API tools faq
paste
Lesta

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-24 0725 +geochaben

Lesta
Jun 23rd, 2016
54
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.69 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-24 0725 +geochaben
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2N6KwFPEn0&lc=z12bgpuwzyu5xvyol04cj1tqgk2eh3pje3k
  3. https://pastebin.com/DExmRehM
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +geochaben __ ::deep sigh:: By very nature of being allegedly filmed in "space" *all* purported "ISS" videos are a kind of "proof of being in space". If they weren't then why would you cite the "Sunita Williams" tour? You are trying to be more clever than you are. A music video is proof of music - not anything else. If a *music* video were just 5 minutes of silence - would it be a "music" video? No. If a "NASA" video isn't of the "ISS" then would it be a "living in space" video? Of course not.
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. It's hard to know if you're just trolling. You have admitted that 10 minutes of qualifying footage would be sufficient proof. So what's your problem? No one - least of all me - is suggesting that parabolic flights can last up to 9 minutes and 59 seconds. If there's a clean 10 minute video without indications of tricks then the claim is necessarily proven. Such footage would make it impossible to reasonably and rationally doubt the "ISS" (yet you haven't wondered why it doesn't exist).
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. Ten minutes is not unreasonable and it would silence all honest and rational "conspiracy theorists". So I'll repeat the condition for qualifying footage one more time: 10 minutes of genuine sustained micro/zero gravity that upon scrutiny *remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans*.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. It's not that such footage doesn't exist - *there should be an abundance of it*. Of 1,000 alleged "ISS" videos that run longer than 10 minutes from a fixed camera angle we should reasonably expect dozens to qualify.
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. It's also not that such footage couldn't exist - for there are many alleged "ISS" interviews from a single fixed camera that purport to run longer than 10 minutes - they just contain potential editing points and therefore fail to stand up to scrutiny. And it must stand up to scrutiny. Simply to say "looks convincing to me" is not enough. Many a child will find magic tricks to be convincing - is that proof of magic?
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. You keep citing the "boredom" factor. ::sigh:: do you really think that's a concern? If it were - why would "NASA" post huge 7 to 12 hour "EVAs" where - compared to a 45 minute "ISS tour" or a mere 15 minute "ISS interview" is *extremely* "boring"? Do you imagine the next generation of potential "astronauts" would be "bored" if they accidentally watched a mere 10 continuous minutes free from potential editing points by way of glitches, cuts, edits and pans etcetera?
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. If I told you I can hold my breath underwater for 17 minutes and showed you a video of my claim but the video contained periodic hard cuts would you accept it as proof I held my breath underwater for 17 minutes?! If someone asks: Why all the cuts? Would the reply "otherwise it would be boring!" be satisfying? Would you accept it as sufficient proof of the claim?!
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. You haven't actually examined this issue have you?
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70. You keep bringing up the corridor aspect and somehow think it proves something. Since you keep mentioning it and could be referring to anything from that worthless video *tell me the specific start and end time periods and I'll take a look* at what you're all excited about.
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78. Just don't throw another video at me when I point out what's wrong with it. Do you realise what you're doing? You have never scrutinised the "ISS" footage because your starting assumption is that it's all "real". If you examined this issue properly then you would realise there is something profoundly disturbing going on. You would then realise what I'm going on about and that I'm not some whacky "conspiracy theorist".
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86. I am not asserting there is no real and manned "ISS" - there may well be one - *rather, I'm pointing out that what we need to see to justify that belief is not present*. There is a huge difference and it has profound implications for the population - which includes you. But you're a long way from understanding that point. Though if you can carry on then maybe you'll get there.
  87.  
  88.  
  89. __________________________________________
  90. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  91. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  92.  
  93. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  94. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  95.  
  96. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  97. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  98.  
  99. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  100. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!