lol

this might help you Vee I cant sleep so I wrote it down
General principles of the Alt-Right :
General themes  - To not consider out ancestors judgement to be less valid than ours,
that most of society is in some way or another misguided or decieved to differing extents.

number 1  -      Race Realism /  Human Biodiversity
The Alt-Right suggests that there are differences in outcome of the races which is greater than can be explained by environment or circumstance or luck,   they suggest that each race on average has a differing character and cognitive / social potential.    This is either due to evolutionary pressures,  crossbreeding with other human-like animals such as neanderthals,  or randomness + gene distillation following the Out Of Africa migration  ( they also don't rule out the possibility that this theory is entirely wrong,  although it is based on genetic shared ancestor techniques and not purely archeology ) .
The different genes prevelant in each race affect IQ and behavioural traits such as aggression, aggreeableness,  independance etc,    leading to a set of possible resulting cultures and societal structures that race could potentially form depending on the environment.
In this sense it could be viewed that races are similar to subspecies of dogs,   they all have varying physical characteristics and temprements,  but they are still considered a 'dog' and can therefore interbreed.
number 2 -   accepting most of the observations of the skeptic / anti-SJW / MGTOW / MRA / Classic Liberal / Alt-Lite  communities,    for example intersectional feminism is unworkable, logically inconsistent,  hateful  etc,     that western society is gynocentric and life is becoming harder for men in different ways,  while marriage rates drop and single parent households increase,  the middle class is decreasing etc,   and communism is a growing threat to society,
however the important difference is that the Alt-Right takes these viewpoints for granted and devotes less time to thinking about it,    they see it as perhaps inevitable repeating of history,   or secondary to larger problems.
number 3 - heritage,  nationalism,  tradition, religion
The Alt-Right oppose globalism and the mass mixing of demographics and cultures
because they believe it will eventually create a homogenous society,  where everyone in the world looks similar,  dresses similar, speaks the same language,  consumes the same media and eats the same brands of food,   supermarkets replace local markets and chains like mcdonalds replace most restaurants,   local customs die out which accelerates this further.
They prefer small local governments  because in the opposite there is no accountability or personal connection / shared investment and people are not engaged or informed in politics,   an extension of what we see with the EU.
They 'have pride in the achievements of those of the same skin color '  because they feel they are responsible to respect and preserve the knowledge or artifacts created by their ancestors,   because they are most directly exposed to it,  and genetically suited to understanding its value or making best use of it,  and or because of the direct line of inheritance,   this is the concept of 'heritage'.
The Alt-Right are often respectful or experienced with religion,   they view it not neccesarily as an alternative to science,  but as moral or philosophical instruction, as explained by Dr Jordan Peterson.
number 4 -  opposition to 'degeneracy',   'nihilism' and 'hedonism'
The Alt-Right believe that peoples lifestyles and perspectives have gradually changed since around WW2,   they seem to attribute this to guiding cultural factors combined with individualism and the decline in nationalism,    people have lost a sense of purpose in life besides generating money and exchanging it for 'short term' instant gratification type of fun,
for example they criticize they use of pornography as opposed to developing meaningful relationships with people,   they also see it in the lack of traditional art and architecture,  and the way people dress.   They say this attitude is typically shown most strongly in progressive millenials.
 note : this concept is somewhat hard to describe in words
number 5 -  opposition to civic nationalism / classical libertarianism
while they are not directly opposed or have no common ground / crossover or sympathy for these philosophies,    they view them as ineffective strategies to achieve their desired goals,
Classical liberalism they view as the 'default' political position,  as such it is the most 'safe' and least effort / thinking required.  They think it lacks 'punch',  it doesn't appeal to people because it doesn't offer something new, exciting, revolutionary like communism etc,   and its too forgiving of individuals or groups that seek the destruction of the society and therefore classical liberalism itself.    The existance of extreme political standpoints with large followings,  shifts the 'overton window',  the set of ideas deemed appropriate by society.  This happens because most people especially women simply follow the prevailing narrative.
They also believe that ineffective government under centre-left rule may lead to a 'race war' of some type either in the US or Europe,  which will require an organized far right movement to rectify.
Certain tenets such as allowing women the right to vote they would probably outright disagree with.
Civic nationalism they oppose because they think having certain races in a white country is suboptimal and increases crime rates while lowering productivity / social cohesion / happiness levels,   increasing taxes etc,   but also because people are naturally tribalistic,  so conflicts of some sort will always occur even if genetics are not a relevant factor,     (  important to stress that multiculturalism is somewhat of an unprecedented experiment )