API tools faq
paste
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-04-02 2155 +Freddie Sparks

Lesta
Apr 2nd, 2016
106
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.40 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-04-02 2155 +Freddie Sparks
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nuYfLMnbbk&lc=z12rjxeyxxfmvtri004cj1qrwym0idzwjtg0k
  3. https://pastebin.com/B31hExmw
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Freddie Sparks __ ::sigh:: Those who hate reading never have opinions worth knowing. You knew what you were getting yourself into by leaving a comment to Lesta that invited a response and a defence of my position. I can see that you're one of those intellectually insecure people who reflexively deflect by way of nit-picking on other people's characteristics. In a way you are like a weakling who points at a bodybuilder and laughs about how strong he is. *You f_kcing idiot*. _You have deserved every word of this opening paragraph._
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. Anthony B has asserted as a fact about reality that "Stefan Molyneux" is 100% "Jeff C" (and if you disagree you're a "shill" - as he started to imply about me). By contrast - my claim is that *it is reasonable to believe the woman had interviewed herself.*
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. When asked for evidence we find that Anthony B cannot give us any. His "evidence" is that "sometimes they sound alike". Beyond that - he claims to have "hard proof" but he's always too busy to present it. We just have to trust him - _you see._ And besides - he has been an "audio engineer for 20 years" and has attained an "expert level" at this kind of thing. On the other hand - *on making my claim* I presented *several key details* that suggests the woman had indeed interviewed herself. Certainly - it can be viewed in that way.
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Where Anthony B cannot discuss anything with anyone and repeats "trust me" - *I have been more than willing (and patient) to discuss this matter with those holding a dissenting view.*
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. I asked whether *YOU* thought "Stefan Molyneux" is ALSO playing the role of "Jeff C". It is hard to know your position *though you have not outright ruled it out.* That suggests you are *open to the possibility*. That you are open to the possibility is corroborated by what you wrote on another thread (screenshot or link can be provided if requested) where you wrote the following words: *_"The Justin/Krissy/jeff could all be fake beef to throw people off. So the situation is he can simply say Jeff is not Stefan if asked. There's alot of similar speech between Stefan/Jeff but also Justin/Jeff, might just be that they're all Canadian."_*
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. And so on that thread you are suggesting that the "Justin/Krissy/Jeff" drama could be "fake beef" to "throw good people off the scent" about "Stefan Molyneux" also being "Jeff C" because "Justin" (now "Avidan GodIsJust" haha) can then say "that's not him" (oh my crikey - you DO have an active imagination; I have to wonder why you're giving me a hard time).
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. You seem rather receptive to the claim proposed by Anthony B *that is based on nothing more* than your subjective ability to "hear" a similarity between two different voices. In my video it is also possible to get a "subjective sense" or feel that she had interviewed herself. Just as there are people who are saying "I can hear a similarity between Stefan M/Jeff C" there are people who are saying "I can see that she has interviewed herself". It is a subjective assessment. There are those who say they can hear no similarity between "Stefan M/Jeff C" (personally, I can hear some resemblance) and there are those (I assume you would be one of these people) who cannot see that the woman is interviewing herself (or can you and you're just being a pest?).
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. The claims of Anthony B and Lesta can both be thought of as "subjective feelings". It's just that *YOU* say you can "feel" it with Anthony B's claim but not mine. However - the crucial difference is that with the "Stefan M/Jeff C" claim you must be content with *only* that "subjective feeling" whereas in my video there are a number of objective and undeniable details that accompany any subjective feeling that might also be present.
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. Certainly - with what I have pointed out in this video they are things that should not surprise us if we were somehow to find out she had interviewed herself.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. I have given you far more than just a suggestion the woman had interviewed herself. You have been given much more to work with (if you require the woman to hold up a big sign reading "I did this interview myself" then these truther topics are not for you). I have given you more "evidence" so to speak than Anthony B. And so if you are going to give me a hard time about "sufficient proof" then why wouldn't you be consistent and give Anthony B a hard time also?
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. Why would you focus on my lack of evidence (despite there being some) *but not criticise Anthony B in the same way?* Anthony B has given you EVEN LESS to work with. And as for the claims themselves - my assertion is no big deal. Nothing hinges on the woman having interviewed herself. People can believe or doubt the event for other reasons. *However - the assertion that "Stefan Molyneux is Jeff C" is a big deal and much more important.* Yet between these two claims you seem to be focusing much of your time arguing with me rather than trying to get at the truth with Anthony B. You are seemingly giving him a free pass *while getting in my way at every turn.*
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92.  
  93.  
  94. *I suggest that you are being intentionally and unnecessarily argumentative*. Just as someone would if they had an *oppositional defiance disorder.* This is supported by your openness to the *insane and unsubstantiated* suggestion that "Stefan Molyneux" is also "Jeff C" while remaining *closed* - _and at times antagonistic_ - toward the idea of the woman having interviewed herself.
  95.  
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102. So tell me (if you even had the manners to read this far): *Which would surprise you more?* That "Stefan Molyneux" is also "Jeff C" or that the woman had interviewed herself? *Which claim - if found to be true - would be more surprising to you?*
  103.  
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108. __________________________________________
  109. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  110. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  111.  
  112. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  113. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  114.  
  115. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  116. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  117.  
  118. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  119. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!