Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Dec 4th, 2019
128
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.81 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:56:04 AM
  2. their acceptance of the prerequisite Coalition B demand for an acceptance of a surrender once other terms have been negotiated.
  3.  
  4. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:56:07 AM
  5. means absolutely fuck all
  6.  
  7. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:56:18 AM
  8. Enough legalese to tell them to fuck off 😛
  9.  
  10. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:56:23 AM
  11. I should have done law 😢
  12.  
  13. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:56:38 AM
  14. Not really
  15.  
  16. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:56:58 AM
  17. The agreement was basically upheld
  18.  
  19. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:57:13 AM
  20. not really.
  21.  
  22. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:57:24 AM
  23. They aren't opening discussions of their surrender.
  24.  
  25. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:57:24 AM
  26. They admitted they loss by starting they would accept surrender as a term
  27.  
  28. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:57:45 AM
  29. They said they would accept that surrender _could_ be a term
  30.  
  31. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:57:59 AM
  32. once all other terms are done
  33.  
  34. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:58:03 AM
  35. the intent is very different.
  36.  
  37. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:58:04 AM
  38. Besides I really see duck all reason to keep kerchtog at war at this point
  39.  
  40. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:58:13 AM
  41. 4.5 is enough
  42.  
  43. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:58:24 AM
  44. Ummm honestly? I see enough reason to keep them in waar
  45.  
  46. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:58:29 AM
  47. for another few months
  48.  
  49. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:58:48 AM
  50. or longer
  51.  
  52. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:58:49 AM
  53. I mean I think NPO is literally the only alliance that can sustain that
  54.  
  55. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:58:50 AM
  56. idc
  57.  
  58. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:59:01 AM
  59. I mean everyone theoretically could
  60.  
  61. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:59:04 AM
  62. So unless you want to fund literally everyone
  63.  
  64. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:59:05 AM
  65. moving into war time econ
  66.  
  67. Keshav11/3/2019, 12:59:08 AM
  68. _not_ that hard
  69.  
  70. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 12:59:40 AM
  71. I talked to leo about this already anyways
  72.  
  73. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:00:35 AM
  74. Imho we are just hurting ourselves at this point. They leaked the members their going to leak, their rss are barley depleting at this point
  75.  
  76. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:00:42 AM
  77. Amongst other things
  78.  
  79. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:07 AM
  80. they haven't atrophied enough.
  81.  
  82. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:01:11 AM
  83. And I can understand war to this point, like I’m on board however really past this point we’re overdoing it
  84.  
  85. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:14 AM
  86. And that'll set in.
  87.  
  88. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:01:25 AM
  89. and its actually going to hurt the game
  90.  
  91. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:30 AM
  92. if you drag it longer and make the situation _even_ more hopeless.
  93.  
  94. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:01:32 AM
  95. And I quite enjoy this game
  96.  
  97. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:36 AM
  98. You don't get it do you?
  99.  
  100. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:42 AM
  101. They _would_ put us to the sword.
  102.  
  103. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:01:47 AM
  104. i.e kill our communities if they can.
  105.  
  106. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:02:01 AM
  107. Being all moraistic about shitlords who're out to _kill_ us
  108.  
  109. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:02:04 AM
  110. helps nobody.
  111.  
  112. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:02:33 AM
  113. I mean I can see that possibility sure however just because their ass hats does not mean we should do the same
  114.  
  115. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:02:43 AM
  116. A eye for a eye makes the whole world blind ?
  117.  
  118. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:02:51 AM
  119. no, this is a zero sum game
  120.  
  121. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:09 AM
  122. and in 10 years I don't want to be like I had that opportunity to kil lthem, andd I didnt hoping they'd be "nice" to us
  123.  
  124. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:11 AM
  125. fuck that shit.
  126.  
  127. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:24 AM
  128. What benefits the enemy, harms you; and what benefits you, harm the enemy.
  129.  
  130. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:03:34 AM
  131. I don’t really think we’re being nice
  132.  
  133. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:03:43 AM
  134. Lol that’s a bit of a overstatement
  135.  
  136. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:17 AM
  137. I'm in it to ensure they are fucked enough to not be a threat in a few months time.
  138.  
  139. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:29 AM
  140. All of this effort for nothing is stupid
  141.  
  142. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:34 AM
  143. if we're gonna get our asses handed to us
  144.  
  145. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:39 AM
  146. because we can't see it through.
  147.  
  148. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:43 AM
  149. Much like they would have.
  150.  
  151. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:05:20 AM
  152. If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.
  153.  
  154. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:05:22 AM
  155. 😉
  156.  
  157. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:05:30 AM
  158. Anyways I’m to tired to debate this l, at this point I’m in favor of peace but in a final note just because your enemy did not compliantly die does not make you lost
  159.  
  160. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:05:41 AM
  161. Chaos is collapsed and I mean literally
  162.  
  163. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:05:46 AM
  164. It’s disbanding
  165.  
  166. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:05:58 AM
  167. Multiple players dead
  168.  
  169. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:06:11 AM
  170. It will take them forever to recover
  171.  
  172. ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:06:26 AM
  173. But if we keep going we’re gonna be in the same boat :p
  174.  
  175. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:06:54 AM
  176. I doubt it 😛
  177.  
  178. Keshav11/3/2019, 1:07:00 AM
  179. Chaos is not dead enough :3
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement