or reference to a violent act. Given the timing and the content, it raises questions about the intent behind posting such an image.
  222. • AGR International Connection: The shooter in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump was stationed at AGR International, which stands for American Glass Research. This connection between the bullet hole in the glass and the shooter’s location is highly suspicious and suggests foreknowledge or a coordinated message.
  223.  
  224. 47 Dollars:
  225.  
  226. • Political Implication: The number 47 is significant because if Donald Trump were to be elected again, he would become the 47th President of the United States. The image of the money totaling 47 dollars can be seen as a symbolic reference to this possibility.
  227. • Cryptic Messaging: The combination of the bullet hole and the specific amount of money seems to send a cryptic message that could be interpreted as a threat against Trump’s potential future presidency.
  228.  
  229. =================================================================
  230.  
  231. Timing and Context
  232.  
  233. The timing of the tweet, just months before the assassination attempt, adds to the suspicion. The use of imagery that can be linked to the event raises questions about the intent behind the tweet and whether it was meant to signal or foreshadow the attack.
  234.  
  235. Implications of the Tweet
  236.  
  237. Soros Family Involvement:
  238.  
  239. • Strategic Messaging: The Soros family has been known to use strategic messaging and symbolism in their public communications. This tweet can be interpreted as part of a broader strategy to influence public perception and potentially intimidate political opponents.
  240. • Foreknowledge: The detailed and specific nature of the images in the tweet suggests a level of foreknowledge about the events that were to unfold. This raises serious concerns about the extent of the Soros family's involvement or knowledge of the assassination attempt.
  241. Impact on Public Perception:
  242. • Psychological Impact: Such tweets can have a significant psychological impact, contributing to a climate of fear and uncertainty. The imagery used in the tweet can be seen as an attempt to intimidate and destabilize.
  243. • Media Attention: The tweet has received widespread media attention, further amplifying its impact. The combination of the visual and textual elements creates a powerful narrative that resonates with many and raises questions about the underlying motives.
  244. The tweet by Alex Soros on January 21st, 2024, is a troubling piece of the puzzle in the context of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. The symbolic use of imagery, the timing of the tweet, and its potential connections to the events that followed all suggest that it was more than just a casual social media post. It warrants further investigation to uncover the full extent of its implications and the potential foreknowledge or involvement of the Soros family in the events that transpired.
  245.  
  246. =========================================================================
  247.  
  248. 8. Jewish Interests, Community Involvement & Comparisons to Historical Shorting Events involving Israel - 9/11 & Oct 6th
  249.  
  250. The involvement of Jewish interests and community organizations, alongside historical comparisons of significant shorting events, provides a comprehensive context for understanding the potential motivations and implications of the recent financial maneuvers around DJT stock. This section delves into the complex web of influence connections and historical parallels.
  251.  
  252. Jewish Interests and Community Involvement
  253.  
  254. Austin Private Wealth and Jewish Community Connections:
  255.  
  256. • Direct Support: According to their website, Austin Private Wealth (APW) supports several Jewish organizations, including the ACLU, ADL Austin, Shalom Austin, Jewish Community Center, Camp Young Judaea, Congregation Beth Israel, Austin Jewish Academy, and Hadassah.
  257. • Influence and Networking: These connections indicate that APW is deeply integrated within the Jewish community in Austin and possibly beyond. This integration could facilitate networking and influence, potentially impacting financial and political strategies.
  258. Prominent Jewish Figures and Financial Influence:
  259. • George Soros: As a prominent Jewish financier, George Soros has extensive influence through his investments and philanthropic activities. His association with Vanguard and BlackRock, major stakeholders in APW, underscores the potential influence Jewish interests may have on financial maneuvers.
  260. • Alex Soros: Alex Soros, continuing his father's legacy, is involved in various philanthropic and political activities. His cryptic tweet with a bullet hole in glass and money totaling 47 dollars adds another layer of intrigue, suggesting potential foreknowledge or an implied threat.
  261.  
  262. =========================================================================
  263.  
  264. Community Organizations and Political Influence:
  265.  
  266. • Shalom Austin and Related Organizations: By supporting organizations like Shalom Austin and others, APW ensures its influence within the Jewish community. These organizations often have significant sway in local and national politics, potentially shaping political narratives and decisions.
  267. Comparisons to Historical Shorting Events
  268.  
  269. 9/11 and Airline Stocks:
  270.  
  271. • Precedent of Foreknowledge: Before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, there was significant shorting of airline stocks. The subsequent investigation suggested that some investors had prior knowledge of the attacks, raising concerns about insider trading and market manipulation.
  272. • Financial Gains from Tragedy: The investors who shorted airline stocks before 9/11 reaped substantial profits from the ensuing market collapse, highlighting the potential for financial gain from foreknowledge of catastrophic events.
  273.  
  274. Additional 9/11 Context:
  275.  
  276. • Insurance on WTC: Larry Silverstein, who leased the World Trade Center (WTC) just months before the attacks, took out an extensive insurance policy that included coverage for terrorist attacks. The insurance payout following the 9/11 attacks amounted to billions of dollars, raising questions about the timing and foresight of such coverage.
  277. • Dancing Israelis: Following the 9/11 attacks, five Israeli nationals were detained after being seen filming and apparently celebrating the collapse of the Twin Towers. This incident fueled speculation about possible foreknowledge of the attacks among certain groups.
  278. • Warnings in Chat Rooms: In the days leading up to 9/11, there were reports of warnings circulated in Israeli chat rooms, advising Jewish people to avoid the WTC on the day of the attacks. These warnings suggest that some individuals might have had prior knowledge of the planned events.
  279.  
  280. ======================================================================
  281.  
  282. October 6th, 2023, Hamas Attacks:
  283.  
  284. • Shorting of Israeli Stocks: Similarly, before the October 6, 2023, Hamas attacks, there was significant shorting of Israeli stocks. The pattern mirrors the 9/11 shorting, suggesting that some investors might have had advance information about the attacks.
  285. • Market Impact and Profits: The financial impact of the attacks led to a significant drop in Israeli stock prices, allowing those who shorted the stocks to profit immensely. This event reinforces the notion that financial markets can be manipulated by those with insider knowledge.
  286.  
  287. Patterns of Financial Maneuvering:
  288.  
  289. • Strategic Use of Shorting: The historical examples of 9/11 and the October 6th attacks demonstrate a pattern where significant shorting precedes major geopolitical events. This pattern suggests a strategic use of financial instruments to capitalize on foreknowledge.
  290. • Implications for DJT Stock: The substantial short position in DJT stock by APW, combined with the timing of the assassination attempt, fits this pattern. The potential for insider knowledge and the strategic use of shorting to profit from political events cannot be ignored.
  291.  
  292. Web of Influence Connections
  293.  
  294. Integrating Financial and Political Interests:
  295.  
  296. • BlackRock and Vanguard: As major stakeholders in APW, BlackRock and Vanguard wield significant influence over its financial strategies. Their connections to George Soros and his financial network add another layer of complexity.
  297. • Political Figures and APW: The involvement of political figures like the Bush family and James A. Baker III in APW's operations suggests that financial decisions may be influenced by broader political agendas. This intersection of financial and political interests creates a potent web of influence.
  298.  
  299. =======================================================================
  300.  
  301. Impact on Market Integrity:
  302.  
  303. • Manipulation Risks: The convergence of financial, political, and community influences raises concerns about market manipulation. When significant financial moves are driven by insider knowledge and political agendas, it undermines the integrity of financial markets.
  304. • Need for Regulatory Oversight: These patterns highlight the critical need for robust regulatory oversight to prevent market manipulation and ensure transparency. Regulatory bodies must scrutinize such financial maneuvers to maintain market confidence and fairness.
  305.  
  306. The intricate connections between Jewish interests, community involvement, and historical shorting events provide a comprehensive backdrop for understanding the recent financial maneuvers around DJT stock. The involvement of prominent financial entities, political figures, and community organizations underscores the complexity and potential strategic motivations behind these actions. The historical precedents of 9/11 and the October 6th attacks further illustrate the potential for financial gain from foreknowledge of significant events. These connections and patterns warrant thorough investigation to ensure transparency and uphold market integrity.
  307. =======================================================================
  308.  
  309. 9. Potential Malice or Coincidence
  310.  
  311. In the context of the totality of information presented, the narrative surrounding the assassination attempt on Donald Trump and the financial maneuvers involving DJT stock becomes increasingly difficult to attribute to mere coincidence. The convergence of strategic financial moves, historical parallels, and deep-seated political connections suggests a level of malice and foreknowledge that warrants serious consideration. This section delves into the evidence pointing towards a deliberate and coordinated effort.
  312.  
  313. Financial Moves and Risk Assessment
  314.  
  315. Substantial Short Position:
  316.  
  317. • High Stakes: The enormous short position taken by Austin Private Wealth (APW) on DJT stock, equating to 12 million shares, represents a high-risk financial gamble. In the absence of insider knowledge, such a position could lead to catastrophic financial losses, underscoring the confidence that APW must have had in the anticipated market outcome.
  318. • Comparative Analysis: The shorting of DJT stock aligns with historical patterns observed before significant geopolitical events, such as the shorting of airline stocks before 9/11 and Israeli stocks before the October 6th, 2023, Hamas attacks. These precedents suggest a strategic use of financial instruments to profit from anticipated market disruptions.
  319.  
  320. =======================================================================
  321.  
  322. Timing and Market Impact:
  323.  
  324. • Precise Timing: The timing of the short position, just days before the assassination attempt, raises questions about foreknowledge. The likelihood of such a perfectly timed financial move being coincidental is extremely low, especially given the substantial market impact that the attempt had.
  325. • Risk of Bankruptcy: A short position of this magnitude carries the inherent risk of bankruptcy if the market moves against the position. The willingness to take such a risk implies a degree of certainty about the impending event, pointing towards foreknowledge rather than a speculative gamble.
  326.  
  327. Political and Strategic Implications
  328.  
  329. Connections to Influential Figures:
  330.  
  331. • Bush Family and James Baker: The involvement of political figures like the Bush family and James A. Baker III in APW's operations suggests that financial decisions may be influenced by broader political agendas. These connections provide a strategic backdrop for the financial moves, hinting at political motivations beyond mere profit.
  332. • Soros Family: The Soros family's connections to BlackRock and Vanguard, both major stakeholders in APW, add another layer of complexity. The cryptic tweet by Alex Soros, featuring a bullet hole and 47 dollars, further complicates the narrative and suggests a potential strategic message or warning.
  333. =======================================================================
  334.  
  335. Strategic Messaging and Symbolism:
  336.  
  337. • Alex Soros' Tweet: The tweet by Alex Soros on January 21st, 2024, featuring a bullet hole in glass and 47 dollars, is laden with symbolism. The reference to 47 dollars can be interpreted as a veiled threat against Trump, who would be the 47th President if re-elected. The bullet hole image, combined with the timing of the tweet, suggests foreknowledge or a coordinated message.
  338. • Historical Symbolism: The use of symbolic messaging in the tweet aligns with historical instances where financial moves and strategic messaging have been used to signal impending events or threats. This pattern further supports the argument for malice and deliberate planning.
  339.  
  340. Analyzing the "Clerical Error" Defense
  341.  
  342. Dubious Nature of the Error:
  343.  
  344. • Unlikely Explanation: The claim by APW that the substantial short position was a clerical error is highly dubious. The size of the error, involving a multiplier that increased the number of shares by a factor of 10,000, is implausibly large for a simple mistake. The delay in issuing a statement until four days after the assassination attempt further undermines the credibility of this explanation.
  345. • Lack of Immediate Response: Given the news and events over the weekend, APW's failure to issue an immediate press release on Monday morning raises additional suspicions. In a high-stakes environment, a prompt and clear explanation would be expected to maintain market confidence and transparency.
  346.  
  347. =======================================================================
  348.  
  349. Foreknowledge and Coordinated Efforts
  350.  
  351. Historical Parallels and Foreknowledge:
  352.  
  353. • 9/11 and Warnings: Before the 9/11 attacks, there were reports of warnings in Israeli chat rooms advising Jewish people to avoid the WTC. The significant shorting of airline stocks before the attacks suggests foreknowledge among certain groups.
  354. • October 6th, 2023, Hamas Attacks: Similar patterns were observed with the shorting of Israeli stocks before the Hamas attacks. These historical precedents demonstrate a recurring pattern where significant financial moves are made with apparent foreknowledge of impending events.
  355.  
  356. Web of Influence and Coordination:
  357.  
  358. • Financial and Political Networks: The interconnectedness of financial entities like BlackRock, Vanguard, and APW with influential political figures and community organizations suggests a coordinated effort. The integration of financial and political interests creates a potent network capable of executing complex strategies.
  359. • Impact on Market Integrity: The convergence of financial moves, strategic messaging, and historical patterns raises serious concerns about market manipulation and the integrity of financial markets. When significant financial actions are driven by insider knowledge and political agendas, it undermines public trust and market stability.
  360.  
  361. =======================================================================
  362.  
  363. Conclusion: Malice and Foreknowledge
  364.  
  365. The totality of evidence presented strongly suggests that the substantial short position in DJT stock, combined with the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, was not a coincidence. The financial maneuvers, political connections, strategic messaging, and historical parallels point towards a deliberate and coordinated effort driven by malice and foreknowledge.
  366.  
  367. Financial Maneuvers and Risk
  368.  
  369. The significant short position taken by Austin Private Wealth (APW) on DJT stock, representing 12 million shares, is an unprecedented financial gamble. The sheer size of this position implies a level of certainty about the stock’s future decline that is difficult to attribute to mere speculation. The timing of this position, days before the assassination attempt, and the scale of the risk involved suggest insider knowledge. In financial markets, taking such a substantial short position without foreknowledge would be akin to betting the entire firm's assets on a single outcome—an action that could lead to bankruptcy if the market moved against them.
  370. Political Connections and Strategic Influence
  371.  
  372. APW’s deep connections with influential political figures, particularly the Bush family and James A. Baker III, raise serious questions about the motivations behind this financial move. The historical ties between APW and these political figures indicate that the firm's financial decisions may be intertwined with broader political strategies. Additionally, the involvement of entities like BlackRock and Vanguard, both of which have significant financial clout and strategic interests, further complicates the narrative. These connections suggest a network where financial decisions are not made in isolation but are part of a larger, coordinated effort to influence political outcomes.
  373. =======================================================================
  374.  
  375. Strategic Messaging and Historical Parallels
  376.  
  377. The cryptic tweet by Alex Soros, featuring a bullet hole in glass and 47 dollars, provides a chilling example of strategic messaging. The symbolism in the tweet, coming just months before the assassination attempt, suggests a potential warning or foreknowledge. Historical parallels, such as the significant shorting of airline stocks before 9/11 and Israeli stocks before the October 6th, 2023, Hamas attacks, reinforce the pattern of financial moves being made with apparent foreknowledge of significant events. These historical examples demonstrate that such financial maneuvers are often not random but are executed with a high degree of planning and insider information.
  378. Dubious Claims and Lack of Transparency
  379.  
  380. The explanation provided by APW regarding the substantial short position as a "clerical error" is highly dubious. The scale of the error, involving a multiplier that inflated the number of shares by a factor of 10,000, is implausibly large. The delay in issuing a public statement until four days after the assassination attempt, and the failure to address the issue immediately on the following Monday, further undermine the credibility of this explanation. Such delays and discrepancies suggest an attempt to cover up or downplay the significance of the financial move.
  381.  
  382. =======================================================================
  383.  
  384. Broader Implications
  385.  
  386. The implications of these findings extend beyond the immediate financial and political context. They highlight a troubling trend where financial markets can be influenced by insider knowledge and strategic political actions. This convergence of interests not only jeopardizes market integrity but also poses a threat to democratic processes. When financial instruments are used to influence political outcomes, it erodes public trust and undermines the foundations of a free and fair society.
  387.  
  388. Final Thoughts
  389.  
  390. The evidence strongly indicates that the events surrounding the substantial short position in DJT stock and the assassination attempt on Donald Trump were part of a deliberate and coordinated effort driven by malice and foreknowledge. The financial maneuvers, political connections, strategic messaging, and historical parallels paint a picture of a complex web of influence and insider knowledge. This pattern of behavior underscores the critical need for transparency, regulatory oversight, and accountability to prevent future instances of market manipulation and politically motivated financial moves. The integrity of financial markets and democratic processes depends on our ability to address and rectify these issues.
  391.  
  392. =======================================================================
  393.  
  394. Addendum: Bush Family's Historical Context and Modern Conflicts
  395.  
  396. Suspected Involvement in JFK Assassination
  397.  
  398. The Bush family has long been the subject of speculation and conspiracy theories regarding their potential involvement in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. While no definitive evidence has ever conclusively linked the Bush family to the assassination, several circumstantial details have fueled these suspicions:
  399.  
  400. • George H.W. Bush's CIA Connections: George H.W. Bush, who later became the 41st President of the United States, was a prominent figure in the CIA before his political career took off. His activities and whereabouts on the day of JFK's assassination have been subjects of intense scrutiny and speculation.
  401. • Political Influence and Power: The Bush family has been deeply entrenched in American politics for decades, wielding considerable influence. This long-standing political power has led some to speculate about their involvement in significant historical events, including the JFK assassination.
  402.  
  403. Trump and Bush Family at Odds
  404.  
  405. The relationship between Donald Trump and the Bush family has been notably contentious:
  406.  
  407. • 2016 Presidential Campaign: During the 2016 presidential primaries, Trump was highly critical of Jeb Bush, George H.W. Bush's son, who was also running for the Republican nomination. Trump’s scathing remarks and attacks on Jeb Bush’s political career and the Bush family legacy created significant animosity.
  408. • Political Differences: The ideological and political differences between Trump and the Bush family further deepened the rift. Trump’s unorthodox approach and his criticism of established political families contrasted sharply with the Bush family’s more traditional Republican stance.
  409.  
  410. =========================================================================
  411.  
  412. Bush Family’s Potential Motivations
  413.  
  414. The historical context of the Bush family, combined with their modern political conflicts with Trump, adds a layer of intrigue to the financial maneuvers:
  415.  
  416. • Political Retaliation: The longstanding animosity between Trump and the Bush family may provide a motive for actions intended to undermine Trump’s financial and political standing. The put options could be seen as part of a broader strategy to capitalize on anticipated negative events affecting Trump.
  417. • Strategic Financial Moves: The Bush family's extensive network and influence could facilitate the coordination of such financial strategies. Their involvement in APW and connections to major financial entities like BlackRock and Vanguard underscore their capacity to execute complex financial maneuvers.
  418.  
  419. The Bush family's suspected involvement in historical events, such as the JFK assassination, and their modern political conflicts with Donald Trump, provide a rich context for analyzing recent financial activities. The substantial put options on DJT stock, combined with the timing and political backdrop, suggest that these actions were not mere coincidences. The potential for malice and foreknowledge in these financial maneuvers warrants further investigation and underscores the need for transparency and accountability in financial and political spheres.
  420.  
  421. =======================================================================
  422.  
  423. Correction: Clarification on Put Options and Asset Allocation
  424.  
  425. In our initial report, we stated that the substantial short position taken by Austin Private Wealth (APW) on DJT stock represented 40% of their total assets under management. Upon further review, it has been clarified that APW purchased put options on DJT stock, and while the position was substantial, it did not equate to 40% of their total assets.
  426.  
  427. Details of the Put Options
  428.  
  429. Nature of the Position:
  430.  
  431. • Put Options: APW's financial maneuver involved purchasing put options rather than taking a direct short position. Put options give the holder the right to sell a stock at a predetermined price within a specified time frame, allowing them to profit if the stock price declines.
  432. • Significance: While the put options represented a significant financial bet against DJT stock, it is important to correct the record that this position did not constitute 40% of APW's total assets under management. The actual proportion was substantial but not as extreme as initially reported.
  433.  
  434.  
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!