Model M invites revision of Model A relations

See: https://pastebin.com/edit/suRNUsA2

As a byproduct of making the above argument, Model M type notation turns out remarkably convenient for identifying groups of people from competitive quadra that share the trait of neither valuing nor being strong with regards to a specific information element. Such a hard limit can be a rationally attractive basis for cooperation.

Duality isn't a good way to group people from competitive quadra because then the pairs would compete against each other.

Interestingly enough, in terms of Model A relations:
* The NeXX pair would be CMP but the XXNe pair would be LKL.
* The quadra pairs are MRR.
* FiNe is supervisor of NeTe, TeNe is supervisor of NeFi

The first item of the list invites revision of empirical evidence regarding Model A relations CMP and LKL. Now there's a reason to predict it's possible to interpret empirical findings in which these instances of CMP and LKL are, in fact, the same relation.

We could expand this group of 4 types to produce a group of 8 types in an attempt to include all quadra. There are a number of options regarding what approach to take. To turn the NeXX pair into supervisors seems bad because one's supervisee would be the other's conflictor.

Since there appears to be something wrong with the relations of LKL and CMP I'd use them as a basis for including new types. In Model A:
* LKL of NeTe is SiTe.
* LKL of NeFi is SiFi.
* CMP of TeNe is TeSi.
* CMP of FiNe is FiSi.

But this caused numerous new conflict relations in the ensuing group. So let's choose the quadra inverse of this group. That would be:
* NiFe
* FeNi
* NiTi
* TiNi

All of the newcomers would value sensing but sense weakly. However, the original purpose of the group of four was to be a non-Se group in which nobody values Se and nobody is strong at Se. An unintended side-effect of forming such a group was to produce a group in which nobody both values Ni and is strong at Ni. Since this wasn't intended, let us form the following group:
* NiFe
* FeNi
* NiTi
* TiNi
* NeFi
* FiNe
* NeTe
* TeNe

No member of this group both values sensing and senses strongly. So the group is biased against Sensing. Men who belong to this group are least likely to need to be told, by feminists, what are the rights feminism denies from them. Women expect them to want those rights because of some other men, but these men don't need those rights, so these men are unlikely to need to be told they can't have them.

This group of people happens to be least jealous so they would be most suited for polyamory, but there would be no relations of duality. The inverse of this group of people would be most compliant with hierarchies of power.