Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [21:39:01] lanceobanana: Avoiding the argument is a fallacy
- [21:39:22] A ☺: No it isn't
- [21:39:26] lanceobanana: Yes it is
- [21:39:29] A ☺: Prove it.
- [21:40:44] lanceobanana: Red herring is an English-language idiom that commonly refers to a logical fallacy that misleads or detracts from the actual issue.
- [21:40:46] lanceobanana: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
- [21:41:38] A ☺: How is my asking a question a red herring?
- [21:41:59] lanceobanana: [21:36] A ☺:
- <<< who is this grativationallensing guy?
- [21:42:06] lanceobanana: What does this have to do with our axiom talk
- [21:42:31] A ☺: Who said it has anything to do with our axiom talk?
- [21:43:01] lanceobanana: Nobody must say it, you dont talk about something else amid an argument
- [21:43:13] A ☺: Why not?
- [21:43:26] lanceobanana: I've already explained why
- [21:43:29] lanceobanana: this is wilfull ignorance
- [21:43:46] A ☺: No you haven't
- [21:43:54] lanceobanana: Yes I did, wilfull ignorance
- [21:43:59] A ☺: Nope
- [21:44:03] A ☺: It's not a red herring
- [21:44:07] lanceobanana: wilfull ignorance
- [21:44:07] A ☺: Prove that it's a red herring
- [21:44:12] lanceobanana: I've already did that
- [21:44:14] lanceobanana: wilfull ignorance
- [21:44:16] A ☺: No you didn't
- [21:44:20] lanceobanana: Yes I did
- [21:44:24] A ☺: No you didn't
- [21:44:38] A ☺: A red herring is not "anything that is not relevant to the argument"
- [21:44:42] A ☺: It's something that misleads the reader
- [21:44:47] lanceobanana: Which it did
- [21:44:50] A ☺: No it didn't
- [21:44:54] lanceobanana: Yes it did
- [21:44:57] A ☺: No.
- [21:45:52] lanceobanana: Yes
- [21:46:08] A ☺: No
- [21:46:14] lanceobanana: Yes
- [21:46:18] A ☺: Prove it.
- [21:46:27] lanceobanana: Already did, wilfull ignorance
- [21:46:33] A ☺: No u didn't
- [21:46:37] lanceobanana: Yes I did
- [21:46:40] A ☺: No.
- [21:46:42] lanceobanana: Yes
- [21:46:45] A ☺: No
- [21:46:46] lanceobanana: yes
- [21:46:48] A ☺: Prove it
- [21:46:51] lanceobanana: Already did
- [21:46:57] A ☺: Not this one
- [21:47:06] lanceobanana: I've proven this already
- [21:47:17] lanceobanana: wilfull ignorance
- [21:47:23] A ☺: This is proving that you gave a proof
- [21:47:29] A ☺: Prove that you gave a proof
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment