JaysonSunshine

ragle is terrible at debate

Aug 19th, 2017
217
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.60 KB | None | 0 0
  1. +inkless
  2. Meanwhile, the fact that Google fires people for making reasonable suggestions for how they could be a more inclusive employer is barely considered newsworthy. I'll just wait patiently to learn the outcome of that lawsuit.
  3. Stopped ignoring ragle!*@*
  4. ⓘ Debates set mode -b *!*darkies@*.ks.ok.cox.net
  5. ← guy_41 has left
  6. +GeneralAwareness
  7. I still had ragle on ignore since last week.
  8. ragle: I took you off ignore.
  9. inkless: I read a fair bit about the Google memo.
  10. I have recently read Yuval Harari's Homo Deus in which he talks extensively about humanism as a religion.
  11. → Herbie`6 has joined
  12. ⓘ ChanServ set mode +b *!*darkies@*.ks.ok.cox.net
  13. ← Herbie`6 was kicked by ChanServ (User has been banned from the channel)
  14. +inkless
  15. and I can't even find details of who organized this rally in Boston and what their platform/principles are
  16. +GeneralAwareness
  17. Google's response was a clear religious response.
  18. James Damore wrote his memo in the spirit of the scientific project.
  19. Google's response was a reaffirmation of their core values, that is, a statement of faith.
  20. +inkless
  21. Google has near-unilateral power to push websites into the deep web, and there is no reason to believe they are more responsible with that power than with their power to arbitrarily terminate employees
  22. +GeneralAwareness
  23. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450387/james-damore-google-memo-manufactured-diversity-controv...
  24. → Hedrin has joined
  25. → Hedrin_ has joined
  26. ⓘ Raven`X set mode +v Hedrin
  27. ⓘ Mabus set mode +v Hedrin
  28. ⓘ Raven`X set mode +v Hedrin_
  29. +GeneralAwareness
  30. inkless: I think their firing should give genuine concern to their ability to operate fair algorithms.
  31. ⓘ Hedrin is now known as Hedrin__
  32. +GeneralAwareness
  33. It's already been shown, repeatedly, that it's actually quite hard to make neutral algorithms in the space of machine learning.
  34. +Hedrin_
  35. Hello
  36. +ragle
  37. http://heavy.com/news/2017/08/john-medlar-boston-free-speech-rally-coalition-organizer/
  38. ⓘ Hedrin_ is now known as Hedrin
  39. +inkless
  40. Personally I hate searching for anything using any search engine
  41. +ragle
  42. Medlar claims he won't provide a platform for racists but invited Gavin McInnes and Augustus Invictus anyway (before they dropped out of the lineup)
  43. +inkless
  44. I've gotten good at "google-fu" but I still prefer to just know the addresses of good sites, which I keep in a text file
  45. You can only use search engines to look for information that you know you don't know
  46. +GeneralAwareness
  47. I don't know that Gavin is a racist.
  48. +inkless
  49. or that you know you know and you want a source to give to others
  50. +GeneralAwareness
  51. Not that it's that important.
  52. What one guy does or says.
  53. +ragle
  54. as for the Google guy, he wasn't fired for wanting a "more inclusive" workplace...he was fired for being a sexist dirtbag and saying sexist dirtbaggy things
  55. +inkless
  56. but to learn what you don't even know that you don't know, you have to interact with other people
  57. ragle: did you actually read the memo?
  58. +GeneralAwareness
  59. ragle: That sounds like a non-scientific response.
  60. 1 - You're making ad hominem statements which are unprofessional.
  61. +Hedrin
  62. I had a weird incident happen this morning. People are getting nuttier and nuttier all the time.
  63. +GeneralAwareness
  64. 2 - You're imputing motive which the history of philosophy tells us is notoriously fraught with risk.
  65. +ragle
  66. inkless, yes
  67. +GeneralAwareness
  68. ragle: I will ignore you on your next fallacy.
  69. ragle: Please provide what you think is the best citation from Damore's memo that supports your thesis.
  70. +inkless
  71. ragle: cool, then can you quote something from it that a reasonable person would consider to be "sexist dirtbaggy things"?
  72. +GeneralAwareness
  73. (He's not going to)
  74. (He's going to give us further personal narrative that tells us the memo was real bad)
  75. +ragle
  76. inkless, you mean like the part where he claims that biological differences promote gender gaps at Google and the tech industry?
  77. +Hedrin
  78. fuck the Google guy.
  79. +GeneralAwareness
  80. (Perhaps followed up with veiled criticisms of our character and/or worldview)
  81. I don't think he precisely made that claim.
  82. He made claims very close to that, though.
  83. His primary claim follows:
  84. +inkless
  85. ragle: actual words rather than your paraphrasing would be awesome
  86. +GeneralAwareness
  87. 1 - We observe unequal representation of men and women in tech and tech leadership.
  88. +Hedrin
  89. I am not sure why so many think Google doesn't have the right to fire him for any reason.
  90. +GeneralAwareness
  91. 2 - Not all of that delta is explained through discriminatory hiring practices.
  92. 3 - A non-zero amount of that delta may be do to biological differences in men and women.
  93. +ragle
  94. inkless, i will see if i can find it again since i said i had read it, not memorized it....the point, however, is that Google and many many many others did consider it sexist and dirtbaggy...that's why he was fired
  95. → Sardaukar has joined
  96. ⓘ Raven`X set mode +v Sardaukar
  97. ⓘ Mabus set mode +v Sardaukar
  98. +GeneralAwareness
  99. 4 - The best way to resolve those biological differences is constructing a workplace that is congruent with the differential preferences of men and women.
  100. +Hedrin
  101. Go boycott Google - use hotbot or altavista or Askjeeves
  102. +GeneralAwareness
  103. 5 - It's important to avoid discriminatory and/or illegal responses to try and fix that delta.
  104. ⓘ Debates set mode +l 74
  105. +GeneralAwareness
  106. 6 - It appears Google may believe it is participating in some illegal responses to address that delta.
  107. inkless: He's going to see if he can find it again.
  108. It can be really hard to re-find a document in the digital era with search engines.
  109. He knows a guy, though, he may know where he left the document.
  110. He didn't memorize it, after all.
  111. It's not like you can ctrl-f through a document in the digital age.
  112. +inkless
  113. ragle: I don't really care what other people think of something, unless I can read it and see that it's sexist I will assume the other people are just wrong or lying
  114. +GeneralAwareness
  115. And your expectation of him memorizing the entire document seems a little unfair.
  116. inkless: Did you know what he did after that?
  117. ← moonpie has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
  118. +GeneralAwareness
  119. He reiterated his thesis.
  120. So, here's what he's done so far.
  121. 1 - Make very powerful thesis.
  122. +ragle
  123. inkless, that assumption and about $3 will get you a cup of coffee at your local gender inclusive Starbucks
  124. +Hedrin
  125. Sexists and racists are similar in the fact that when they get called out on it - they act like they are the victim and you're the asshole.
  126. +GeneralAwareness
  127. 2 - When challenged to defend thesis, state he's not sure if he can do it, and then repeat thesis.
  128. This is what we're working with.
  129. Ignoring ragle!*@*
  130. +GeneralAwareness
  131. ragle: You made another fallacy.
  132. This resulted in my ignoring you.
  133. +inkless
  134. and one way people lie is by inventing their own definiton of a word, and then deliberately equivocating between that definition and the dictionary definition whcih reports what the vast majority of people understand the word to mean
  135. +Hedrin
  136. I don't understand why if you're a sexist or a racist - you don't take a little pride in yourself and accept the consequences.
  137. +GeneralAwareness
  138. Further, I will add this conversation to a record of chatter's behavior.
  139. And I will substantially downgrade my estimate of your intelligence.
  140. +inkless
  141. ragle: but you haven't quoted the relevant section yt
  142. which in turn makes me wonder if you read it
  143. +GeneralAwareness
  144. inkless: What do you think are the odds he's ever going to cite the document?
  145. I'll go with 3%.
  146. +inkless
  147. GeneralAwareness: should we have a novelty bet on it?
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment