API tools faq
paste
Lesta

12 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-22 1050 +cabadejo

Lesta
Feb 21st, 2016
111
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.54 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-22 1050 +cabadejo
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/hb82TArNbo7
  3. https://pastebin.com/BMUQuNEQ
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +cabadejo __ I have to power down very soon but I will leave you with a question.
  8.  
  9. With every occurrence of the "scrolling glitch" we know there are shenanigans. With that "CNN" video there is weirdness in that "CNN" have seemingly hidden that video (they posted two videos but only one shows up).
  10.  
  11. I have presented evidence of "Peekay" being deceitful. I thought this place was a bunch of "thinkers" (oh my was I wrong).
  12.  
  13. I presented evidence. If a person cannot adequately explain the "scrolling glitch" then the correct thing to do is explore the question "Why?"
  14.  
  15. Instead of doing that for themselves they have asked me. But it is not my job to think for people.
  16.  
  17. The question is: "Why might 'Peekay' lie?"
  18.  
  19. Put aside the hidden video weirdness (it looks like it was some kind of experiment - but that's speculation).
  20.  
  21. "Peekay" has a reputation for "truth bombing videos".
  22.  
  23. What happens if someone else has beaten him to it?
  24.  
  25. What happens if "Peekay" wants to "truth bomb" a video but it already has a lot of dislikes?
  26.  
  27. What is a liar to do?
  28.  
  29. Is there an incentive for a liar to post a video requesting a "truth bomb" where the thumbs down count is quite low?
  30.  
  31. What impression might a "Peekay" viewer get if they go to the video and suddenly see hundreds of thumbs down?
  32.  
  33. Suppose I were to tell my audience to "truth bomb" videos. I might wait for "Peekay" to truth bomb a video and then post a doctored video where the thumbs down is quite low. Anyone who checks out the video and sees that there is a high thumbs down will think what?
  34.  
  35. They will think I have influence - yes?
  36.  
  37. If you go to a video that has a lot of thumbs down (after seeing it with only a few) might you feel more inclined or less inclined to participate?
  38.  
  39. Ugh - I have answered my own question for you.
  40.  
  41. People have wanted evidence - I have given PLENTY.
  42.  
  43. People have wanted a reason - I have given A GOOD ONE.
  44.  
  45. So why are people remaining as loyalists?
  46.  
  47. Belief control.
  48.  
  49. By the way - the "ISS" video I am working on deals with the "Sunni Williams" tour. Isn't it curious that other truther channels are posting about it?
  50.  
  51. Isn't it curious that just a few days ago some crazy person was accusing me of copying the content from other channels?
  52.  
  53. When I post my "ISS" video that covers the "Sunni Williams" tour I'll have to include screenshots where I talk about covering it BEFORE the other truther channels have covered it.
  54.  
  55. Don't forget that somehow "Peekay" saw our messages.
  56.  
  57. This is a strange place - huh!
  58.  
  59. If you see this "soon" and reply I'll probably read it before I drift off asleep. Just wanted to thank you for being around these past weeks and months. I know it hasn't been easy and things are going to get even worse!
  60.  
  61.  
  62. ________
  63.  
  64. UPDATE:
  65.  
  66.  
  67. +cabadejo __ Follow-up (scroll up). I was probably vague and misleading with my above message. That is because I am running at 2% efficiency.
  68.  
  69. What I am saying is this:
  70.  
  71. To make himself look good "Peekay" can "truth bomb" a video that has already been "truth bombed". All he has to do is doctor the screen-recording so that it looks like it has only a FEW thumbs down WHEN "Peekay" did his screen-recording.
  72.  
  73. *That way when people go to the link they will see MANY thumbs down and believe it is his influence.*
  74.  
  75. I have presented evidence of fraud. I have given a good reason for doing it. People can see his reaction to me - he has gone on the attack and not explained what should otherwise be an "innocent" explanation.
  76.  
  77. The "scrolling glitch" has no natural explanation because it is always associated with shenanigans.
  78.  
  79. "Peekay" has DELETED the channel which had those incriminating videos. That includes the original "poor me" video with his "333 view count" (that magically increased).
  80.  
  81. What more can people possibly want?
  82.  
  83. Anyway! Hopefully that makes a little more sense. I am practically typing with my eyes closed haha.
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. __________________________________________
  88. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  89. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  90.  
  91. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  92. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  93.  
  94. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  95. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  96.  
  97. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  98. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!