API tools faq
paste
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 0005 +nick williamson

Lesta
Feb 13th, 2016
42
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.52 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 0005 +nick Williamson
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGog8Bdy0aI&lc=z13jht14ekuhcfrud23cfxpaczznip0fv
  3. https://pastebin.com/BBmjxLEi
  4. standard reply
  5. __
  6.  
  7.  
  8. +nick williamson __ Howdy. *You have simultaneously understood and yet misunderstood this video.* The purpose of this video is to do just one thing which is to *categorically prove that an edit was made during a single smooth action.* Nothing more than that. You acknowledge that has happened and so that is the part you have understood.
  9.  
  10.  
  11. __
  12.  
  13.  
  14. First of all - an important note: Normally the editing of footage - _such as blending multiple takes together_ - is *not* controversial. However - because we are dealing with the alleged "ISS" it is *far more significant and controversial.*
  15.  
  16.  
  17. That is because *a consequence of cleverly blending multiple clips together is to create the effect of sustained duration "zero gravity".*
  18.  
  19.  
  20. If there does exist a permanent zero gravity environment then there is no need to do this (beyond editing footage to make a film about life aboard the alleged "ISS"). *However - if there does not exist a permanent zero gravity environment then cleverly stitching together briefer clips to form a single longer clip becomes a requirement in order to create the illusion of a permanent micro/zero gravity environment.*
  21.  
  22.  
  23. If all purported footage from the alleged "ISS" is stitched together then we are justified in doubting that there exists a permanent micro/zero gravity environment. Even if that were to be the case it would not follow that there is no real and manned "ISS" - but it would give us a significant and justified reason to doubt it.
  24.  
  25.  
  26. After all - what honest organisation would stitch together such footage in a very subtle way unless it had to? And so even though there *could* still be a real and manned "ISS" despite only existing footage that is all cleverly stitched together - the odds of it being real and manned approaches zero.
  27.  
  28.  
  29. The only proof that necessarily proves there is a permanent micro/zero gravity environment (what I call the "sufficient proof") is to see *sustained duration genuine micro/zero gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*
  30.  
  31.  
  32. This video serves as the first step toward building a case against the alleged "ISS". *The first step is to prove that "blending of multiple clips into one" does actually occur.* And this video undeniably proves it. *The next step is to prove that the blending also occurs in a very subtle way so as to not be (easily) detected - and I will write more about that in a moment.
  33.  
  34.  
  35. __
  36.  
  37.  
  38. Where you have misunderstood this video is if you think I am somehow claiming that because THIS footage happens to be edited in the way it is that the "ISS" itself is fake. No. *Of course that does not follow.* Of course it is a standard practice that people who are making films will blend together footage from multiple takes. _That is not at all the point of this video._
  39.  
  40.  
  41. That an edit (like this) exists is not in-and-of itself proof of a fake "ISS" and that is the error you have made (if you believe that is what is being asserted - _as your comment seems to imply_ - then you are mistaken).
  42.  
  43.  
  44. In this video *it is undeniable that multiple takes were used.* What is curious is that the person in the background appears to be wearing a different shirt. That is significant! Why? *Because that implies a potentially significant time-interval occurred between "takes" but yet the person we see brushing his teeth appears to be wearing the same clothing and is maintaining the same position and is even assuming (as much as possible) a similar facial expression as he was before AND throughout the teeth brushing!*
  45.  
  46.  
  47. That sure is a lot of effort to go to just to show us a guy brushing his teeth in zero gravity - _right?_ - It sure is!
  48.  
  49.  
  50. Furthermore - he evidently brushed his teeth during both takes. The only difference appears to be that with one take the camera is zoomed in. So it seems they filmed the brushing scene twice. Once at a normal zoom and then again - _possibly after a long time interval_ - while zoomed in. That sure is a lot of effort to go to just to show us a guy brushing his teeth in zero gravity. *_Oh my, just who does that?!_*
  51.  
  52.  
  53. But don't let that detail distract you. Remember: *the only point of this video is to categorically prove that multiple takes were definitely used and then blended together so as to appear as a single and seamless action.* Not as a perfectly seamless and undetectable join - no - the edit we see is obvious. It is a seamless action but no great effort has been made to make it appear perfectly seamless and undetectable. We simply see a seamless motion that is obviously edited together. That is undeniably proven in this video and thankfully you have been honest enough to acknowledge it! Thus the purpose of this video - _with you_ - has succeeded.
  54.  
  55.  
  56. As I write - in this instance the blending was obvious and undeniable. *However - it is in other instances - the clips have been cleverly stitched together in very subtle ways so as to not be noticed at all.*
  57.  
  58.  
  59. _That is where we are justified in being suspicious._
  60.  
  61.  
  62. This video simply says that multiple clips *have been* undeniably blended together. *In future videos I will be showing clips where the blending has been done in an extremely subtle way.* Why is that important? Simply put: *An honest organisation has no need to ever be that "subtle".* An honest organisation does not need to go to all that trouble. Certainly not for the alleged "ISS" which predominantly has an audience of children (or adults who have audiences of children). Only a dishonest organisation that is seeking to deceive its audience would go to that kind of trouble - *_especially if it is done routinely._*
  63.  
  64.  
  65. However - there is one good reason such trouble would be taken. *And that is if there is not an endless supply of "zero gravity" available to whoever is filming.* In that case it would absolutely be a requirement to stitch together multiple briefer clips so as to create the appearance of a single longer duration clip. *Thus creating the illusion of there being a "permanent micro/zero gravity environment".*
  66.  
  67.  
  68. Since the alleged "ISS" is supposed to be a permanent micro/zero gravity environment then the mere fact that ANY of the footage would be found stitched together in such an incredibly subtle way *would be grounds for us to genuinely reject the "ISS".* _(Let alone if this is done routinely!)_
  69.  
  70.  
  71. We are justified in doubting the alleged "ISS" *if we do not ever see "sufficient proof" of it.* As I have mentioned (but will repeat because it is so important) *sufficient proof would be sustained duration genuine micro/zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*
  72.  
  73.  
  74. Such sufficient proof may seen picky and finicky _but really it isn't._ *Sufficient proof as I have described it could be easily filmed in the next five to ten minutes by "NASA" if they really wanted to.* A five minute zero-gravity gymnastics routine filmed from a single fixed camera would likely suffice (provided - _of course_ - it passed scrutiny). *Given that more than a decade and a half has elapsed since the alleged "ISS" has purportedly been manned the absence of sufficient proof is now glaring!* We would by now have reasonably expected to see it - even if only by chance or accident!
  75.  
  76.  
  77. How can it be that after 15 years there isn't a silly five minute video of two astronauts clowning about competing with each other to see who can do the most consecutive somersaults. How can it be that there hasn't been a ten minute game of space ping pong! People who believe the alleged "ISS" is real and manned will invent "plausible explanations" as to why such activities have not been filmed and those excuses will be limited only by their natural intelligence and imagination. Whatever the excuse may be - it does not change the fact it doesn't exist.
  78.  
  79.  
  80. Before you go and recommend that I watch one of the purported "ISS" tours just know that I have seen them all. I have examined them all closely. I am not new to this topic and I have given it a great deal of thought. The alleged "ISS" is what proves we are all living in a lie system (but this message is not about that). The "Sunita Williams" purported "tour" of the alleged "ISS" is the video that is recommended to me the most. I have posted a video about one of the other "tours" to my channel already but not the "Sunita" one.
  81.  
  82.  
  83. *None of the "tours" stand up to scrutiny.* Throughout the footage for each "tour" they all contain glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans. It is simply your pre-existing belief that it is real and manned that causes you to overlook all of the doubtable moments (and to tacitly suppress the doubt when it arises). If you believe something is real then you are not watching it from the perspective it is a movie or a magic trick. And so it becomes easy to just accept what you're seeing as real. Besides - who doesn't want to live in a world that has a real and manned "ISS"?! Who would want to live in a world where there is no real and manned "ISS" and instead we are lied to about there being one! That sounds like a horrible world that is full of horrible things!
  84.  
  85.  
  86. I have written extensively about all of these things elsewhere and I have already written enough here. If anyone reading this cares to know more then simply take a look at my Google Plus and my YouTube channel for more videos on the lie system.
  87.  
  88.  
  89. *In summary:* If there is a real and manned "ISS" then there is no good reason to ever "fake" any sustained duration micro/zero gravity footage. *And so if we see any evidence for faked sustained duration gravity [i.e., very subtle joins that are not supposed to be noticed/detected] then we effectively have evidence of fraud because it implies that whoever is filming the footage does not really have access to a genuinely permanent micro/zero gravity environment.*
  90.  
  91.  
  92.  
  93. __________________________________________
  94. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  95. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  96.  
  97. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  98. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  99.  
  100. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  101. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  102.  
  103. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  104. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!