Lesta

8 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-03-06 1240 +Peekay Truth

Mar 5th, 2017
320
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.12 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-03-06 1240 +Peekay Truth
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYSwkbSfkNw&lc=z13fudygtyjngfzlo23tenxwlvugilxbz04
  3. https://pastebin.com/D2kwpGM7
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Peekay Truth __ *ATTENTION:* This reply has been copied to my Google Plus for *all to see* because you - Mr "HIDES the TRUTH" are *addicted to dishonesty* and forced to censor genuine criticism while yourself hypocritically crying about being "silenced".
  7.  
  8.  
  9. That "icon" you say got moved so it wouldn't seem "suspicious" that he didn't get hit or killed *TOLD YOU HE SAW PEOPLE GETTING HIT BY A CAR*.
  10.  
  11.  
  12. Therefore if no one died or got hurt on that day then that "icon" *must also be in on the "no car" conspiracy* - right? Of course he must.
  13.  
  14.  
  15. _And so why would you believe *anything* he says?_
  16.  
  17.  
  18. Actually - it seems you *didn't* believe anything he said *except* for just that *one thing* he said which supported your "no car" conspiracy theory. That was when he responded "yeah" to being moved "the day before".
  19.  
  20.  
  21. However - that *disabled gentleman* sure said "yeah" a lot. I would not be surprised if he responded "yeah" had you asked him whether he thought "Tony Abbott is also Tony Blair". Responding "yeah" to strangers seemed more like a *coping mechanism* (and a polite way to get you to f_kc off) than a serious response to your questions.
  22.  
  23.  
  24. But here's what's interesting. The gentleman you "interviewed" *stated that he saw several people getting hit behind him* - so can you explain why you then quickly interjected and suggested that wasn't possible?
  25.  
  26.  
  27. Remind me Mr "HIDES the TRUTH" - who was there as a witness? Was it you or him?
  28.  
  29.  
  30. Of course it's always possible that people *did* get hit by a car behind him *if the police were also running down people*.
  31.  
  32.  
  33. Can you explain why you won't examine that possibility?
  34.  
  35.  
  36. Didn't the police treat you "poorly" just recently? Why would you be protecting the police by drawing attention *away* from that possibility?
  37.  
  38.  
  39. Are you working for the police - Mr "HIDES the TRUTH"? Or is it just your relentless *incompetence* that brings about the same outcome?
  40.  
  41.  
  42. You are a *fake truther* "Peekay". You are a "poser". Your days "HIDING the TRUTH" from the *genuine truth community* are nearing an end.
  43.  
  44.  
  45. More and more people are wising up to you *which is why you are now forced to moderate and censor comments*.
  46.  
  47.  
  48. You are evidently becoming *desperate*.
  49.  
  50.  
  51. Tick-tock little liar whose videos only ever seem to benefit the very groups of people you claim to speak out against. _Tick-tock_.
  52.  
  53.  
  54. There is a *considerable backlash* coming your way and the dummies who you are duping *are going to turn on you*. )))
  55.  
  56.  
  57. ______________________________________________________________
  58. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  59.  
  60. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  61. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  62.  
  63. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  64. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  65.  
  66. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  67. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  68.  
  69. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  70. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  71.  
  72. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  73. What exists - exists to always exist.
  74. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment