Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Return-Path: <auth-results@verifier.port25.com>
- Delivered-To: sylvia@kladler.at
- Received: from mail.kladler.at
- by mail.kladler.at with LMTP id 67yWINoU1VitbQAApIwJZw
- for <sylvia@kladler.at>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:45:14 +0100
- Received: from mail.kladler.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
- by mail.kladler.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3DB8051E619
- for <sylvia@kladler.at>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:45:11 +0100 (CET)
- Authentication-Results: mail.kladler.at; dkim=pass
- reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key"
- header.d=port25.com header.i=auth-results@verifier.port25.com
- header.b=b9psAflx; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy);
- dkim-atps=neutral
- X-Fuglu-Suspect: 7b4951ed1ba148b4921de5392feb0a99
- X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO
- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.kladler.at
- X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
- SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
- Received: from verifier.port25.com (verifier.port25.com [38.95.177.125])
- by mail.kladler.at (Postfix) with ESMTPS
- for <sylvia@kladler.at>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:45:11 +0100 (CET)
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=verifier201208; d=port25.com;
- h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id; i=auth-results@verifier.port25.com;
- bh=VPJPPoVFcjwOW1agqXWq3OHgS7U=;
- b=b9psAflxc0LUGqZs5j76oI0u5e1wKr3yKAJk0SX83G5JnC7O0AqtOIoXVPup0HGH5YQGg7CS7FV7
- Ng/3KrxFwuKObKUEaClita4kPvrCtlgHefAm4XpyCtnoKsAaqY9g18P6kmRXZRUIpByCVHmBryc5
- dDKWvxfa3SgFuvnINrystodCkhs9fiTe2pe2lz6gPqzxBqp+xHyqp+7E21XSnqICSzUggLUjejau
- bERb0yRQyY62pvOKhLMja5iyWA7+Nn7ticNJLWT4096hL5YxWE85hSzJUJOin2mAdR7fq5oLX7Ld
- 1BmRW44vEdt8ks0oAOeP/QdB6uVgplhO8xXN0g==
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=verifier201208; d=port25.com;
- b=SJZkXCP2/hTH+eHLBcu9kj8RxoEv5nN9k4Lq9q0ZlczOXOOk/O4fACBY+GUiyHxYVgFJKt9HNEp8
- owESFDGoNQ0mKlf3+5b1SJOrynDr6RpdXKOlvetbipJc6IUBENMC/J3UMttdy/egaU1hwGE4k7Kj
- 5F/VXidMmk7HNIoQH5QcW208jFWBHea3qaTWv4R6MoWSt6FTgPRp/dgh/ink4DYAmVOnefqq6+ie
- WPl9R/4O70p2bRgtW+i+bJiQL2h8D+g7qh6OOhEMmuMyF1x8+A7OXwwpAkBw9pPmkjl9iTIY7Fx5
- ZhWWm3rhmsRQnlq/hyJZS+Fsh92c97YCZtjBiA==;
- Received: from verifier.port25.com (127.0.0.1) by verifier.port25.com id hqkagg20i3gm for <sylvia@kladler.at>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:45:56 -0400 (envelope-from <auth-results@verifier.port25.com>)
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:45:56 -0400
- From: auth-results@verifier.port25.com
- To:
- Subject: Authentication Report
- Message-Id: <1490359548-918004@verifier.port25.com>
- Precedence: junk (auto_reply)
- This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
- service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform
- a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided
- free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While
- it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
- <verifier-feedback@port25.com>.
- Thank you for using the verifier,
- The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
- ==========================================================
- Summary of Results
- ==========================================================
- SpamAssassin check: ham
- ==========================================================
- Details:
- ==========================================================
- HELO hostname:
- Source IP:
- mail-from:
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- SpamAssassin check details:
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07)
- Result: ham (-1.8 points, 5.0 required)
- pts rule name description
- ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
- 0.0 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
- [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=sylvia%40kladler.at;ip=134.255.226.90;r=verifier.port25.com]
- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
- [score: 0.0000]
- 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
- 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
- 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available.
- ==========================================================
- Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
- ==========================================================
- SPF and Sender-ID Results
- =========================
- "none"
- No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.
- "neutral"
- The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
- want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
- to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.
- "pass"
- The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
- relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.
- "policy"
- The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
- of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
- method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
- unacceptable.
- "fail"
- This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
- relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.
- "softfail"
- The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
- to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
- unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.
- "temperror"
- The message could not be verified due to some error that
- is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
- retrieve a policy record from DNS. A later attempt may produce a
- final result.
- "permerror"
- The message could not be verified due to some error that
- is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
- a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. A later attempt is
- unlikely to produce a final result.
- DKIM and DomainKeys Results
- ===========================
- "none"
- The message was not signed.
- "pass"
- The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
- acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
- verification tests.
- "fail"
- The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
- acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
- test(s).
- "policy"
- The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
- not acceptable to the verifier.
- "neutral"
- The message was signed but the signature or signatures
- contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
- processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other
- failures not covered elsewhere in this list.
- "temperror"
- The message could not be verified due to some error that
- is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
- to retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a
- final result.
- "permerror"
- The message could not be verified due to some error that
- is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
- absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.
- ==========================================================
- Original Email
- ==========================================================
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement