Kim Dot Com Seth Rich 8.8.17

Question to Kim Dotcom: Tell us the truth about Seth Rich by Internet Party August 8 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuARd-q3-u0

 Transcript
0:07
some people are asking you to talk about
0:10
Seath rich tell us the truth yeah I
0:15
would like to do that here's the issue
0:18
and you know people need to understand
0:20
why I need to be very careful about this
0:24
I have a large legal team both in New
0:27
Zealand in the United States I have
0:29
lawyers in Hong Kong and elsewhere what
0:32
is important here is that I do secure an
0:40
understanding with the US government
0:43
that I cannot be charged with anything
0:46
that has to do with the with the leaking
0:51
of emails from the from the DNC and
0:55
campaign people within the DNC to
0:58
WikiLeaks I need to secure based on my
1:03
legal advice I need to secure an
1:06
agreement that gives me immunity in
1:10
exchange for the evidence that I can
1:13
provide everything that I've said is
1:14
true the statement that I've made on my
1:17
website about seth rich is true and i
1:21
just have to go through the legal
1:24
process because i'm already in enough
1:26
trouble and i don't want to give them
1:29
another opportunity another way to
1:32
attack me and that's why you know i have
1:35
to rely on my legal advice when it comes
1:39
to information about seth rich and his
1:41
involvement in the leaking of DNC emails
1:46
I'm just gonna add a little bit to that
1:48
look like I meant it patty put out a
1:51
solidarity statement with CEM a few
1:55
months ago about exactly this and the
1:58
reason that we put that out well there's
1:59
several reasons but primarily it is
2:02
because Kim as you know and as you've
2:05
heard on this very stream is a massive
2:07
supporter of WikiLeaks and of Julian
2:09
Assange there is no way in hell
2:13
that Kim would make up or invent or lie
2:15
about a story in relation to WikiLeaks
2:20
especially in this condition he would
2:22
just never ever ever do it so it was
2:25
abundantly clear to us from the outset
2:27
look at what he was saying about this
2:28
was true he wouldn't be making a
2:30
statement there's absolutely no way that
2:32
he would have put WikiLeaks in a
2:34
situation to being jeopardized or anyone
2:36
else and I think that's why he's been
2:38
quite conservative rightly so about what
2:41
he will or won't reveal when also the
2:44
family as he said did contact him and
2:46
asked him not to release the information
2:48
so it's ironic that his respecting of
2:51
the family's decision has then hold
2:53
against him and the other thing I would
2:56
say about this is that I recently wrote
2:59
an article called
3:01
someone is long-playing to see Richards
3:04
family about Kim calm if you go and read
3:07
through that maze only about 30,000
3:10
people actually read it
3:11
it completely debunks all of the
3:14
allegations made against Kim by aids the
3:18
public in the public statement of the
3:20
sifrits family so somebody had taken but
3:23
it was very interesting actually because
3:25
smears were given to see Richards family
3:29
about Kim that related to events
3:32
happening and that happened in the last
3:34
political election in 2014 but I was at
3:38
those events and I saw and covered and
3:41
have footage of it and wrote articles
3:43
about and took photos of what really did
3:46
happen and what really did happen is not
3:49
what's authorities family are being told
3:51
happened so the my article is
3:54
meticulously sourced so if you go
3:56
through and read for yourself you will
3:58
discover that in fact someone has been
4:00
lying to death Richards family about Kim
4:02
calm and you might want to ask yourself
4:04
some questions about why they're doing
4:06
that what is their agenda what do they
4:09
stand to gain especially if you realize
4:11
that those people are very much in the
4:15
pro-hillary
4:16
anti WikiLeaks crowd and you soon
4:20
discover that this issue is much bigger
4:22
than just Kim and it actually goes right
4:26
to the top
4:27
so just don't take things at face value
4:29
just cuz you're told
4:30
oh come head in front didn't give it so
4:32
therefore he didn't have any no dig
4:34
deeper and say the truth is actually a
4:37
lot more complex and and a lot more
4:39
involved and you've been led to believe
4:40
and what I would like to add to that is
4:44
that please don't criticize me for doing
4:48
the legally prudent thing if you
4:51
criticize anyone criticize the
4:55
Department of Justice and Special
4:58
Counsel Miller who has received a
5:01
detailed letter from us we haven't even
5:06
gotten any reply how can the person who
5:10
has been men dated with investigating
5:14
the very issue that I'm talking about
5:17
that I'm offering to provide evidence
5:21
for how's that very person not
5:23
interested in hearing from me that is a
5:27
question you should ask yourself and
5:29
that is someone you should criticize for
5:32
not doing their job because the truth in
5:36
in my mind why they are not coming back
5:39
to me as inconvenient it does not marry
5:43
with the narrative of Russian hacking it
5:47
does not work to call Trump a coup
5:52
looter with Russia in the last election
5:56
if the investigation body in the United
6:01
States will actually look at this
6:03
evidence this investigation would be
6:05
over in no time so mr. Miller is showing
6:10
what his interest really is I suspect he
6:14
is a deep state actor and the deep state
6:17
has not expected Trump to win they have
6:21
actually moved their entire power their
6:25
media influence their media ops against
6:28
Trump and Trump has won against the
6:32
wishes of the lead establishment system
6:36
in the United States and they're trying
6:39
to get rid of him
6:40
and this investigation has not done what
6:45
it's mandated to do just on the Russian
6:50
hacking front - I think we should
6:52
acknowledge that Edward Snowden has said
6:54
that he believes that it probably was
6:55
some Russian meddling in the u.s.
6:57
election on the basis that there this is
7:01
what all of these spy agencies do to
7:02
everyone and if we look at what the
7:06
WikiLeaks documents that were released a
7:08
few months ago that showed the CIA's
7:10
dispatch orders to the New Zealand
7:12
government spies to dispatch them to the
7:15
French election the two middle in the
7:18
French presidential election we do see
7:21
that in fact our own countries have been
7:23
involved in election meddling as part of
7:26
the course and even been dispatched by a
7:27
foreign power to do so however the
7:31
technical evidence has been supplied to
7:33
prove that the DNC leaks were in fact
7:37
the files were taken were obtained
7:40
locally they were not an external as a
7:43
result of an external hack so a CEM is
7:46
entirely correct - that this issue of
7:49
Russian hacking has been politicized by
7:51
the same people who are involved in the
7:54
most serious and wide reaching political
7:56
espionage and hacking operations and
7:58
with the greatest facilities and budgets
8:00
to do so of anyone in the world so you
8:04
will hear Russia Russia Russia hacking
8:06
hacking hacking you don't hear us
8:08
sending New Zealand to middle in the
8:10
French election so you've really got to
8:12
just take a step back and ask yourself
8:14
is this really about Russia or is it
8:16
about serving the political interests of
8:18
the intelligence agencies of the United
8:20
States which unfortunately a lot of the
8:22
problems that we face in this world
8:24
track directly back to if you do the
8:26
research and if you find the truth and
8:28
one more important thing about that we
8:32
know from a WikiLeaks release of
8:36
wildseven that the CIA has tools to
8:41
basically create a fingerprint of any
8:46
party in any hacking incident so if the
8:49
CIA goes out and hack someone
8:53
they have the tool set to make it look
8:56
like it was Russia to make it look like
8:59
it was China to make it look like it was
9:02
anybody but the CIA so when you have
9:06
these intelligence agencies issuing
9:09
reports about we believe with almost
9:13
certainty that it was Russia and then
9:16
not honesty disclosing that they have
9:20
the very technology to make anyone look
9:23
like the perpetrator that is the epitome
9:27
of dishonesty and it just shows that
9:31
these agencies cannot be trusted they
9:34
point the finger at someone without
9:37
disclosing that they have the technology
9:39
to make anyone look like the perpetrator
9:50
you