API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-27 1545 +dawnatilla

Lesta
Feb 26th, 2016
71
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.63 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-27 1545 +dawnatilla
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHAdA0chvJk&lc=z13jhj4z5ym1ur52223izvh4ykeptlzuf.1456552130240125
  3. https://pastebin.com/EHsqRcKL
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +dawnatilla __ Read this reply and respond to each point or explain why I shouldn't ban you for causing trouble. Since you want to bring up "Peekay" here (this is not the appropriate place) then respond to the following. *Explain the jumping view count I pointed out.* "Peekay's" video went from "333 views" to "351 views". *Busted.* What is the explanation? Easy. The reason is because "Peekay" had two tabs open but wanted to make a song and dance out of the number "333". *THAT'S ALL THIS WAS ABOUT.* "Peekay" KNOWS that a portion of his audience are into "numbers" (like "33" and "666") and he is taking advantage of them. Are you okay with that?
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. *The fact "Peekay" would focus and fixate on the number "333" when HE KNEW his video had a higher view count shows he is inclined to misrepresent insignificant and otherwise TRIVIAL DETAILS. If he is prepared to do that then lying about major details won't be a problem.*
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. *SUPPORTING EXAMPLE:* Why does "Peekay" insist the alleged "Virginia shooting" was done in two takes? *Busted.* That video is disinformation and at the time of writing this reply to you has been viewed ~750,000 times. That is harmful to everyone who is aware of fabricated events but "Peekay" does not give a f_kc.
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. *ANOTHER SUPPORTING EXAMPLE:* Why does "Peekay" - who everyone knows has made a name for himself covering the alleged "Boston Marathon Bombing" - suggest that "Jeff Bauman" is also "Nicholas Vogt"? *Busted.* They are not the same person. Not even close. Yet how can it be the guy who has covered "Boston" the most would CONTINUE to suggest it?
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. You are attacking me *reflexively* and EMOTIONALLY because if you had evaluated ALL of the evidence I had presented you would instead be thanking me. *"Peekay" focused on the parts that I got wrong because THAT'S WHAT GUILTY PEOPLE DO.* The scrolling glitch was satisfactorily reproduced and ruled out *and was never crucial to the central claim* against "Peekay".
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. The reason I spent so much time on the "scrolling glitch" was because "Peekay" kept claiming he didn't know what I was referring to. Now it is obvious why he did that. He wanted me to focus on it so he could then post his response videos poking that detail to pieces. That shows how devious "Peekay" is. He knew that the core detail was the jumping view count. Did you notice that he NEVER ADDRESSED THAT? I am posting a follow-up video that spells all of these things out. You have been manipulated by him.
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. I have PROVEN that "Peekay" misrepresents when there is no need to (there is NEVER a need to misrepresent ANYTHING). Good and honest people do not EVER behave in that way. Yet we have caught "Peekay" doing just that. You somehow expect me to produce a miracle in proving that "Peekay" is a liar but it isn't that simple. All I have to work with are the videos HE has posted (and curiously enough "Peekay" has since REMOVED the video I pointed out that started all of this). It isn't easy. You have to take what scraps you can get and present it and HOPE that people can figure out the rest for themselves.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. Rather than thank me for pointing out what appears to be a nasty cancerous mole on your skin (that to you looks innocuous) you are lashing out at me. I get it - you believe "Peekay" is an honest guy and a straight shooter. You think "Peekay" is "all about the truth" (despite my supporting examples above). I get it - you find him charming. You WANT to like him. That's understandable. That's how he presents himself. *You should know that we are all vulnerable to those we find charming and endearing.*
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. *Address the specific points I have raised or go away.* I have received more than enough hate for pointing out what is right in front of you and I don't need any more of it from you. I have done you a favour - at risk to my own reputation - it is not my fault you are too stupid to realise it.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. __________________________________________
  76. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  77. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  78.  
  79. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  80. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  81.  
  82. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  83. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  84.  
  85. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  86. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!