JaysonSunshine

DeathSyn and the insufficiency of 'libertarianism'

Aug 19th, 2020
164
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.27 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. Death_Syn
  3. I tend to buy yokohama when it comes to tires
  4. Death_Syn
  5. my stinger came with michelin pilot sport 4s
  6. Death_Syn
  7. probably going to replace with yokohama advan sport A/S+
  8. 13:32 Death_Syn
  9. when these wear down
  10. abumfone has left IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
  11. infspire
  12. Death_Syn: Are you a Trump supporter?
  13. paven has joined ([email protected])
  14. b30wulf has set topic: <drPrimate> if china had AI they would probably attempt to make capitalism fail
  15. lockie has changed mode: +t
  16. Death_Syn
  17. infspire: no
  18. infspire
  19. Thank you.
  20. Death_Syn
  21. The last time I didn't vote a straight L ticket was 2000
  22. infspire
  23. Death_Syn: Who do you plan on voting for this November?
  24. Death_Syn
  25. Jo Joregensen
  26. Death_Syn
  27. s/e//
  28. bbbuni
  29. are you serious?
  30. bbbuni
  31. you're just voting for Trump
  32. infspire
  33. Death_Syn: My politics are close to green politics. That is, I hate Joe Biden a pretty substantial amount and think he's terrible for the well-being of the USA. However, I think I have an even greater ethical duty to get rid of Trump, i.e. harm mitigation.
  34. bbbuni
  35. because taking a vote away from Biden is voting for Trump
  36. infspire
  37. How do you respond to that as somebody that won't be voting to get rid of Trump in November?
  38. bbbuni
  39. yes it is
  40. bbbuni
  41. trump is going to win because of all you idiots
  42. infspire
  43. bbbuni: I think it's pretty wild that somebody would vote for a third-party candidate that has no chance of winning in this election.
  44. Death_Syn
  45. bbbuni: in Txas, a vote not for trump hurts trump
  46. bbbuni
  47. bullshit
  48. bbbuni
  49. yeah
  50. lockie has changed mode: -t
  51. bbbuni
  52. don't call me an idiot
  53. infspire
  54. Death_Syn: Not voting for Biden is mathematically equivalent to increasing Trump's votes by one.
  55. bbbuni
  56. you're the one voting for trump
  57. bbbuni
  58. you guys are just being ridiculous
  59. bbbuni
  60. you should know better
  61. infspire
  62. Biden has X votes and Trump has Y votes. The difference ix X - Y.
  63. infspire
  64. Add a vote to Y: X - (Y + 1) = X - Y - 1.
  65. infspire
  66. Now, remove a vote for Biden you could cast, but won't because of voting for an entity that will not win: (X - 1) - Y = X - Y - 1.
  67. Death_Syn
  68. ^^
  69. infspire
  70. Death_Syn: You're libertarian. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, libertarians in the Weimar Republic worked with National Socialism to defeat democratic socialism and communism. What ethical duties do you have in 2020, learning from this event?
  71. infspire
  72. I presume you would not have liked, from your vantage point in 2020, to have helped National Socialism.
  73. Death_Syn
  74. it's all national socialism from my view
  75. infspire
  76. Can you explicate key elements of "all" in this context?
  77. Death_Syn
  78. any vote for a candidate that isn't committed to dismantling the government is a vote for bigger government which will inevitably be used against me
  79. infspire
  80. I see.
  81. infspire
  82. Death_Syn: Given you're for dismantling the American government, how would you defend yourself against various 4th-generation warfare operations by China and Russia against the United States?
  83. infspire
  84. For example, the ongoing hybrid-warfare operations against the 2020 election in which you'll be voting to "dismantle" the US government.
  85. Death_Syn
  86. the Soviet Union ran the US state department for half of the last century
  87. infspire
  88. Or, the ongoing amplification of anti-mask and anti-COVID-19 mitigation policies by China and Russia as part of a hybrid biowarfare operations?
  89. infspire
  90. Death_Syn: During which years?
  91. Death_Syn
  92. jerrycurl: the Soviet Union had agents installed at all levels (including the top for a while) of the State Department
  93. infspire
  94. Death_Syn: You are not addressing my claims.
  95. infspire
  96. You are mostly repeating your talking points, though.
  97. dini has joined ([email protected])
  98. dini
  99. hey bougyman
  100. infspire
  101. Which, I find, libertarians often do, as it's not an empirically sound ideology, but one based only on first principles.
  102. infspire
  103. Notably, engineering using only first principles is currently employed nowhere on Earth in any domain of engineering.
  104. dini
  105. bougyman: nuttin much. my tent and woodstove shipped this week
  106. dini
  107. ordering a composting toilet and small 400w solar kit soon
  108. dini
  109. oh man, I can't. I've got serious time issues
  110. infspire
  111. In every domain of engineering, there is an interaction between first principles, like the non-aggression principle, with empirical data gathered during iterative processes in prototypes are deployed in the real world.
  112. dini
  113. jerrycurl: Well I'm at an rv park for the summer after I sold my house this spring. prior to that it was parked at my house.
  114. infspire
  115. Notably, society is far more complex than engineering bridges, or large hadron colliders, or GPT-3.
  116. infspire
  117. As you weaken the United States, you strength anti-humanitarian governments -- worldwide -- in China and Russia.
  118. infspire
  119. As you strengthen the United States, you partially strengthen anti-humanitarian efforts -- worldwide -- emanating from the United States.
  120. infspire
  121. The goal, then, is to *appropriately* empower government in the right ways at the right times, while *appropriately* disempowering it in the right ways at the right times.
  122. infspire
  123. The function appropriate() is very hard to discern, and is the result of an intergenerational effort among humans.
  124. infspire
  125. Or, you an go with libertarian first principles that take into account very little empirical data.
  126. infspire
  127. That's my take, as a former American libertarian who integrated increasing amounts of empirical data and modified into green politics.
  128. infspire
  129. I will now set a timer for Death_Syn, as they made multiple claims and had core challenges to their positions made.
  130. infspire
  131. Prediction: No meaningful responses from Death_Syn on any questions, revealing them as a person who doesn't engage in #philosophy, which is inherently contradictory.
  132. dini
  133. bougyman: solar patio sounds awesome
  134. infspire
  135. Jorgensen has characterized the U.S. government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic as overly bureaucratic and authoritarian, calling restrictions on individual behavior such as stay-at-home orders and corporate bailouts, "the biggest assault on our liberties in our lifetime".[37][40][44]
  136. infspire
  137. infspire
  138. infspire
  139. Death_Syn: Who do you plan on voting for this November?
  140. infspire
  141. Death_Syn
  142. infspire
  143. Jo Joregensen
  144. dini
  145. Just wait until you need a vaccine and microchip with central bank digital currency wallet contained in the chip too
  146. dini
  147. in order to go anywhere or even work
  148. infspire
  149. So, Joregensen is an anti-mask conspiracy theorist.
  150. dini
  151. that's what's coming
  152. infspire
  153. Pretty impressive.
  154. infspire
  155. Imagine being a 'white' person, and thinking that being asked/required to wear a mask during a once-in-a-century pandemic is "the biggest assault on our liberties in our lifetime".
  156. infspire
  157. How pathetic.
  158. infspire
  159. It's not the spying by the government after 9/11.
  160. dini
  161. "once in a century pandemic" lololol
  162. infspire
  163. It's not the mistreatment and killing of Native Americans and 'blacks' by police.
  164. infspire
  165. dini: I put you on block with no expiration date.
  166. infspire
  167. It's not the employment of COINTELPRO by the US government to disrupt leftist groups in the United States.
  168. infspire
  169. It's not the gaslighting by the US government about weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq War.
  170. infspire
  171. No, it's being required, in a once-in-a-century pandemic to wear a mask in public.
  172. infspire
  173. Jorgensen is now banned.
  174. freekoala
  175. 1957 and 1968
  176. infspire
  177. All supporters of Jorgensen, that, at minimum do not address that topic in a satisfactory way are now banned.
  178. infspire
  179. freekoala: What are you referencing?
  180. freekoala
  181. nothing. never mind. i don't actually want to jump into anything.
  182. infspire
  183. 1) Some people are born with more genetic resources than other people.
  184. infspire
  185. 2) Those people do not want to overly contribute to society, as they're above average.
  186. infspire
  187. 3) These people posit libertarian ideology, as society, they perceive primarily hurts them to help others.
  188. infspire
  189. 4) You cannot build civilizations in this manner.
  190. infspire
  191. 5) A global species, as humans are, coupled with our technological prowess in energy production, mass media, and transportation require us to participate in global civilization, independent of how we feel about it.
  192. infspire
  193. Death_Syn: Your time has expired.
  194. infspire
  195. You are now blocked for as long as there is a Trump in the White House. Next update: 2021-01-20 12:00 EST.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment