API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

TRK

a guest
Jun 23rd, 2017
557
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 22.67 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. [10:13:31] <mime> Hello, fellow European and transatlantic skeletons!
  2. [10:13:33] <The_M> oh yes she is
  3. [10:13:51] <The_M> I have the distinct feeling thats the universe I should be in
  4. [10:14:52] <The_M> the only interesting thing about mulitverses is the mechanism by which it splits
  5. [10:14:59] <The_M> and ....
  6. [10:15:10] <The_M> its actually quite a good explanation
  7. [10:15:52] <The_M> each universe splits into an infinite number of possible outcomes
  8. [10:16:03] <The_M> each atom moving a certain way
  9. [10:16:45] <The_M> poof, new universe
  10. [10:18:00] <mime> Are you afraid you have been misplaced, The_M?
  11. [10:18:45] <The_M> well...I have this distinct feeling of 'noooooo this is not what is supposed to happen'
  12. [10:19:27] <The_M> but we should realize that civilisation does not progress in a straight linear fashion
  13. [10:19:29] <mime> Hehe
  14. [10:19:43] <The_M> the fall of rome and all that
  15. [10:20:35] <mime> Well, there is certain historical causation between events and such in world history. Time however is not linear, it seems.
  16. [10:21:09] <The_M> yeah
  17. [10:21:16] <The_M> but its not assured
  18. [10:21:21] <The_M> not even in the long run
  19. [10:21:33] <The_M> humanity can still be destroyed
  20. [10:21:44] <The_M> civilisation even
  21. [10:21:51] <mime> Yes?
  22. [10:22:12] <The_M> yeah, why not
  23. [10:22:20] <mime> It would be a massive accomplishment to destroy all of humanity, it seems very undoable.
  24. [10:22:29] <The_M> really
  25. [10:22:40] <mime> Yes, consider what it would take.
  26. [10:22:43] <The_M> meteors
  27. [10:22:48] <The_M> nuclear war
  28. [10:22:51] <mime> Yeah, something like that
  29. [10:22:59] <The_M> overpopulation
  30. [10:23:03] <mime> Nuclear war, no
  31. [10:23:04] <The_M> a flu
  32. [10:23:07] <mime> Overpopulation, no
  33. [10:23:12] <mime> A flu, no
  34. [10:23:24] <deRuyte9> anti-conception
  35. [10:23:26] <mime> Maybe a meteorite.
  36. [10:23:28] <The_M> well usually some would survive
  37. [10:23:39] <The_M> mime, I just read an article about human teeth
  38. [10:23:53] <The_M> 2% of people are born without small incisors
  39. [10:24:29] <The_M> 20% never develop wisdom teeth
  40. [10:24:47] <The_M> and 25% of us have wisdom teeth that stay horizontal
  41. [10:24:59] <mime> Shocking?
  42. [10:25:11] <The_M> dare I say.....human evolution
  43. [10:25:32] <mime> I am not sure mere malfunction is evolutionary progress
  44. [10:25:34] <The_M> well, they did some research on old skeletons
  45. [10:25:44] <The_M> and our teeth are getting smaller
  46. [10:26:06] <The_M> over the past 1000 years, just a few procentpoints per generation
  47. [10:26:25] <The_M> its not malfunction mime
  48. [10:26:27] <mime> Well, there is a difference in teeth size compared to ancient humanoids, yes. But that 25% are born with such and so teeth, do not mean it has something do to with evolution in itself.
  49. [10:26:32] <mime> Its mere malfunction.
  50. [10:26:42] <The_M> hmmm
  51. [10:26:58] <mime> To be born without incisors is indeed a malfunction.
  52. [10:27:14] <The_M> it seems like our jaws are getting smaller and smaller....leaving less and less room for teeth to fully develop
  53. [10:27:42] <mime> The jaws are a little bit smaller than they used to be millions of years ago, yes.
  54. [10:27:57] <The_M> no no, not a little bit
  55. [10:28:04] <The_M> thats actually a big difference
  56. [10:28:35] <The_M> we have less powerful jaws, and that means we have a less rigid skull
  57. [10:28:38] <mime> I wouldnt say there is a huge difference in the jaw, from an evolutionary perspective. It looks the same way, it operates the same way.
  58. [10:28:42] <The_M> allowing for brain growth
  59. [10:28:50] <mime> Its just a little bit smaller. Its not like it do not chew anymore or anything like that.
  60. [10:28:52] <The_M> well, a jaw is a jaw yes
  61. [10:28:57] <mime> Nah
  62. [10:28:58] <The_M> hehe
  63. [10:29:04] <mime> A jaw isnt just a jaw, on the contrary.
  64. [10:29:11] <The_M> you dont chew as much as your ancestors
  65. [10:29:19] <mime> Dogs has jaws, but they are incapable of chewing, for example.
  66. [10:29:28] <The_M> what
  67. [10:29:52] <The_M> lol
  68. [10:30:00] <mime> Their jaws do not have the flexibility to chew food.
  69. [10:30:35] <mime> Its a strict rigid jaw which only moves in one direction, opposed to our jaws which moves in multiple directions.
  70. [10:31:00] <mime> The jaw hasnt undergone a very huge evolutionary change, except from becoming a little smaller.
  71. [10:31:02] <The_M> well, that probably has to do with what we eat
  72. [10:31:15] <mime> It has to do with bone construction, The_M
  73. [10:31:23] <The_M> well of course not, haha
  74. [10:31:41] <The_M> our food has changed, but we haven't become meateaters
  75. [10:31:48] <mime> But from the way you speak, a few examples of malfunction is suddenly evolutionary caused or something like that.
  76. [10:31:53] <The_M> no no
  77. [10:32:12] <The_M> there is evidence that our teeth and jaws are getting smaller
  78. [10:32:33] <mime> As I said, the jaw hasnt undergone a very huge evolutionary change, except from becoming a little smaller
  79. [10:32:38] <The_M> I did not just mention the 25% with horizontal wisdom teeth, I gave two other examples
  80. [10:33:13] <The_M> there is nothing malfunctionary about loosing teeth for which your jaw has no room
  81. [10:33:36] <mime> To have horizontal wisdom teeth is a malfunction, indeed
  82. [10:33:54] <mime> Same as being born without incisors, as you also mentioned.
  83. [10:34:02] <The_M> really?
  84. [10:34:12] <mime> Indeed. Such malfunction even require correction.
  85. [10:34:17] <The_M> and without wisdom teeth?
  86. [10:34:21] <The_M> really?
  87. [10:34:25] <mime> Indeed
  88. [10:34:28] <The_M> I dont think I have ever heard that
  89. [10:34:34] <The_M> people having extra teeth put in
  90. [10:35:09] <mime> Wisdom teeth do not have any useful purpose today, so from a practical point of view, such a malfunction isnt very severe, but it can cause other problems.
  91. [10:35:36] <The_M> well
  92. [10:35:54] <The_M> our teeth do not have any function, other than social
  93. [10:36:02] <mime> Hehe
  94. [10:36:12] <mime> Food is merely a social thing, huh?
  95. [10:36:22] <The_M> no
  96. [10:36:24] <The_M> teeth
  97. [10:36:38] <mime> Teeth function to break down food, The_M
  98. [10:36:44] <The_M> hmmm
  99. [10:36:54] <The_M> you could survive without
  100. [10:37:03] <The_M> boiling and cooking, and cutting with knifes
  101. [10:37:03] <mime> Sure, if you have adopted food
  102. [10:37:13] <The_M> yes
  103. [10:37:17] <The_M> thats the idea
  104. [10:37:28] <mime> Even when using a knife you are still in the need of digesting the food, and here teeth find its proper role.
  105. [10:37:29] <The_M> we no longer need teeth because we cook and boil our food
  106. [10:37:38] <The_M> dont think so mime
  107. [10:37:45] <mans0n> HALELEUHJAHHHHHHHHHHH
  108. [10:37:49] <mime> Well, its biological fact.
  109. [10:37:50] <The_M> you could get the same effect
  110. [10:37:53] <The_M> no
  111. [10:37:55] <mans0n> GOD WILL DELIVER
  112. [10:38:00] <The_M> hehe
  113. [10:38:09] <mime> That you could get the same effect by other means, do not mean teeth are not ment to break down food.
  114. [10:38:11] <mans0n> thank ya jesus
  115. [10:38:13] <mans0n> i feel good
  116. [10:38:21] <mans0n> god still works miracles
  117. [10:38:32] <The_M> sure mime
  118. [10:38:41] <The_M> that is their function in essence
  119. [10:39:00] <The_M> but the idea is that we no longer need that function, and that is why teeth are disappearing
  120. [10:39:10] <The_M> I wonder....
  121. [10:39:16] <mime> I have not heard of teeth disappearing due to any evolutionary reason.
  122. [10:39:20] <The_M> would caesarian births lead to bigger brains?
  123. [10:39:30] <The_M> mime, I just told you
  124. [10:39:38] <mime> Nah, you told us about malfunctions.
  125. [10:39:42] <The_M> 25% no longer develop wisdom teeth
  126. [10:39:51] <The_M> and 2% no longer have small incisors
  127. [10:39:53] <mime> 25% do indeed develop them, but wrongly
  128. [10:40:00] <The_M> 20%
  129. [10:40:08] <deRuyte9> you cannot switch off the gene for teeth growth
  130. [10:40:10] <The_M> wow, so you do pay attention!
  131. [10:40:11] <mime> Malfunctions and evolution is two different things.
  132. [10:40:15] <The_M> LOL
  133. [10:40:19] <The_M> oh dear mime
  134. [10:40:22] <deRuyte9> they"ll always be growing
  135. [10:40:36] <The_M> what utter nonsense deRuyter
  136. [10:40:42] <The_M> how do you know this to be true?
  137. [10:40:49] <deRuyte9> if you have the gene, you cannot lose the gene
  138. [10:40:55] <mime> You read too much popular science, The_M
  139. [10:41:20] <deRuyte9> its like having a big nose, your stuck with it, it wont get smaller
  140. [10:42:03] <The_M> ?
  141. [10:42:21] <The_M> what do you mean deRuyter?
  142. [10:42:49] <The_M> well mime, its the current scientific theory about why our teeth are getting smaller and even disappearing
  143. [10:43:01] <deRuyte9> you suggest that you can 'dial' (down) a gene for body-part growth
  144. [10:43:23] <The_M> haha deRuyter, of course, evolution works like that
  145. [10:43:30] <The_M> dial down, dial up
  146. [10:43:36] <The_M> anything
  147. [10:43:52] <The_M> there are people that develop two appendices....
  148. [10:43:56] <deRuyte9> you cannot have all body part sizes hard-coded in your gene - thats plainly impossible
  149. [10:44:11] <deRuyte9> a gene is discrete
  150. [10:44:14] <The_M> I think you are strawmanning again deRuyter
  151. [10:44:23] <The_M> I did not speak of any such thing
  152. [10:44:37] <deRuyte9> either you have the gene for a nose or you dont, there is very few in between
  153. [10:44:45] <The_M> ...?
  154. [10:44:49] <The_M> what about a very small nose
  155. [10:44:58] <deRuyte9> so gradual downsizing is impossible
  156. [10:45:11] <The_M> really
  157. [10:45:23] <The_M> you never noticed some people having small noses?
  158. [10:45:36] <deRuyte9> how would you code for every possible smaller nose size from normal to zero?
  159. [10:46:07] <The_M> haha
  160. [10:46:14] <The_M> thats a serious question?
  161. [10:46:19] <deRuyte9> exactly, obviously because body part size is NOT caused by genes and hence its not evolutionary
  162. [10:46:36] <The_M> LOL
  163. [10:46:50] <The_M> so genes do not control body part sizes????
  164. [10:46:54] <The_M> wow
  165. [10:47:08] <deRuyte9> no, just their occurrence or absence
  166. [10:47:20] <The_M> deRuyter...did you know that law enforcement is working on exactly this.....
  167. [10:47:24] <deRuyte9> the gradual size are caused by other things
  168. [10:47:55] <The_M> you can tell stuff about a suspect, just by looking at his dna
  169. [10:48:09] <deRuyte9> its impossible to code every conceivable body part size in a finite gene
  170. [10:48:22] <The_M> really?
  171. [10:48:30] <deRuyte9> how would you do that?
  172. [10:48:38] <deRuyte9> you cant and therefore it doesnt happen
  173. [10:48:42] <The_M> LOL
  174. [10:48:44] <The_M> no
  175. [10:48:54] <The_M> I propose another solution to this conundrum
  176. [10:49:00] <The_M> you dont understand genes
  177. [10:49:08] <The_M> could that be possible?
  178. [10:49:29] <deRuyte9> how many possible nose sizes are there?
  179. [10:49:34] <deRuyte9> give me a number
  180. [10:49:37] <The_M> wow
  181. [10:49:46] <deRuyte9> 2?
  182. [10:49:46] <mans0n> deRuyte9: 1947
  183. [10:49:47] <The_M> almost infinite I would say
  184. [10:49:56] <The_M> elephants have huge noses
  185. [10:49:57] <mans0n> The_M: wrong
  186. [10:50:01] <The_M> and my nose is dainty
  187. [10:50:02] <mans0n> i just counted
  188. [10:50:05] <mans0n> its 1947.
  189. [10:50:38] <The_M> but ok deRuyter, lets say 200.000
  190. [10:50:50] <deRuyte9> so you need 2^^10 (ca. 1947) genes just for nose size
  191. [10:50:50] <mans0n> i will allow it
  192. [10:51:01] <The_M> no
  193. [10:51:02] <deRuyte9> thats preposterous and therefore impossible
  194. [10:51:11] <deRuyte9> that would be just for the nose
  195. [10:51:12] <The_M> and thats not how genes work haha
  196. [10:51:14] <The_M> yeah
  197. [10:51:23] <The_M> want me to tell you how it works?
  198. [10:51:30] <deRuyte9> men only has so many genes (10.000?)
  199. [10:51:37] <The_M> want me to tell you how it works?
  200. [10:51:51] <deRuyte9> these 10.000 genes cant possibly code for all possible body part size
  201. [10:52:08] <The_M> you have gene for growing a nose, and a gene for stopping a nose to grow, and one that measures time.....
  202. [10:52:18] <The_M> :-)
  203. [10:52:31] <The_M> god
  204. [10:52:47] <The_M> you dont know the first thing about genes, and you just blabber on
  205. [10:52:58] <The_M> dunning-f ing-kruger
  206. [10:53:18] <The_M> so, just a few genes regulate nose size deRuyter
  207. [10:53:22] <The_M> next question
  208. [10:53:48] <deRuyte9> you are guessing with your 'time-measuring genes'
  209. [10:53:54] <The_M> am I
  210. [10:54:01] <The_M> how would you know
  211. [10:54:10] Viljami (~androirc@52D9E6B5.cm-11-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl) left IRC (Read error: EOF from client)
  212. [10:54:10] <The_M> you've never even opened a book on genes
  213. [10:54:13] <The_M> come on
  214. [10:55:34] <The_M> what they are researching in the netherlands deRuyter is the link between genes and faces
  215. [10:55:51] <The_M> it should yield a new technique for identifying suspects
  216. [10:56:24] <mime> Someone is selling the King James Bible which belonged to the Apostle Paul.
  217. [10:56:28] <The_M> imagine the police just finding dna, with this new technique they could make a picture of his face
  218. [10:56:31] <deRuyte9> so why does the body not change the size of the nose after someone had plastic surgery?
  219. [10:56:53] <deRuyte9> it should if your fantasy 'time-measuring gene' existed
  220. [10:56:56] <The_M> good question!
  221. [10:57:03] <The_M> very good question!
  222. [10:57:25] <The_M> what you should understand is that dna and the human body are just machines
  223. [10:57:48] <The_M> the body has no 'self image' of what it should look
  224. [10:58:12] <The_M> there is no conscious effort checking the actual size of your nose
  225. [10:58:17] <mime> Yes, it has. It even recognize others of the same image, to very specific degrees.
  226. [10:58:26] <The_M> LOL
  227. [10:58:36] <mime> Even knowing the physical and mental difference between parents, for example
  228. [10:58:43] <The_M> LOL
  229. [10:58:50] guerro (gur@cpe-70-113-148-212.tx.res.rr.com) joined the channel
  230. [10:58:52] <The_M> so your body knows these things consciously????
  231. [10:58:54] <The_M> come on
  232. [10:59:00] <The_M> no
  233. [10:59:04] <mime> That is correct, you are a human.
  234. [10:59:06] <The_M> your MIND does yes
  235. [10:59:15] <mime> its a specific type of animal.
  236. [10:59:22] <The_M> your MIND understands your nose is now smaller after surgery
  237. [10:59:23] <mime> The mind is something supernatural?
  238. [10:59:37] <mime> Nah, its physically smaller after such an operation
  239. [10:59:40] <The_M> well...its non physical mime
  240. [10:59:59] <The_M> you cant weigh of a kilo of mind
  241. [11:00:07] <mime> The brain is very physical, The_M
  242. [11:00:11] <The_M> you can weigh a kilo of brains
  243. [11:00:15] <The_M> come on, dont play games
  244. [11:00:29] <mime> Mental activity is neurological activity as well, which is quite physical.
  245. [11:01:02] <The_M> hehe
  246. [11:01:06] <The_M> nice try
  247. [11:01:23] <The_M> mental ACTIVITY
  248. [11:01:25] <mime> You deny that neurological activity is physical?
  249. [11:01:32] <mime> Yes?
  250. [11:01:42] <The_M> no, stop strawmanning
  251. [11:01:45] <mime> What?
  252. [11:01:50] <The_M> stop changing words around
  253. [11:02:02] <The_M> the mind and mental activity are two separate things
  254. [11:02:06] <The_M> just like brains
  255. [11:02:13] <The_M> and chemical activity
  256. [11:02:18] <The_M> the mind
  257. [11:02:24] <mime> No, mental activity is what the brain does when it operates.
  258. [11:02:31] <The_M> exactly
  259. [11:03:02] <The_M> so anyhoo
  260. [11:03:04] <The_M> noses
  261. [11:03:38] <The_M> once the genes for nose growth shut the process down, nothing happens when you cut off a piece of your nose
  262. [11:03:48] <The_M> the genes remain dormant
  263. [11:03:55] <The_M> in some species they dont
  264. [11:04:05] <mime> If you cut of your nose, you will probably bleed to death.
  265. [11:04:16] <mime> There is a huge risk of it, at least.
  266. [11:04:23] <The_M> lizards and amphibians do have a process that regrows limbs lost
  267. [11:04:50] <The_M> and to be clear deRuyter, this process is also understood, and understood to be regulated with genes
  268. [11:04:55] <The_M> its not magic
  269. [11:04:58] <The_M> :-)
  270. [11:05:22] <The_M> LOL
  271. [11:05:30] <mime> <The_M> there is no conscious effort checking the actual size of your nose
  272. [11:05:33] <The_M> noses are not regulated by genes!!!
  273. [11:05:39] <The_M> exactly mime
  274. [11:05:58] <mime> Actually humans makes conscious effort to familiarize with others.
  275. [11:06:07] <The_M> yes
  276. [11:06:14] <mime> OK.
  277. [11:06:21] <The_M> again
  278. [11:06:26] <The_M> stop strawmanning
  279. [11:06:38] <The_M> we are talking genes, you are talking human minds
  280. [11:06:44] <mime> You are the one who arent very precise, The_M
  281. [11:06:53] <The_M> I was very precise
  282. [11:06:58] <mime> You are saying to different things, already.
  283. [11:07:06] <The_M> thats exactly why I used the phrase 'conscious effort'
  284. [11:07:10] <The_M> no no
  285. [11:07:24] <mime> First you say: <The_M> there is no conscious effort checking the actual size of your nose. Then you say: <mime> Actually humans makes conscious effort to familiarize with others. <The_M> yes
  286. [11:07:28] <The_M> thats exactly why I used the phrase 'conscious effort'
  287. [11:07:39] <The_M> yup
  288. [11:07:44] <mime> But you are already in a massive contradiction.
  289. [11:07:45] <The_M> and now stop playing games
  290. [11:07:52] <The_M> not interested in bs mime
  291. [11:07:56] <The_M> you know this
  292. [11:08:06] <The_M> you dont even get three strikes on this one
  293. [11:08:36] <The_M> so deRuyter, any more gene-related mystery I can clear up for you?
  294. [11:08:42] <mime> First you are saying humans do not make conscious efforts in familiarizing with others, which include an intricate social behavior adaption such as interpreting mimics, and knowing the difference between two one-egged twins, and then you say they do.
  295. [11:08:52] <The_M> or are you reading a book on human genetics???
  296. [11:09:11] <mime> You are not very precise in neither statements or language here.
  297. [11:09:39] <The_M> that should be either, not neither, right....IK....
  298. [11:11:21] <mime> It is very important to understand the difference between popular science, and science. The latter do not use language the same way the former do.
  299. [11:11:56] <The_M> mime, that research is still being done, in the real world
  300. [11:12:12] <The_M> enabling to put a face to a dna sample
  301. [11:12:23] <mime> Thus one very often end up in contradictory and rather dumb conclusions when going by the former, which should be apparent for most.
  302. [11:12:44] <mime> Like "the body do know have a self-image" and such.
  303. [11:13:14] <The_M> well we were talking in the context of plastic surgery mime
  304. [11:13:18] <mime> The body do indeed recognize itself, even maintain itself and heal itself when necessary and possible.
  305. [11:13:37] <The_M> yeah, and we understand the mechanism
  306. [11:13:47] <mime> OK.
  307. [11:13:57] <The_M> hehe
  308. [11:14:00] <The_M> LOL
  309. [11:14:08] <mime> Weird that one would say the opposite :-)
  310. [11:14:18] <The_M> one of the rare moments in life, where the word 'cancer' can make me smile
  311. [11:14:29] <The_M> what about cancer mime
  312. [11:14:33] <The_M> what is cancer?
  313. [11:14:39] <mime> A gene mutation
  314. [11:14:43] <The_M> a momentary lap in the body's self image?
  315. [11:14:44] <The_M> ah
  316. [11:14:46] <The_M> genes
  317. [11:14:47] <The_M> ok
  318. [11:14:54] <The_M> lapse
  319. [11:15:05] <mime> That the body get sick and injured, do not make it any less aware of itself.
  320. [11:15:05] <The_M> btw, it might well be
  321. [11:15:07] <The_M> ...
  322. [11:15:20] <The_M> hehe
  323. [11:15:49] <mime> Indeed its very familiar with itself, and will start to attack cancer cells. The problem is that these trick the body to attack itself.
  324. [11:16:39] <The_M> :-)
  325. [11:16:45] <The_M> keep trying mime
  326. [11:16:55] <mime> The_M No need to be rude.
