OhGodAPet

Untitled

Dec 27th, 2019
574
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.58 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Wolf9466Today at 4:46 PM
  2. We can trade off, ya see!
  3. Less devices of higher quality, or...
  4. ... more devices of lower quality!
  5.  
  6. GigabytedToday at 4:47 PM
  7. even if you had lets say 90% of the hashrate where you mine 200k coins a day, to earn back that 200k$ it would take a year :slight_smile:
  8.  
  9. Wolf9466Today at 4:47 PM
  10. I have REAL estimates for this also from a REAL design company which does custom ASIC shit... sec.
  11.  
  12. GigabytedToday at 4:47 PM
  13. kinda cool thou to know that is an option
  14. will keep my eye open for other projects alike
  15.  
  16. Wolf9466Today at 4:47 PM
  17. Okay, for their shitty design
  18.  
  19. GigabytedToday at 4:47 PM
  20. lets do one for cruz!
  21.  
  22. Wolf9466Today at 4:47 PM
  23. They were estimating something like...
  24.  
  25. GigabytedToday at 4:47 PM
  26. just kidding :slight_smile:
  27.  
  28. Wolf9466Today at 4:48 PM
  29. For a voltage of 0.9V, their power dissipation (per IC) would be 3.19mW, with a delay of 3.272ns, meaning a max clock speed of 305.6Mhz.
  30. This translates to 305.6MH/s per chip.
  31.  
  32. GigabytedToday at 4:48 PM
  33. You saw that ive tagged you in cruz channel the other day?
  34.  
  35. Wolf9466Today at 4:48 PM
  36. Nope. I dun go there, but I can! In a minute, though...
  37. So...
  38. They also did the calcs for other voltages.
  39.  
  40. GigabytedToday at 4:49 PM
  41. Where that dude was telling me how superior cruz was because it had its protocol in json :slight_smile:
  42. while btc is all bytes
  43.  
  44. Wolf9466Today at 4:49 PM
  45. 0.8V - 2.46mW / chip, 4.250ns, for 235.3Mhz
  46. So, 235.3MH/s per chip...
  47. However, this was their original proposal for a design
  48. which was kinda shit.
  49. I just about halved their delay, while keeping their throughput of one hash per clock cycle...
  50. So, we'd be looking at over 500MH/s per chip (very lowball estimate) with a 0.9V input.
  51.  
  52. GigabytedToday at 4:50 PM
  53. damn
  54.  
  55. Wolf9466Today at 4:50 PM
  56. Realistically - likely over 600MH/s.
  57. So, we put multiples on a PCB...
  58.  
  59. GigabytedToday at 4:50 PM
  60. a BCU is doing about 9ghs
  61.  
  62. Wolf9466Today at 4:51 PM
  63. ... how many TH/s you want? x3
  64.  
  65. GigabytedToday at 4:51 PM
  66. :slight_smile:
  67.  
  68. Wolf9466Today at 4:51 PM
  69. We need fifteen to match it.
  70.  
  71. GigabytedToday at 4:51 PM
  72. pocket changes :slight_smile:
  73.  
  74. Wolf9466Today at 4:51 PM
  75. How much power does the BCU use for 9GH/s?
  76.  
  77. GigabytedToday at 4:51 PM
  78. about 300w i believe
  79.  
  80. Wolf9466Today at 4:52 PM
  81. We'd use about...
  82. 0.5317% of the power that the BCU does.
  83. For the exact same hashrate.
  84.  
  85. GigabytedToday at 4:53 PM
  86. lol
  87. so yeah these dude are doing money with this hashrate then
  88.  
  89. Wolf9466Today at 4:54 PM
  90. 3.19mW (or 0.00319W) times 15 is 0.04785W.
  91.  
  92. GigabytedToday at 4:54 PM
  93. yeah sounds a bit better huh! lol
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment