on PassMark "CPU Value"

Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:09:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: info@passmark.com
Subject: Your database/table lacks the important CPU value in terms of mark/TDP, equivalent to cost for power over time.

For exemplum Xeon X5550 has the record "CPU Value" of 312.95 but has 5404 mark for 95 W (57/W), whereas Xeon 8180 28-core has 44139 for 205 W (215/W).  (However in that case the ware price is off by 2,000 so it'd take 60 processor-years to pay it off at the utility rate.  Maybe this only applies to parallel tasks.)

Atom C3858: 4852/25W = 194/W
Celeron G4920: 3318/54W = 61/W
Celeron M ULV: 184/7W = 26/W
Atom Z510: 194/2W = 97/W
Atom x5-Z8350: 1269/4W = 317/W
Atom x7-Z8750: 1910/4W = 475/W (former Mi Mini PC: $129 to $189)
Core m3-7Y30: 3544/4.5W = 788/W (Mi Mini PC: $129 to $189)
Celeron G540: 2205/65W = 34/W
i3-8100: 8079/65W = 124/W (Mac Mini 2018 i3: $800)
i3-8100T: 7431/35W = 212/W
i5-8500: 11940/65W = 184/W (Mac Mini 2018 i5: $1100)
i7-8700: 15155/65W = 233/W (Mac Mini 2018 i7: $1100)
i5-2400S: 4961/65W = 76/W
i3-8121U: ?/15W = (Intel NUC Cannon Lake-U: $558)
i3-8109U: 6178/28W = 221/W (Intel NUC Coffee Lake-U: $290 + $66 + $64 + $200 = $600)
i5-8259U: 10861/28W = 388/W (Intel NUC Coffee Lake-U: $380 + $66 + $85 + $200 = $731)
i7-8559U: 11849/28W = 423/W (Intel NUC Coffee Lake-U: $484 + $66 + $64 + $200 = $814)
i7-8705G: 10121/65W = 156/W (Intel NUC Kaby Lake-G: $720 + $66 + $64 + $200 = $1050)
i7-8809G: 11061/100W = 111/W (Intel NUC Kaby Lake-G: $800 + $66 + $64 + $200 = $1130)

However your comparison page, which takes user interaction, does tell the yearly running cost (but without performance per cost); why doesn't your list lead with that?

-Aut
(sorry for formatting problems in former emails)