  327. [11:17:38] <mime> Just because you are mistaken when saying the body has no self-knowledge of itself, is no reason to reject fact.
  328. [11:18:04] <mime> Its very dangerous if the body isnt aware of itself, such as not being able to feel pain.
  329. [11:18:16] <The_M> LOL
  330. [11:18:41] <mime> You could burn yourself on a stove for example, in such cases. Or take a swim in very cold water.
  331. [11:18:47] <The_M> we were talking in the context of plastic surgery
  332. [11:19:11] <mime> You wouldnt notice that the body starts shutting down in order to protect itself, and keep vital organs and systems within a viable temperature.
  333. [11:20:09] <mime> Yeah, wouldnt make a difference of course, as one recognize those of the same and different traits as your specie and would be able to separate between one-egged twins and such.
  334. [11:20:17] <mime> We love freaks, The_M
  335. [11:21:05] <The_M> well I do yes, very interesting
  336. [11:21:34] <mime> That is because the body is greater than a mere thought-scheme of popular science mixed with personal sentiment.
  337. [11:22:12] <The_M> ah
  338. [11:30:17] <IrishKing> +
  339. [11:30:50] <IrishKing> Good morming Team!!
  340. [11:31:09] <The_M> good morning IK
  341. [11:33:57] <IrishKing> Greetings my favorite Dutch Atheist!
  342. [11:34:35] ^Pilgrim^ (~Pilgrim@c122-106-94-128.randw3.nsw.optusnet.com.au) left IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
  343. [11:35:04] Holston (~Holston@76-193-126-145.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net) joined the channel
  344. [11:35:09] <The_M> hehe
  345. [11:36:44] <mime> IrishKing kicked mime from the channel (Shouldn't you be sucking Mouser's short stubby d*?)
  346. [11:36:51] <mime> I allowed myself to censor that.
  347. [11:37:47] <mime> The lack of meat on Fridays can make some people a little cranky.
  348. [11:40:52] KRISTINA1983 (~MADE-IN83@vlan-132-6-32.comnet.bg) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  349. [11:42:51] wook (~quassel@195.174.180.237) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  350. [11:43:26] wook (~quassel@173.239.199.76) joined the channel
  351. [11:47:35] Holston (~Holston@76-193-126-145.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net) left IRC (EOF from client)
  352. [11:47:47] guerro (gur@cpe-70-113-148-212.tx.res.rr.com) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  353. [11:47:47] Holston (~Holston@76-193-126-145.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net) joined the channel
  354. [11:50:39] <mime> http://www.statoil.com/en/news/first-electricity-delivered-from-dudgeon.html
  355. [11:51:15] wook (~quassel@173.239.199.76) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  356. [11:51:20] X sets mode +l 23
  357. [11:51:23] <mime> The Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm site is located 32 km offshore Norfolk, UK and, and is 20 km east of the Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm, where Statoil currently holds a 40% share. The Dudgeon Offshore Wind farm consists of 67 six-megawatt wind turbine generators with a total installed capacity of 402 MW producing 1.73 TWh/year - equivalent to the consumption of more than 400,000 UK households.
  358. [11:52:13] <mime> The installation of the remaining 66 wind turbine generators is expected to be completed by Q4/2017, when the wind farm will be fully operational.
  359. [11:52:15] pete- sets mode +b *!*oskar@104.243.241.*
  360. [11:52:15] <@pete-> mime, You've been devoiced 55 minutes for insultingt comments and your banned by TRK!
  361. [11:52:40] <TRK> also now i am going to ban you foir 30 days
  362. [11:52:44] wook (~quassel@104.237.91.27) joined the channel
  363. [11:53:28] <TRK> you have been nwarned many time for ur comments
  364. [11:53:40] <The_M> I've missed someting
  365. [11:55:32] pete- kicked mime from the channel (insulting comments towards channel users)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!